Intel Optane Memory is SRT Cache...Again (Updated)

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • jimmysmitty
    Everything has a target market and this is probably better for workstations rather than regular joes.

    However it is the start of something larger that so far only Intel is pushing towards, which is NVDIMMs. I can't wait to see large NVDIMMs so I can make an OS drive in the memory. Right now Kaby lake has memory bandwidth of about 50GB/s. That is 5x faster read speeds available than a x16 PCIe SSD Seagate announced last year (10GB/s).

    And that's on the mainstream platform. That would be instant on. I want that.

    Of course DIMM size and availability will take time, as well as affordability, but I am fine with Intel testing ways to help improve it.
    Reply
  • manleysteele
    Call me pedantic, but, to me, it's not memory until it plugs into a memory slot. I already have 32 GBytes of memory in two memory slots with two more slots outstanding. The only reason I reserved two slots on this build was for a pair of 250 to 1000 GByte Optane memory modules that would make memory as storage viable. I could already have put two more DIMMS in at this size that will badly outpace this as cache (ramdisk).
    Reply
  • nzalog
    If you're going to be pedantic at least be accurate. Memory is anything that can store data. If it's RAM, ROM, Disk or part of a human brain it's irrelevant
    Reply
  • manleysteele
    We old guys know the difference between memory and storage.
    Reply
  • Better use that money to buy more ram.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    It is a beautiful new technology but we are still in the early phase. In the article we stated Optane is the next SLC. This is a very exciting moment in history but it will take time for Intel to give us what we really want.

    IMFT isn't the only company working on next generation memory technology, its just in the spotlight today and the first to mass production.

    Optane Memory AKA "Next Gen SSD Cache" is what we need moving forward with "low cost" TLC NAND. I think everyone will benefit from a $45 cache but we all really want a sizable boot volume that can hold a few games and other applications.

    It's pretty obvious that will come but the first iteration will come with an Extreme Edition price.
    Reply
  • Pompompaihn
    Got a crazy idea that probably isn't the least bit functional, practical, or even grounded in reality and/or has already been done:

    Some form of PCI card that you can plug old generation RAM into to use as a dedicated RAM disk. Would be a good way of utilizing old DDR3 RAM or whatnot on new machines, and achieve basically what this is doing without needing to pay for NAND.

    *end idea*
    Reply
  • CantBeStoped
    Can This cache a NVME M.2 drive? Would it even worth getting a Cache Drive for a M.2 SSD over 500GB?
    Reply
  • zodiacfml
    I was thinking almost the same thing as the guy above with the comment on "RAM". Once I have been using systems with substantial RAM, HDD speed is not much of a problem to me anymore.

    I have an SSD in a laptop using now but the speed increase isn't dramatic except for installation of programs which feels a bit quicker.

    Booting is still slow but I don't shutdown my laptop anymore as I use it every day anyway.
    Reply
  • RomeoReject
    I think the biggest reason this won't catch on is that it is already starting from a niche position - using a cache to increase certain tasks for the rest of the storage to handle is a small target to hit. But then they've gone from a small niche to a microscopic one by limiting this to one chipset that hasn't seen much adoption, and only keeping it to two manufacturers.

    I foresee this having the exact same long term impact as SRT did.
    Reply