Apple's 18-core M5 Max beats 96-core Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX in Geekbench due to weak benchmark scaling — GPU performance is much less impressive [Updated]

Apple
(Image credit: Apple)

Edit 3/8/2026 7:25am ET: Clarified the nature of the benchmark win in the title and moved the analysis of poor scaling to the second paragraph.

Apple's desktop and notebook processors traditionally lead the pack in single-thread workloads, as industry-leading single-thread performance has been the company's focus for a long time. However, Apple's M5 Max processors not only outperform rivals by a huge margin in single-thread workloads, but beat all of them — including the 96-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX — in multi-thread workloads in the Geekbench 6 benchmark.

There is a major catch here as the Geekbench 6 multi-thread benchmark is a brief, bursty test intended to mimic common consumer tasks such as archive compression, PDF processing, and image editing. Its short runtime and bursty nature prevent it from fully stressing ultra-high-core-count processors like the Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Gururu
    Why is there a comparison between a laptop integrated GPU and a 5090? Its faster than 8060s and panther lake (probably), leave it at that and call it the fastest CPU in the world.
    Reply
  • andrewzortiz
    I decided to create this account to just leave this comment. This is the most click bait article I've ever seen from Tom's Hardware. Please do better.
    Reply
  • TheyStoppedit
    There's something we aren't being told. If a 6,000 dollar laptop with an M5 Max can slaughter a $15,000 desktop CPU that has 5x the core count, and 3x the power draw, then there has to be something we aren't being told. I would like to know what that is.... because that doesn't just happen. Is AMD really 10 years behind apple like that? I somehow doubt that. I'd like to know all the details.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    Geekbench heavily favors ARM and it doesn’t actually scale hardly at all with real workloads. If you look at the tests listed in the article, it’s very obviously aimed at testing cellphones.
    Reply
  • moon2
    It's hidden in the article - geek bench doesn't scale well beyond 32 cores. Presumably that means comparisons beyond 32 core are effectively junk.

    Maybe they could run four copies of geekbench concurrently and see which CPU as actually scales best - or just run workloads appropriate for a 96 core machine
    Reply
  • Alguem000
    AppleBench
    Reply
  • PEnns
    Amazing!!! I am so amazed, I am in amazement heaven.....

    Now do tell us how that Apple chip bulldozed a comparable IBM chip...or is that reserved only for AMD and Intel is a no-no in such scenarios??
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Gururu said:
    Why is there a comparison between a laptop integrated GPU and a 5090? Its faster than 8060s and panther lake (probably), leave it at that and call it the fastest CPU in the world.
    Aye most things are not 5090, if it is that fast that a comparison between it and the 5090 is valid comparison then they have made something rather special.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Do better Anton...
    Reply
  • andrewzortiz
    Deleted member 2824971 said:
    I wouldn't agree, because it's both obviously clickbait and expected performance.

    Real clickbait plays with the really unexpected and is subtle enough to lead you where you'd never go normally.

    Could they do better? Zero doubt! Too bad that doesn't pay, but then I block their ads.
    It's not really expected performance since it's not common knowledge that Geekbench is limited to 32 cores and the author doesn't care to explain it till really late into the article. This makes it really unexpected in your criteria of click bait. I also said this was the most clickbait article on Tom's Hardware, cause it wasn't subtle.

    The problem for me is when I read that headline I would definitely believe it is clickbait. But if it's posted from a reputable brand like Tom's Hardware, I would never believe they would pull this kind of Tom Foolery clickbait onto us. I might just be out of the loop on this, but has Tom's Hardware been going downhill?
    Reply