AMD executives react to Nvidia’s RTX Spark — ‘you’re just wrong if you don’t get a Strix Halo notebook’

AMD logo
(Image credit: Getty / Cheng Xin)

Regardless of your opinion of Nvidia’s RTX Spark, there’s no doubt that it’s the most consequential consumer announcement to come out of Computex 2026. Unlike Intel, which told Tom’s Hardware it’s handling the launch with “a healthy dose of paranoia,” AMD’s executives are confident that its Strix Halo and upcoming Gorgon Halo products will compete well with the N1X and N1 under the RTX Spark brand.

“I’m really excited that Nvidia has joined the game. You know, we were the only game in town for almost two years now, and the large local memory is becoming super critical in the agentic AI [workloads],” said AMD’s Rahul Tikoo, senior vice president and general manager of AMD’s client business. “I'm actually happy to see Nvidia join the race for these great products.”

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

  • usertests
    “I’m actually curious about what done, but when I look at their specs, their specs are 128 gigs of local memory. We’ve done it on Strix Halo. Their specs are a 20-core CPU. We have a 16-core / 32-thread CPU in here,” Tikoo said. “So, if you just compare the specs, I don’t see… now, Gorgon Halo, which is coming out in Q3, is going to be a better product.”
    Strix/Gorgon Halo can't be considered a gaming platform because of inflated prices. That leaves AI, and RDNA3.5 is way behind RDNA4/5 in AI performance per CU, as well as Spark. But Spark's theoretical performance is often held back by having similar memory bandwidth to Strix/Gorgon Halo.

    I could see someone talking themselves into going AMD for its broad x86 compatibility.
    Reply
  • RagingAardvark
    They'll never admit it, but the SW ecosystem gap is still HUGE. I saw how the sausage is made at AMD, and even when they have better HW specs they can not compare to Nvidia for AI SW stacks. We had to beg borrow and plead to get any perf libraries supported with ROCm. Basically you've got two choices with AMD for AI/ML:
    1) Use Microsoft's HW-agnostic libraries (and AMD has a good team working with them).
    2) Use only bare bones SW libraries that ROCm will support on a specific SKU, but forget using any perf libraries for performance or memory reduction. We were desperate to get any support for FlashAttention(1) on Radeon, while FlashAttention3 was already supported on CUDA.

    Want to do inference? Fine, you can do that (mostly) with AMD. Want to do almost anything more? Just use NVidia. I yanked out my AMD GPUs and rolled back to a 5 year old 12GB NV card to do basic training tasks out of sheer frustration. Was it slow? Yes. Did it work? YES! Couldn't say that about AMD.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    usertests said:
    can't be considered a gaming platform because of inflated prices
    thats like saying a maxed out imac isnt an imac because its vastly mroe expensive than the base model..

    "gaming" tax has always existed.
    the fact that its more costly doesnt mean it isnt a gaming platform (i mean just because a 5090 is so costly doesnt mena its not a gaming gpu)..it just emans its got a high cost.

    while it will likely beat amd in "ai" like features (as few spend mroe on that stuff than nvidia) in stuff not using that it will likely perform worse. (and again this is vs already out stuff not whatever is upcoming from apple/amd and doubt nvidia is going to update this regularly like they do)
    Reply
  • usertests
    hotaru251 said:
    thats like saying a maxed out imac isnt an imac because its vastly mroe expensive than the base model..

    "gaming" tax has always existed.
    the fact that its more costly doesnt mean it isnt a gaming platform (i mean just because a 5090 is so costly doesnt mena its not a gaming gpu)..it just emans its got a high cost.

    while it will likely beat amd in "ai" like features (as few spend mroe on that stuff than nvidia) in stuff not using that it will likely perform worse. (and again this is vs already out stuff not whatever is upcoming from apple/amd and doubt nvidia is going to update this regularly like they do)
    Gaming is just not the relevant use case for Strix Halo right now. You don't get these boxes with 128 GB RAM (soon 192 GB with Gorgon) for gaming, you get em for AI. But the Halo/Sparks with lesser 32 GB are also inflated in price from what I've seen, and people should head for laptops with dGPUs instead. In the handheld realm, Panther Lake looks superior on performance at low/typical TDPs, and Strix Halo handhelds saw massive price hikes a couple months ago.

    AYANEO NEXT 2 with Ryzen AI Max+ “Strix Halo” costs up to $4,299, weighs 1.4kg, and may require airline approval formsAYANEO suspends NEXT 2 sales, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 handheld cost now too high
    Strix Halo feels like a beta test of the new InFO-oS "sea of wires" packaging that will be used with Zen 6 desktop CPUs. RDNA3.5 is showing its age. But it is going to be the correct product for some people even at $4k+. And if prices plummeted, then it would be great for many people. But I think Medusa Halo, whenever it comes out, will solve some of Strix's problems.

    Nvidia showed a Spark roadmap with 2 additional generations based on Rubin and Feynman. Coming in 2028 and 2030 if I'm reading it right.
    Reply
  • kealii123
    "You know, we were the only game in town for almost two years now"

    Apple: "Am I a joke to you? "
    Reply
  • kealii123
    But seriously, once you meet some minimum basic requirements, the #1 thing influencing the speed of LLMs is the memory speed, and these two have exactly the same.

    Meanwhile apple silicon devices can be triple or quadruple the memory bandwidth.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    kealii123 said:
    Apple: "Am I a joke to you? "
    they were.
    gaming on apple is still bad (playable but for $ you putting down its bad) even on the HALO products.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Not sure how popular Strix Halo is, the coverage treats it with gloves and keeps it in the closet. There are some legit concerns being raised about the lack of RTX Spark performance data. All hype and no results might make for quite the popularity descent as we reach Fall.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    usertests said:
    Strix/Gorgon Halo can't be considered a gaming platform because of inflated prices. That leaves AI, and RDNA3.5 is way behind RDNA4/5 in AI performance per CU, as well as Spark. But Spark's theoretical performance is often held back by having similar memory bandwidth to Strix/Gorgon Halo.

    I could see someone talking themselves into going AMD for its broad x86 compatibility.
    Wait until you see the prices nVidia want you to pay for the N1X.

    Remember Jensen thinks we all have $10K battlestations at home. Think about that for a second.

    Strix Halo can absolutely game and very well. nVidia showed jack at their presentation about actual games, ergo they haven't been able to make them run reliably. You know how much Jensen loves demo'ing stuff during his ego-trips on stage. Gorgon Halo will be even better, so I doubt AMD has much to worry about it.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • jp7189
    x86 or CUDA. Personally, I think anyone doing AI isn't doing much of it on a laptop, and even if they are, its not dedicated to the task. So, I think x86 compatibility will count for a lot for all the other stuff you might want to use a laptop for.
    Reply