Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026) Review: Stunning Mini‑LED, serious muscle, and a few missed steps

A colossal, mini-LED-equipped powerhouse that dazzles on screen but doesn’t quite clinch the crown.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The ROG Strix Scar 18 delivers a gorgeous display and serious horsepower, yet its missing PCIe 5.0 SSD, single-channel RAM, and second-place performance leave room for improvement. Razer’s Blade 18 ultimately remains our top recommendation in this elite class.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Brilliant mini-LED display

  • +

    Modern connectivity, including Thunderbolt 5

  • +

    Unique lighting features

  • +

    Easily upgradeable

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Very expensive

  • -

    Single-channel RAM on a $5,000 laptop

  • -

    No PCIe 5.0 SSD

  • -

    Soft-focus webcam

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Asus’ ROG Strix Scar 18 (starting at $4,299.99) is an example of abundance in the world of gaming laptops, built around an 18-inch display and the latest flagship silicon: a Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus with Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 5090 in our test unit. This machine makes a loud first impression, from its stellar (albeit tricky to configure) mini-LED display to the unique scrolling marquee lighting on its lid. But at this price - $4,999.99 as tested – the Scar 18 must prove it can hold the line against Razer’s Blade 18 before it can claim a spot at the top.

Design of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2026)

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Charles Jefferies
Freelance Reviewer

Charles Jefferies is a freelance reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US. He covers laptop and desktop PCs, especially gaming models.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    Single DIMM in their is scandalous ath this price. Whilst DDR5 have an inherent dual channel set up (2 X 32bit channels), it's not true dual channel, and leaves a lot of performance on the table. The loss of system bandwidth/performances can be up to 25% in certain usages, including gaming.

    Given the memory issue, it would have been a good idea to stick in 2x kit, to see how the performance compares, and see how it performes against the other machines (all of which are dual channel I believe).
    Reply
  • PEnns
    "Single-channel RAM on a $5,000 laptop""32GB DDR5-6400 (1x 32GB)"
    I noticed this ugly trend recently on a $2000 PC as well (1x 16 GB of RAM), but on a $5000 premium laptop?
    How much more must Asus pay their suppliers for 16x2 instead??

    Ludicrous,
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    PEnns said:
    "Single-channel RAM on a $5,000 laptop""32GB DDR5-6400 (1x 32GB)"
    I noticed this ugly trend recently on a $2000 PC as well (1x 16 GB of RAM), but on a $5000 premium laptop?
    How much more must Asus pay their suppliers for 16x2 instead??

    Ludicrous,
    Ugggh! It's really irritating.
    Reply
  • Nemesis788450
    weird... in Europe / my version that i just bought has 64 (2x32) ram... was 1000 bucks cheaper than the razer 18
    and pci 5 vs 4 is just stupid - drives up the prices, makes it run way hotter and wont make any difference in work or play
    Reply
  • Mindstab Thrull
    A 32GB stick at least leaves you room to add a second stick and DDR5 isn't as bad at almost NEEDING dual-channel memory to work well.
    I expect anyone interested in this will either try and get it as 2x16 or 2x32 (as @Nemesis788450 mentioned) or just pick up another 32GB stick when pricing is more reasonable.
    Also I noticed that it's 6400 MT/s which, for laptop memory, is quite good. I'm used to seeing much worse for a laptop - like 5600 CL bad ;)
    Reply
  • Nemesis788450
    Here it was 2x32 ram included and was way cheaper than other optios....cost 4500 chf incl all taxes (usdchf .8, eurchf .9)...the same equipped razerblade 18 2026 was 1000 chf more
    Reply