Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition review: A masterclass in mobility and usability

Lenovo’s flagship ultraportable pairs an ultralight build with premium ergonomics, a vivid OLED display, and enterprise-ready options.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 is a highly capable flagship that excels in ergonomics, connectivity, and business-ready features. It remains one of the most complete ultraportables available – and carries a price to match.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Ultralight design

  • +

    Vivid OLED display

  • +

    Excellent input devices

  • +

    Sharp webcam

  • +

    Impressive audio

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Pricey

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Lenovo’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 (starts at $2,032; $2,217.30 as tested) enters the laptop market with the poise of a veteran. This series has spent years at the top of the ultralight business stack and shows no sign of slowing down. Light and refined as ever with Intel’s “Panther Lake” silicon and equipped with a class-leading keyboard, OLED display, and enterprise-ready tech, it’s every bit the flagship it’s intended to be. That said, consumer models like Dell’s XPS 14 have also raised the bar, so whether the ThinkPad X1 Carbon’s refinements keep it ahead of the pack remains to be seen.

Design of the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Charles Jefferies
Freelance Reviewer

Charles Jefferies is a freelance reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US. He covers laptop and desktop PCs, especially gaming models.

  • timsSOFTWARE
    The article suggests the difference between 20 hour battery life and 12 hour battery life is LCD vs. OLED.

    Is nearly cutting the battery life in half really worth it for an OLED screen? Maybe I just don't know what I'm missing - as I've avoided OLED laptops and monitors due to not wanting to worry about burn-in - but personally, I don't think so. Current-gen IPS screens don't leave much to be desired. If I upgrade my TV at some point, I'll go for OLED or similar, but for everything except gaming/media consumption it just doesn't seem worth the tradeoffs.

    I wonder how the new OLED Macbooks will fare in regard to battery life? Having good battery life paired with good performance has long been their calling card.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    These are being shipped with a Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. (YMTC) SSD's, while they seem to be decent they do not run at Pcie 4 speeds, more like Pcie 3.0.

    Teamgroup, Silicon Power, Kingston and Adata, some of the more common budget SSDs that have been known to fail in the past use them as well. I never used one so I can not comment, just food for thought.

    For this price I would expect a decent, proven SSD.
    Reply
  • bkuhl
    "The ThinkPad X1 Carbon lasted 13 minutes and 10 seconds in our battery test, which consists of web browsing, running OpenGL tests, and streaming videos with the screen at 150 nits while connected to Wi-Fi."

    I'd expect more from a current generation laptop....
    Reply
  • ni6hant
    I guess that con is in itself enough: Pricey!
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    timsSOFTWARE said:
    The article suggests the difference between 20 hour battery life and 12 hour battery life is LCD vs. OLED.

    Is nearly cutting the battery life in half really worth it for an OLED screen? Maybe I just don't know what I'm missing - as I've avoided OLED laptops and monitors due to not wanting to worry about burn-in - but personally, I don't think so. Current-gen IPS screens don't leave much to be desired. If I upgrade my TV at some point, I'll go for OLED or similar, but for everything except gaming/media consumption it just doesn't seem worth the tradeoffs.

    I wonder how the new OLED Macbooks will fare in regard to battery life? Having good battery life paired with good performance has long been their calling card.
    For a laptop that’ll mostly be used for work I wouldn’t get an oled screen either. They’re usually more expensive and use more power (though I’m doubtful if this laptop would get 20 hours of work done with an ips screen).

    Also: 3K resolution on a 14 inch screen? I’m sure it’ll look great and your text will be large enough and really sharp with scaling, but since I’m a forty something FHD+ on 14 inch is fine for me, especially for work.

    This does seem like a great laptop though, still love working on my T14S and this’ll probably be even better. I’d say the real competition from Apple would be the MBA unless you really need the connectivity of the MBP. The MBA seems closer to this laptop in performance and price.
    Reply
  • timecop1818
    not 4K screen, so don't care. it seems lenovo killed off last 4k devices in aura series last year and fixated on this stupid uncommon resolution AND 16:9 screens. i own the last 4K 16:10 panel yoga. unfortunate move on lenovo part. just when Intel arc was getting perfectly good for driving 4K nicely too.

    i don't even care if it's OLED. gimme more pixels!!
    Reply
  • timecop1818
    VizzieTheViz said:
    This does seem like a great laptop though, still love working on my T14S and this’ll probably be even better. I’d say the real competition from Apple would be the MBA unless you really need the connectivity of the MBP. The MBA seems closer to this laptop in performance and price.
    but apple thing doesn't run Windows so it's a pointless comparison? people buying x86 stuff aren't buying it to scroll Instagram. they are trying to do actual work, potentially with high quality proprietary software that only runs on windows.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    What you get for the price is embarrassingly bad.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    timecop1818 said:
    but apple thing doesn't run Windows so it's a pointless comparison? people buying x86 stuff aren't buying it to scroll Instagram. they are trying to do actual work, potentially with high quality proprietary software that only runs on windows.
    Yeah except today there’s a lot of software that’s available for both windows and Mac OS.

    I’m sure there’s still proprietary software that’ll only run on windows but there are a lot of people that’ll get by just fine with either OS. Especially the ones shopping for an ultralight ultrabook instead of a workhorse laptop.

    Proprietary software can be a good reason to choose windows over Mac OS, but making out like Mac OS is just for toys and you can only get work done on windows is a bit silly.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Too many laptops available it’s ridiculous. Another e-waste junk for the dump. Best option right now is just use an iPhone.
    Reply