Open-source OpenWrt One router released at $89 — 'hacker-friendly device' sports two Ethernet ports, three USB ports, with dual-band Wi-Fi 6

OpenWrt One
(Image credit: Banana Pi / OpenWrt)

More than nine months after OpenWrt began finalizing its $100 open-source router, the consortium has finally released the OpenWrt One. According to the Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC), one of the groups working alongside OpenWrt, this wireless router “will never be locked and is forever unbrickable” as it was built-for and comes with the open-source OpenWrt firmware pre-installed.

The group worked together to draft the specifications for this router, and then OpenWrt tapped Banana Pi for the device production. You can now order a complete set with a case on Aliexpress for just $89 (although it’s out of stock at the time of writing), but the tinkerers among us could choose just the logic board for $68.42, though it’s unavailable in the U.S. at the moment. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
OpenWrt One Specifications
SOCMediaTek MT7981B
Wi-FiMediaTek MT7976C dual-band Wi-Fi 6 (2x2 2.4 GHz + 3x3 5 GHz)
DRAM128MB SPI NAND + 16MB SPI NOR
Ethernet1x 2.5 Gbit WAN + 1x 1 Gbit LAN
USB1x USB Type-C PD 12V, 1x USB Type-C (serial interface)
USB HostUSB 2.0 Type-A
Storage1x 2230/2242 NVMe PCIe 2.0 slot
Mechanical Switch1x for boot selection (NAND/NOR)
ExpansionmikroBUS
CertificationFCC/EC/RoHS compliant

The OpenWrt One comes at a crucial time when many network and storage devices are becoming outdated and essentially turned to e-waste. This is because of vulnerabilities that the original manufacturer refuses to patch, citing end-of-product-life reasons.

For example, D-Link has refused to patch over 60,000 NAS devices that have a critical security flaw. Another set of old D-Link routers were found to be susceptible to threats, but the company recommended that affected users upgrade and gave them a discount voucher for new purchases, instead of releasing a software update. Aside from replacing their hardware, the only solution left for affected users is to replace the stock firmware with a third-party one, like OpenWrt. However, this might be difficult if your equipment isn’t on the list of supported devices.

This makes the OpenWrt One a great solution for those who want a new router with hardware specifically designed for the OpenWrt firmware. At just $89, it's the perfect option if you want something that will last you a lifetime and not have to worry about getting a "bricked" device because the manufacturer no longer supports software updates for it. However, if the gear you have is supported by OpenWrt, you might not need to purchase a new router at all—just download the OpenWrt firmware and flash it onto your device, and you’re good to go.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Steve Nord_
    We said WiFi 6E (drinks Ghost faze heavily.) Or just 7. Ah! I just found this on AliExpress:
    $83.57 | BPI-R4-NIC-BE14 WiFi 7 Module with MediaTek MT7995AV Optional Antennas 32-bit RISC-V MCU 2 PCIe 3.0 Interface for Banana Pi R4
    https://a.aliexpress.com/_mLTa8Q7
    Reply
  • williamcll
    Is that really enough RAM?
    Reply
  • Notton
    williamcll said:
    Is that really enough RAM?
    That's an error in the chart.
    It has 1GB DDR4
    The NAND/NOR is for storage, I think?
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    too bad the other network port is only gigabit...

    2.5g would of been better considering the wan is 2.5....
    Reply
  • speculatrix
    as soon as I saw "Mediatek" in the description, I thought, uh-oh..

    maybe they've changed but I have low expections of Mediatek releasing source code for drivers and things, as historically they were poor for this, even when they had a legal obligation to do so under the GPL.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    It is strange they do not use wifi6e since wifi6 doesn't really give much over wifi5. The newer chips cost almost exactly the same when you look the bulk prices up.

    I don't really see the need for third party firmware anymore...other than when you don't trust the manufacture to provide updates.

    Pretty much even very cheap routers now have all the key features people used to use third party firmware to get. Many have even VPN and NAS support.

    Things like advanced firewall support are almost completely useless because of encryption. The very advanced firewall methods are also well beyond the cpu power of these tiny router cpu.

    Other things like support of router protocols like OSPF....who is really going to use that. More of a toy to play with since you need large numbers of routers to need be running a routing protocol inside your house.

    The really fun features that I would want to play with are locked up in drivers that you load into the wifi chips. I remember my disappointment when I wanted to add a simple counter that showed how many wifi frames had errors. No way to get that information out of the wifi chips.
    Reply
  • feiyax
    speculatrix said:
    as soon as I saw "Mediatek" in the description, I thought, uh-oh..

    maybe they've changed but I have low expections of Mediatek releasing source code for drivers and things, as historically they were poor for this, even when they had a legal obligation to do so under the GPL.

    I don't see any better option though. The only up-to-date players nowadays are just Mediatek and Qualcomm.

    Qualcomm is a pain in the ass to get its NSS working for NAT/netfilter offloading, while mediatek has very good support since about the EdgeRouter X days.

    Mediatek provides update via an easily accessible repo, with lots of their hardware-specific fix: https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/

    But good luck finding the equivalent for Qualcomm. From what i know, most Qualcomm supports come from either leaked (and outdated) QSDK or reverse engineering.
    Reply
  • feiyax
    Ogotai said:
    too bad the other network port is only gigabit...

    2.5g would of been better considering the wan is 2.5....

    Judged from the SoC's datasheet, https://one.openwrt.org/hardware/MT7981B_Wi-Fi6_Platform_Datasheet_Open_V1.0.pdf

    The chip has just one gigabit and one 2.5G interfaces
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    feiyax said:
    Judged from the SoC's datasheet, https://one.openwrt.org/hardware/MT7981B_Wi-Fi6_Platform_Datasheet_Open_V1.0.pdf
    The chip has just one gigabit and one 2.5G interfaces
    yep, which it too bad... for that. i wouldnt touch this... while my connection is only a gigiabit down, the router i have, has a 2.5g wan, and, while it does have 4 gigabit ports, it also has a 10 G port, which most of my network is connected to via the 10g switch i also picked up, so as the network here improves, i will still be able to adjust over to the 10G side if need be, the only things i have that are still gigabit, are the tvs, and a couple of computers... .
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    This is why I've long sense just built my own routers and NAS devices. Device manufacturers would rather sell you a new device then let you upgrade a previous one.

    It's not hard to build your own system from parts, install linux and then install the various software to do the rest.
    Reply