Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2026) review: Big CPU power in a mispriced gaming laptop

A compact laptop that excels at productivity but stumbles when its gaming ambitions meet reality.

Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2026)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 is an impressively powerful compact laptop with standout productivity performance from its Ryzen AI Max+ CPU, with good battery life to boot. However, its integrated Radeon GPU at this premium price sharply limits its appeal. It’s a solid choice for niche users prioritizing CPU horsepower, but a poor value for gamers.

Pros

  • +

    Strong CPU performance

  • +

    Good battery life

  • +

    Decent build quality

  • +

    Supports two storage drives

Cons

  • -

    Subpar gaming performance

  • -

    Weak audio

  • -

    Wi-Fi 6E, not 7

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

We’ve tested AMD’s Strix Halo platform in desktop form, and now it arrives in a 14-inch laptop courtesy of Asus’ TUF Gaming A14. This compact laptop delivers abundant CPU performance from its Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and proves well-rounded in many areas beyond raw speed, from battery life to input devices. However, for $2,199.99 as tested, the question is whether its integrated Radeon 8060S graphics can deliver the gaming performance needed to justify its premium price, let alone make it one of the best gaming laptops.

Design of the Asus TUF Gaming A14

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Charles Jefferies
Freelance Reviewer

Charles Jefferies is a freelance reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US. He covers laptop and desktop PCs, especially gaming models.

  • Notton
    Re: Wi-Fi 6E not 7
    It's a Realtek Wi-Fi card. I don't think it'll make a huge difference between 6E and 7.
    Ditto Mediatek.
    AFAIK, Intel BE200 still doesn't work on AMD.
    That leaves us with only Qualcomm, but hardly any laptop OEM uses their cards for some reason.
    Reply
  • vinay2070
    It would have been nice if a macbook Air M5 was included in the benchmarks.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    vinay2070 said:
    It would have been nice if a macbook Air M5 was included in the benchmarks.
    I guess they want to sell that convenience behind their paywall...

    Not that they have a great number of meaningful productivity benchmarks, which match the usage niches a Strix Halo might fill: they only offer Handbrake and Cinebench and those you can look up, even if e.g. the Handbrake Data on the M5 Air isn't in the charts, only the text: wonder why?$?

    In any case this laptop just proves, that Strix Halo doesn't make sense, especially not with the current DRAM pricing: it's a tech demo without a consumer audience, combining nearly all disadvantages of its brethren, while delivering only a niche bonus on unified memory bandwidth, for some AI stuff.

    On a 32GB machine, that's 16GB max, I believe, and at €2000 you'd be better off with a dGPU.

    Typing this on a Lenovo LOQ ARP9 from last summer, that cost me around €800 with an 8-core APU and an RTX 4060. It got upgraded to 64GB of RAM (for VMs) and 4TB of SSD storage on the cheap back then, still way below €2000 but also way better at nearly everything except CPU video encoding: not a workload I care about in a notebook.

    And the lower-bin variants with less than full RAM make even less sense than the top models, except if they were to sell at rock bottom prices: Strix Halo is a bit of a console design, althought far too CPU heavy for that market, but aimed to get plenty of GPU power for cheaper production cost than a dGPU and even the Fruity Cult's Mx, because those require more expensive DRAM stacks and packaging.

    But when they sell it above Fruity Cult prices, that value proposition just collapses into nothing and this machine proves it.

    Stay away unless you've validated it against a critical workload of yours! (or they offer it at €600)
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Notton said:
    Re: Wi-Fi 6E not 7
    It's a Realtek Wi-Fi card. I don't think it'll make a huge difference between 6E and 7.
    Ditto Mediatek.
    AFAIK, Intel BE200 still doesn't work on AMD.
    That leaves us with only Qualcomm, but hardly any laptop OEM uses their cards for some reason.
    Yes, found out about the B200 issue the hard way...

    The Qualcomms must be pricey, because Lenovo does use them on higher-end laptops. In retail, they turn out nearly impossible to get, at least last time I tried here in Europe.

    Mediatek are a dog, terrible performance, terrible drivers: that why I went for Intel, especially at the price they were selling even the Killer variants of the B200...

    Thankfully A200 cards (with performance boost enabled) work just fine and deliver pretty near the same performance, unless 5GHz is congested near you.

    And then I have 10Gbit Thunderbolt and 5Gbit USB 3.2 NICs on a long leash, just in case I get a little too impatient wich what goes over the air.
    Reply