GeForce GTS 250: Nvidia's G92 Strikes Again
Benchmark Results: Call of Duty: World At War
Although Call of Duty must be benchmarked with a fairly imprecise manual run-through with FRAPS running, the GTS 250 and GTX 9800+ are decidedly neck and neck, despite their frame buffer and clock speed differences.
The card in question—Nvidia’s GeForce GTS 250—falls right in between the AMD Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 cards, while Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is decidedly the fastest board benchmarked in this comparison.
With the detail settings cranking up, the GeForce GTS 250 takes an almost imperceptible lead over the GeForce GTX 9800+, which is likely due to the slightly higher clocks. Nevertheless, both G92-based boards again fall in between the two top contenders from AMD. The GeForce GTX 260 is almost faster at 1920x1200 than the GTS 250 at 1280x1024.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Call of Duty: World At War
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Left 4 Dead Next Page Benchmark Results: World in Conflict-
thepinkpanther when the GTX4xx series i guess nvidia will launch the g92 refresh yet again, this time as an entry level graphics card.Reply -
xx12amanxx Hmm no mention of the slower model's Nvidia is going to push instead of these cherry picked Oced model's.I heard these Oced model's were just for reviewers and that most of these cards will actually be slower model's with even less performance.Reply -
johnbilicki "so long as performance goes up or sideways as price goes down, we don’t see an issue with the reintroduction of proven technology"Reply
...which (in the context it has been applied) is the same as saying we don't mind nVidia renaming an 8800GT to a 9800GT and then a 9800GT to a whatever 2xx series...and so on and so forth. My point is simple: nVidia is pulling an extremely sleazy marketing scheme on consumers by renaming existing models. If you goof admit it and get on with life; that's why I appreciated the fact that when the first generation of Phenoms were botched AMD gracefully renamed unaffected quads with a 50 (IE 9650 instead of 9600). Trying to remember all the different names of the exact same model is like dealing with someone who IM's you from five different screen names, eventually you just end up blocking them out. -
cangelini xx12amanxxHmm no mention of the slower model's Nvidia is going to push instead of these cherry picked Oced model's.I heard these Oced model's were just for reviewers and that most of these cards will actually be slower model's with even less performance.Reply
Cherry picked? It's a retail product. -
curnel_D Chris, it's a decent article, but why in the world would you use 512mb models in everyting aside from the 250 and 260. If you would have shown the 1gb 4870, along with a 1gb 9800+, it would have showed a clearer picture of how the 250 is identical to the 9800+/9800/8800GT.Reply
Meh.
And there are MASSIVE rumours saying that Nvidia is hand-picking the review models sent to reviewers, even confirmed by HardOCP. Addressing that in this article would have been great. -
If I'm not mistaken didn't the 9 series and the HD4XXX series launch at about the same time effectively putting them into the same class? So why does everyone love to compare the 2XX series to the 4XXX cards and on top of that usually giving the ram advantage to nvidia i.e. comparing 1GB cards to 512MB cards?Reply
-
sohei i think Nvidia want's to marry this card with us ...love with force is not possible ...we need a new "woman" from nvidia not other clothes ...Nvidia has enough experience with clothes ...they should enter in fashion business like MicrosoftReply -
vaskodogama huh, anyway, I don't like the naming of GT200 cards anyway! AMD's got better price, and naming scheme!Reply
thepinkpantherwhen the GTX4xx series i guess nvidia will launch the g92 refresh yet again, this time as an entry level graphics card.I Agree!