AMD claims Panther Lake has 'too much baggage' for handheld PC use — fights back after Intel jabs AMD for using 'ancient silicon' in its Z2 series APUs
Calling Z2 ancient is comedic when the flagship model comes with AMD's latest Zen 5 architecture.
CES 2026 has brought us a wealth of friendly back-and-forth jabbing between AMD and Intel, and this latest piece is no exception. PCWorld reports that AMD has clapped back at Intel after it claimed its Z2 chips were based on "ancient silicon," riposting that its Panther Lake mobile chips carry too much baggage to be suitable for handheld use. AMD even backed up its claims with a lab test (sort of).
The rebuttal occurred during a roundtable interview with AMD's senior VP and GM of client business, Rahul Tikoo. PCWorld recorded Tikoo's response to Intel's aforementioned claim after the news outlet asked about AMD's future plans in the handheld space.
AMD claims that its handheld-specific chip has a much higher chance of success in the handheld market. "You can’t just use mobile silicon and put it in the handheld. You can, but the handheld or the consoles, they care about high graphics. They don’t care about as much compute, and they don’t care about the I/O."
AMD further clarified that Panther Lake is like a Swiss Army Knife that is "good for certain things." It admitted that AMD provides chips that operate like Swiss Army Knives, too, and even has its more conventional mobile CPUs in some handheld systems. But in general, AMD claims that this is more of an exception and that the core handheld gaming industry wants "...purpose-designed, purpose-built chips that have great graphics technology, great software like FSR, integration with game developers on Xbox, PlayStation, etc."
To prove its point, Tikoo told a story of a customer who claimed that they could get more battery life with Intel Lunar Lake chips compared to the Ryzen AI 300 series. AMD opted to test the customer's claims in a lab and found that "...As soon as you go in DC Mode, battery life climbs while performance drops. The Core i7 performs like a Core i3."
"So, the E-cores are very good for efficiency, very bad for performance. We balance the two, and we’re already making those choices for our customers and saying, hey, you don’t have to worry about it.”
The Core Ultra 3 series represents the fastest and most power-efficient mobile chips Intel has pumped out yet. On the gaming side of things, the X-branded Core Ultra 7 and 9 trims take advantage of Intel's fastest integrated graphics chip yet, the Xe3 Arc B390. Intel claims the GPU can perform at the same level as Nvidia's RTX 4050 laptop GPU, but at a much lower power envelope. We were able to test Panther Lake in a multitude of games, and found the Xe3 GPU can perform at well over 60 FPS at 1080p with XeSS upscaling mixed in.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Intel's jab at AMD, calling its Z2 chips "ancient silicon," is truly comedic, given how only one of the models uses Zen 2, but these little arguments demonstrate how truly competitive AMD and Intel are against each other in the CPU space right now. AMD is unfazed by Intel's new Panther Lake chips and has already stated that its outgoing Ryzen AI Max (Strix Halo) APUs already compete against Panther Lake with better (alleged) GPU performance. AMD even opted to update its Strix Halo lineup during CES to include a new 8-core and 12-core model that boasts the same 40CU RDNA3+ flagship iGPU that was exclusive to the flagship 16-core 395 model.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
dCasualGamer When the competitor responded immediately with a jab, it probably means there are some truth in the claim. Can't wait to see the real productsReply -
TerryLaze Reply
AMD claims that its handheld-specific chip has a much higher chance of success in the handheld market. "You can’t just use mobile silicon and put it in the handheld. You can, but the handheld or the consoles, they care about high graphics. They don’t care about as much compute, and they don’t care about the I/O.""So, the E-cores are very good for efficiency, very bad for performance. We balance the two, and we’re already making those choices for our customers and saying, hey, you don’t have to worry about it.”
So you don't need that much compute but if you use e-cores that give good battery life you don't get as much performance because you don't need that much compute????
Hey, just don't worry about it! -
Gururu The press has been somewhat kind to Intel. But AMD really fumbled CES 2026, so I am not sure why they can't just take the high road.Reply
AMD Failed UsAMD is In Danger
Intel Pulls an NVIDIAIntel’s Best Product in YEARS - Panther Lake Announcement -
User of Computers "AMD claims that its handheld-specific chip has a much higher chance of success in the handheld market. "You can’t just use mobile silicon and put it in the handheld. You can, but the handheld or the consoles, they care about high graphics. They don’t care about as much compute, and they don’t care about the I/O.""Reply
Uh huh. Are we just going to pretend like every single AMD handheld chip was repurposed from some other application? from the reused Rembrandt die to the Strix bin to the Pheonix chip, the Z2 series is very much a series of cut down bins from previous (and current) generations. Intel isn't doing anything radical here by introducing a binned PTL SKU that focuses more on handhelds but isn't directly new silicon. -
User of Computers Reply
to be fair, Intel was expected to at least talk about G31 so that was a disappointment from them.Gururu said:The press has been somewhat kind to Intel. But AMD really fumbled CES 2026, so I am not sure why they can't just take the high road.
AMD Failed UsAMD is In Danger
Intel Pulls an NVIDIAIntel’s Best Product in YEARS - Panther Lake Announcement -
Gururu Reply
If you mean the B770, yes I scrubbed all CES coverage waiting for that and VERY disappointed.User of Computers said:to be fair, Intel was expected to at least talk about G31 so that was a disappointment from them. -
User of Computers "So, the E-cores are very good for efficiency, very bad for performance. We balance the two, and we’re already making those choices for our customers and saying, hey, you don’t have to worry about it."Dang, I guess the fact that Skymont nearly matches Zen 4 in SPECint in IPC got you a bit nervous? (https://old.chipsandcheese.com/2024/12/20/skymont-in-desktop-form-atom-unleashed/)Reply -
User of Computers Reply
at this point I'd honestly just expect some token launch of a B70 Pro card instead of anything targeted at gamers.Gururu said:If you mean the B770, yes I scrubbed all CES coverage waiting for that and VERY disappointed. -
JamesJones44 I'm so surprised!! A competitor says their product is better than the competitors product!Reply -
Gururu Reply
That would upset my plans for acquiring a 5070 ti level card for under $400 this year :PUser of Computers said:at this point I'd honestly just expect some token launch of a B70 Pro card instead of anything targeted at gamers.