Cambridge Analytica Document Leak Exposes Mass Voter Manipulation

(Image credit: Shutterstock)


Earlier this year a Twitter user called @HindsightFiles started to leak documents from Cambridge Analytica, the company that used 87 million Facebook users’ data without permission to manipulate elections for its clients. The documents released so far have revealed information about manipulated elections in Malaysia, Kenya and Brazil, and The Guardian reported today that this is just the beginning.

The anonymous leaker was eventually revealed to be Brittany Kaiser, an ex-Cambridge Analytica employee turned whistleblower. The released documents were the same ones that were subpoenaed by Robert Mueller’s investigation. Over 100,000 documents are set to be released over the coming months revealing voter manipulation on an “industrial scale” in over 68 countries.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • King_V
    Earlier this year?
    Reply
  • therickmu25
    Wait, is this the same Christopher Steele cited that with money from the Clinton campaign, put together a fake dossier on Trump in order to persuade public opinion and was then used by the corrupt FBI to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page?
    The same Clinton campaign that received hundreds of millions of dollars from Ukraine and Russia for pay to play through the Clinton foundation? Which has eerily all dried up since?

    Not the best of sources.
    Reply
  • King_V
    therickmu25 said:
    Wait, is this the same Christopher Steele cited that with money from the Clinton campaign, put together a fake dossier on Trump in order to persuade public opinion and was then used by the corrupt FBI to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page?
    The same Clinton campaign that received hundreds of millions of dollars from Ukraine and Russia for pay to play through the Clinton foundation? Which has eerily all dried up since?

    Not the best of sources.

    Your biases/blinders are showing, and intentionally repeating falsehoods is not a good look. Try to stick to the topic.

    That aside I thought the whistleblower was Christopher Wylie, though.
    Reply
  • TJ Hooker
    therickmu25 said:
    Christopher Steele Not the best of sources.
    He just commented on this leak, he's not the source.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I have absolutely no idea what "voter manipulation" means in this context.
    How is it different than any of the other invasive targeted advertising on Facebook - other than maybe Cambridge Analytica didn't pay Facebook for the Facebook data that they used?
    Reply