Dell XPS 14 (2026) review: Two steps forward

Three cheers for a physical function row!

Dell XPS 14 (2026)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Dell is headed in the right direction with the XPS 14, and I can recommend it again. It offers a lightweight design, nice speakers, and a solid webcam — and it brings back a physical function row. I wish the keyboard had more feedback, and you'll need to save up for even entry-level configurations.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Attractive, lightweight design

  • +

    Strong battery life on the 1200p model

  • +

    Tandem OLED display option looks great

  • +

    Physical function row and borders on the touchpad

  • +

    Surprisingly good speakers

  • +

    The XPS name is back!

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Low-travel, lattice-free keyboard made me more error-prone

  • -

    Starts at $1,600

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Dell XPS 14 is back, and it was badly in need of reinvention. Following a poorly executed name change and some design choices that were made in the name of looks over functionality, the new system is a vast improvement. Starting at $1,599.99, the new Dell XPS 14 (DA14260) is lighter, smaller, and more functional than it has been in years, with a physical function row and tactile bars marking where the touchpad is. You get strong performance from Intel's new Core Ultra Series 3 processors, incredible battery life on the 1920 x 1200p model — arguably enough already to consider it as one of the best ultrabooks — with a screen boasting a variable refresh rate that goes down as low as 1 Hz.

The shallow keyboard remains divisive, but updates to the speakers and an option for a tandem OLED help make the XPS feel fresh.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • dmylrea
    I'm wondering why, in a $2200 laptop, a sub-400nit OLED display isn't listed as a giant con?
    Almost every laptop OLED in existence is higher than this one, and Tandem OLED's are supposed to be brighter than normal OLED's, yes? If Dell is artificially limiting the brightness for extended battery life, then give an option when plugged in to have max brightness. Otherwise what kind of panel are they using that is so dim?

    Going by reviews I've watched, the Asus Expertbook Ultra is going to eat this Dell XPS's lunch AND dinner! It's the one to watch!
    Reply
  • BillyBuerger
    The article keeps mentioning 1080p and I couldn't believe that dell would go backwards to a 16:9 panel again after most every laptop seems to have finally gone to 16:10 panels. Dells website is crap and the "tech specs" only say 2k (or 2.8k for the OLED) without any exact mention of the resolution. But after digging into the Setup and Specifications document, they do list it as a 1920x1200 display, not 1080p.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Are you sure the tandem OLED is 356nits?
    The specs say it should be 500 nits
    notebookcheck measured it at 389nits
    https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-14-2026-review-Fully-reborn-with-Intel-Panther-Lake-X7.1218670.0.html#c15520378
    Is this an issue with early review samples?
    Barely 400 nits, and dipping into 350 nits territory is quite far from 500 nits, let alone what I'd expect from a tandem OLED.
    Reply
  • lotechnz
    Thunderbolt 4? 2020 called and said its got a new standard.
    Also the missing HDMI port seems like a miss that even Apple realised people need more than streamlined port selection.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    Seems decent-ish if somewhat expensive (but a lot of hardware is these days).

    Hate dell for not letting you configure them yourself though. You want more RAM? Then you have to buy a faster cpu too. That kind of nonsense.

    Still my XPS 9560 that I got like eight years ago still works like new since I put in a new battery and installed Linux last week. Gives me a soft spot for the XPS line.
    Reply
  • Greg7579
    I spent $4,500 bucks on a new Dell 16 Premium Laptop about 4 months ago. Dell had abandoned the XPS which was much to my displeasure, as I buy a new XPS every 2-3 years. I'm a travel photographer and shoot big Medium Format files, so I need the mobility and power. I fully loaded that laptop with 64 ram and a 4TB M.2 PCIe 5 SSD along with a 4080 GPU.

    It is a fantastic laptop, but I immediately hated not having physical top row delete and other function keys and hated that big tracking area and that flat almost touch screen-like keyboard. I longed for my XPS form and function and could not understand why Dell had decided to abandon XPS.

    My luck: Two weeks after I got the new high-end laptop in the mail, Dell announces that they were reversing course and going back to XPS. I'm sitting on a 5,000-dollar dead brand laptop that is 3 only months old.

    That said - I got in before the huge recent price hikes on DDDR 5 ram and M.2 PCIe 5 SSDs. This laptop would probably be 9 grand now with all of this high-end and big ram and SSD capacity that I have on this laptop....
    Reply
  • cknobman
    4 stars?
    For a laptop that is absurdly overpriced, terrible keyboard, and lower performing than competitors?

    Does not make sense.
    Reply