AMD Announces Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1700 And Pricing, Pre-Orders Begin Today

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Image

Ryzen 7 1800X (Pre-Order)

Image

Ryzen 7 1700X (Pre-Order)

Image

Ryzen 7 1700 (Pre-Order)

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • X1800 performs as i5 6600@4.0Ghz in gaming which means Kaby Lake is going to walk over. Besides attractive pricing there is really nothing here to see.

    Are we going to see official benchmarks now so people can get disappointed or feel good about their Kaby Lake purchase. It is no mistake AMD is comparing against Intel 2011 v3 socket in gaming where Intel CPU is not even properly overclocked because they know Ryzen is losing big time against Kaby Lake in gaming which is also faster than even 10 Core 2011-V3 CPU.

    But i do have to admit, those prices especially for unlocked X1700 are attractive and will push mainstream gaming to utilize more cores 4-6.

    Now, waiting for Intel price adjustment so i can update one of the systems to 8 Core.
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    You know, people use their computer for things other than gaming.

    But also, the i5 6600 for $220 would compete with the Ryzen lowest 4 core 4 thread chip R3 1200x for $150. Also the cheap $70 motherboard would make for a cheap gaming rig under $550. (Power Supply $40, Case $40, 8GB DDR4 ram $50, 128GB SSD $40, rx470 vid card $160). Even cheaper if you can cannibilize parts from an old pc like hard drive, case,vid card and power supply.

    Fact is, even if ryzen single thread performance is 10% lower than intel, with the pricing the way it is, it will be competitive and disruptive to the market.
    Reply
  • ohim
    19332336 said:
    X1800 performs as i5 6600@4.0Ghz in gaming which means Kaby Lake is going to walk over. Besides attractive pricing there is really nothing here to see.

    Are we going to see official benchmarks now so people can get disappointed or feel good about their Kaby Lake purchase. It is no mistake AMD is comparing against Intel 2011 v3 socket in gaming where Intel CPU is not even properly overclocked because they know Ryzen is losing big time against Kaby Lake in gaming which is also faster than even 10 Core 2011-V3 CPU.

    But i do have to admit, those prices especially for unlocked X1700 are attractive and will push mainstream gaming to utilize more cores 4-6.

    Now, waiting for Intel price adjustment so i can update one of the systems to 8 Core.
    There is more to a CPU than gaming, and you have no clue how good is Ryzen in games ... so how about wait for the final benchmarks
    Reply
  • fla56
    @freak777power -er no, that's only in some of last year's games

    in any case any CPU from the last couple of years is good enough for them...
    Reply
  • pacdrum_88
    As a dude that edits 4K footage on a regular basis, records music, edits photos, and games... These bad boys look like the cat's meow! I'll definitely be picking one up in the coming months and relegate my Skylake build to lower level office work. ;-)
    Reply
  • gsxrme
    I don't see any game benchmarks. At the moment i'm excited to see AMD move forward but not sold.
    Reply
  • I couldn't help but notice that AMD tested their Ryzen CPU again 6900k by setting up dual channel memory setup for Intel thus crippling the platform...beep sorry people run quad memory channel setup. You can clearly tell where is AMD Ryzen suffering...memory controller, single threaded performance. Also they kept 6900k on stock clock speed...beep all those 6900k are running 4.4/4.5 in peoples machine. As I said i was hopping for 30% IPC over Intel across the board but actually i am seeing -10%. Yes, price is attractive but hey i already invested money in Intel years ago and all AMD did is caught up with Intel after 10 years. Again to me that is f. failure.

    Guess what, if you really need CPU for video editing...you can buy 14/28 Xeon Retail running at 2.5Ghz all cores turbo 3.0Ghz and it will eat AMD Ryzen and i7 like there is no tomorrow and cost of CPU is $350. So that argument is really BS.
    Reply
  • bloodroses
    19332336 said:
    X1800 performs as i5 6600@4.0Ghz in gaming which means Kaby Lake is going to walk over. Besides attractive pricing there is really nothing here to see.

    Are we going to see official benchmarks now so people can get disappointed or feel good about their Kaby Lake purchase. It is no mistake AMD is comparing against Intel 2011 v3 socket in gaming where Intel CPU is not even properly overclocked because they know Ryzen is losing big time against Kaby Lake in gaming which is also faster than even 10 Core 2011-V3 CPU.

    But i do have to admit, those prices especially for unlocked X1700 are attractive and will push mainstream gaming to utilize more cores 4-6.

    Now, waiting for Intel price adjustment so i can update one of the systems to 8 Core.

    I assume you're referring to this article?
    https://www.extremetech.com/computing/241688-new-leaked-benchmarks-show-amds-ryzen-going-toe-toe-intels-core-i7
    You do realize that that was with an under clocked (3.15ghz- boost 3.3ghz) early engineering sample CPU. The actual released CPUs will bench higher. Also, in the printed publication, there are hints that the CPU can OC up to 5ghz on air:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5krghq/remember_the_canard_pc_magazine_about_zen_it_has/?st=izh2kmdd&sh=d0bea305


    19332449 said:
    I couldn't help but notice that AMD tested their Ryzen CPU again 6900k by setting up dual channel memory setup for Intel thus crippling the platform...beep sorry people run quad memory channel setup. You can clearly tell where is AMD Ryzen suffering...memory controller, single threaded performance. Also they kept 6900k on stock clock speed...beep all those 6900k are running 4.4/4.5 in peoples machine.

    You might want to read this article about dual channel vs quad channel performance....
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/2982965/components/quad-channel-ram-vs-dual-channel-ram-the-shocking-truth-about-their-performance.html

    As with the clock speeds, refer to the reddit link I sent above.

    This could be a very interesting year for CPUs.
    Reply
  • refillable
    Why would some be disappointed with the release? Broadwell IPC, or a bit higher. The 4.0 GHz single core boost one (1800X) scored 162 on single thread (my 6600K gets around the same scores @stock) and there are 8 cores! We're talking about OPTIONS here, not whether or not you gain 1% performance improvement on your favourite title vs. Kaby Lake! Shook my head.

    I guess this simply means that some people are not welcomed at all to see interesting options, or at least have short foresights.
    Reply
  • Brian_R170
    As a gamer, I am so disappointed that all of the marketing and leaked benchmarks have compared Ryzen against only the high-end 6- and 8-core Broadwell parts. We know that those chips make up a tiny percentage of gaming PCs and we also know that for years Tom's hasn't recommend buying more than an unlocked i5 for gaming, which is still nearly $100 cheaper than the lowest-price Ryzen mentioned in this article. I guess we'll be overflowing in benchmarks and real reviews one week from now, but I'm concerned we may have to wait several more months for a Ryzen gaming chip that competes in both price and gaming performance with the unlocked i5.
    Reply