AMD announces pricing for Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D at $699 and $599; chips arrive March 12th

AMD has announced that it will release its long-awaited Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 9900X3D processors on March 12th. AMD's new top-of-the-line CPUs will be sold for $699 and $599, respectively.

After being announced at CES 2025, AMD's new flagships will arrive to an excited market that has not seen a new CPU release since the Ryzen 7 9800X3D arrived in November. The 9800X3D has suffered from inflated pricing since its launch, and the addition of new X3D models should help to broaden the availability of AMD's gaming-optimized tech, though these new premium models will come at a much higher price point

The $699 Ryzen 9 9950X3D will launch at the same price point as its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We fully expect the 9950X3D to become among the best CPUs for gaming on the market, as the current top dog, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, already beats Intel in gaming workloads, and 9950X3D's 16 cores are likely to make it a solid productivity CPU as well.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 9900X3D — Pricing and Specifications

CPU

Street (MSRP)

Arch

Cores / Threads (P+E)

P-Core Base / Boost Clock (GHz)

Cache (L2/L3)

TDP / PBP or MTP

Memory

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

$699

Zen 5 X3D

16 / 32

5.7

144 MB

170W

DDR5-5600

Ryzen 9 9950X

$559 ($599)

Zen 5

16 / 32

4.3 / 5.7

80MB (16+64)

170W / 230W

DDR5-5600

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

$599

Zen 5 X3D

12 / 24

5.5

140

120W

DDR5-5600

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

$480

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.2

104MB (8+96)

120W / 162W

DDR5-5600

Ryzen 9 9900X

$429 ($469)

Zen 5

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

76MB (12+64)

120W / 162W

DDR5-5600

Ryzen 7 9700X

$326 ($329)

Zen 5

8 / 16

3.8 / 5.5

40MB (8+32)

65W / 88W / 105W

DDR5-5600

While we still don't know the base clocks of the two new releases, what we do know about their speeds and feeds is exciting, to say the least. The chips will be 16-core and 12-core parts, with the 9950X3D turboing up to 5.7 GHz. The "X3D" in the CPU names refers to the inclusion of 3D V-Cache technology, a game-boosting AMD invention that stacks a wicked-fast cache chiplet beneath the CPU dies to maximize gaming performance.

The 9950X3D will arrive with 144MB of total cache, dwarfing the 80MB found on the 9950, non-X3D. The 9900X3D's 12 cores will turbo up to 5.5 GHz and be aided by 140MB of total cache, almost double that of its non-X3D flavor. The chips will run mighty warm, with TDPs rated at 170W and 120W.

As far as getting your hands on a 9950X3D on release day, there are no promises to be made. The top-end CPUs and GPUs have been scarce lately; the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is currently out of stock via AMD and selling at inflated pricing at retailers, and not much needs to be said about the difficulty of obtaining Nvidia or AMD's newest GPU releases. So, while AMD's 9950X3D will be wonderful for gaming, if a CPU crushes frames with no one around to buy it, is it still the best number cruncher?

Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gaming and Content Creation Benchmarks

While we don't have independent benchmarks just yet, AMD claims the gaming and productivity performance of the 9950X3D and 9900X3D are outstanding. Per AMD's own internal testing shown at CES, the 9950X3D is 20% faster than Intel's flagship Core Ultra 9 285K in 1080p high gaming tests. The chip also ekes out an 8% performance increase over the last-gen AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, a nice generational improvement.

AMD's CES panel also stated that 9950X3D's performance is within 1% of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which comes as little surprise as it matches the performance delta between last-gen's 7950X3D and 7800X3D. The 9900X3D didn't get nearly as much love in the panel, receiving no comparative tests, which is a bit worrying but not entirely surprising; last-gen's Ryzen 9 7900X3D was a 3-star chip at best playing in 7950X3D's shadow.

In terms of productivity, the same 3D V-Cache technology that blesses gaming speeds typically hampers productivity numbers a fair bit. The 3D V-Cache chiplet affixed to the die doesn't seem to be too much of an albatross around the neck of 9950X3D, with AMD claiming a 10% lead over the Core Ultra 9 285K in performance benchmarks. The testing suite shown off at CES seemed to be heavily weighted towards multi-core workloads, which the 16-core 9950X3D understandably run away with, but the 285K already leads over AMD's non-X3D SKUs in single-threaded performance testing, so those users with a productivity suite prioritizing single-core power may not fall in love with the 9950X3D.

For everything else we know about the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 9900X3D, be sure to check out our CES writeup on the chips. March 12th will likely bring with it a new chapter in AMD's gaming CPU dominance, though whether it also brings enough supply to keep up with rabid demand is entirely up in the air. Keep your eyes on us for our full benchmark reviews on the chips coming very soon.

Dallin Grimm
Contributing Writer

Dallin Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Dallin has a handle on all the latest tech news. 

  • Crazyy8
    Seems like it'll be another leap in performance and cache, but who will buy these? The 9800X3D and 7800X3D still perform well enough. I'll stick with what I have, though I'm glad innovation is happening(unlike the GPU market)
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Crazyy8 said:
    Seems like it'll be another leap in performance and cache, but who will buy these? The 9800X3D and 7800X3D still perform well enough. I'll stick with what I have, though I'm glad innovation is happening(unlike the GPU market)

    Who will buy them? Those that haven't upgraded to the AM5 platform yet. Or those tired of heating their house with Intel radiators?

    I'm still using a 5950X and, thus far, haven't seen a reason to upgrade. But when I do, it'll likely be after the successor to the 99xx CPUs comes out and it'll probably be a 9900X or 9950X.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Crazyy8 said:
    Seems like it'll be another leap in performance and cache, but who will buy these? The 9800X3D and 7800X3D still perform well enough. I'll stick with what I have, though I'm glad innovation is happening(unlike the GPU market)
    Anyone that needs the cores, rather obviously? If you can't think of a reason, then these are not for you and that is ok (talking to the general audience).

    Particularly for my use case: I'd like to have the extra cores, but I don't want to pay TR-Pro prices for something I like doing on the side. I do a lot of software encoding and run multiple things that require a decent amount of cores, but not too punishing on memory bandwidth, so I can get away with DDR5 throughput.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Crazyy8 said:
    Seems like it'll be another leap in performance and cache, but who will buy these? The 9800X3D and 7800X3D still perform well enough. I'll stick with what I have, though I'm glad innovation is happening(unlike the GPU market)
    They are niche CPUs but great for some people who want the high multi-thread performance, or will manually tweak to ensure the right set of cores are used.

    Hope to see unified 12-core CCX with Zen 6, shaking up Ryzen core counts for the first time since Zen 2.
    Reply
  • Crystalizer
    SomeoneElse23 said:
    Who will buy them? Those that haven't upgraded to the AM5 platform yet. Or those tired of heating their house with Intel radiators?

    I'm still using a 5950X and, thus far, haven't seen a reason to upgrade. But when I do, it'll likely be after the successor to the 99xx CPUs comes out and it'll probably be a 9900X or 9950X.
    I'm also at 5950x. Some of the software benefit greatly from this kind of upgrade. Like game engines, 3d software, video editing and code compilers.
    From games perspective. Massively better loading times on single player games (my ssd is fast and bottlenecked by cpu). Also some strategy games that has a large number of units. Also running on weaker cpu is always a risk that some good new games have some unoptimized parts and having the fastest cpu will fix those error from your life.
    Needless to say I have been looking for this upgrade almost a 6 months now.
    Reply
  • Crazyy8
    -Fran- said:
    Anyone that needs the cores, rather obviously? If you can't think of a reason, then these are not for you and that is ok (talking to the general audience).
    I get the niche. As you said, someone needing X3D performance and tons of cores at a relatively cheap price. The CPUs are just a bit too expensive to be mainstream gaming chips like the #800X3Ds. Personally, if I had the money, I would buy them(but I don't have money).
    Reply
  • Beartooth99
    I may be taking a look at the 9900X3D. Still running an aging 3900X here
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Running both 5950X and 7950X, Zen 4 vs Zen 3 was a nice performance uplift, but meant compromizing on RAM capacity (96GB ECC in dual DDR5 DIMM instead of 128 ECC in quad DIMM for DDR4).

    With only ~10% performance uplift for Zen 5, I'm not in a hurry to upgrade, Zen 6 seems a more attractive target.

    I'd really love to see an affordable quad channel solution from AMD, Strix Point is a bit niche and I'd rather have the lanes for a dGPU than the iGPU.
    Reply