AMD: 2D Performance Progress in Windows 7 With Catalyst 10.4?

Comprehensive Performance And New Questions

Let us take a closer look at the performance improvements. We used percentage ratings over pure numerical values for presenting these results. The numerical results may vary on different systems, but the percent differences between the versions are relative and much more consistent. The Radeon HD 5870 with Catalyst driver version 9.12, as used in the previous articles, serves as the reference point in all measurements.

Text

As expected, there is not much of a difference between the cards and driver versions when rendering text. And while text rendering was never one of the problem areas in our first articles, we still found a small performance increase in the new drivers. It might be measureable, but most likely not noticeable for the average user, as the performance levels are so high already.

Moving on, we will now turn our focus to the test areas where we could really measure significant differences in performance.

Lines

The rendering of lines was, in fact, one of the previously-reported problem areas. With the new drivers, the performance increase we measured is significant. These new results should be enough to ensure smooth 2D performance at all times. The GeForce GTX 285 is a bit faster than the Radeon HD 5870, but not so much that you can tell outside of a benchmark.

Interestingly, the GeForce GTX 480 results reveal that the Nvidia drivers have not been optimized a lot, and that there is still lots of room for improvement.

Polygons

The GeForce GTX 480 is a positive exception, while the differences between the other results are rather marginal. The lack of polygon performance is an issue, which is clearly visible to the user in some cases. This weakness is not of much relevance outside of a few specific applications. But nevertheless, all of the values are too low considering the real potential of these cards (especially if you know that a Radeon HD 5870, in some cases, gains a 250% performance boost simply because the task manager is open). We will investigate this ‘paradox’ in more detail on the next page.

Ellipses

The ellipse problem can be checked as a solved issue, as the ATI driver developers now are up to speed.

Blitting

Blitting results in the same kind of performance as stretching or drawing rectangles. The performance differences are small and all results indicate good 2D performance.

Interim Conclusion

ATI has done its homework properly. There are (except perhaps for the polygons) no longer any areas of its 2D performance that will actually restrict your productivity, even if there is still room for further optimization.

This is, in turn, related to certain security features of Windows 7 and affects both graphics companies to the same degree. Check out the next page for more information about this as well as its relation to the ‘paradox’ we mentioned.

  • ta152h
    Well, Microsoft creating an even slower operating system than their previous one is a company tradition. Bloated, slow, buggy software is something they take seriously, and it's not up to companies like AMD or Nvidia to take this privilege from Microsoft. People like it - they keep buying it.

    It's a pity OS/2 never made it. Windows needs real competition. Look what the K8 did to Intel.
    Reply
  • The Greater Good
    TA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    Reply
  • Lines, ellipses, and polygons are rarely, if ever, used in window system toolkits from the last 5-7 years. You will likely never see them used other than in specialized benchmarks. They are an API vestige of days long past.
    Reply
  • Am I missing something? 10.5 is the most recent
    Reply
  • Poisoner
    the greater goodTA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    What was insane about his post?
    Reply
  • Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    Reply
  • spidey180
    Keep up the good work ATI.
    Reply
  • FUtomNOreg
    Now where did I put that PCMag Winbench CD?????
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    You can now over/underclock while running multiple displays without tearing on the second monitor....
    Other than that, looks to be just a few minor bug fixes.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    PoisonerWhat was insane about his post?just everything


    @ toms - nice article as usual.
    Reply