Core Ultra 5 245HX blasts past desktop counterpart in PassMark — mobile Arrow Lake chip is up to 40% faster than the Core i5-14500HX

Alder Lake
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel's latest mid-range Core Ultra 5 245HX Arrow Lake laptop chip has been benchmarked in PassMark, boasting some surprising results. According to PassMark results posted by "X86 is dead&back" on X, the 14-core mobile Arrow Lake chip is 8% quicker than the desktop Core Ultra 5 245.

The data shown in the X post reveals that the Core Ultra 5 245HX posted a single-core benchmark result of 4,409 points and a multi-core benchmark of 41,045 points. The desktop Core Ultra 5 245 (the non-K version) posted an inferior score of 4,409 points and 37,930 points in the single- and multi-core tests. As a result, the Core Ultra 5 245HX is 7% faster in single-core and 8% quicker in multi-core compared to its desktop equivalent.

Intel's speedy Arrow Lake mobile chip also handily outperforms its mobile and desktop predecessors in the same benchmark. The Core Ultra 5 245HX is 19% faster in single-core and a whopping 30% faster in multi-core compared to the Intel Core i5-14500. The disparity is even greater compared to the mobile equivalent, the Core i5-14500HX; the Core Ultra 5 245HX is 30% faster in single-core and 41% faster in multi-core than the 14500HX.

Core Ultra 5 245HX Benchmarks

Swipe to scroll horizontally

CPU

Single-Core

Multi-Core

Core Ultra 5 245HX

4,706

41,045

Core Ultra 5 245

4,409

37,930

Core i5-14500HX

3,608

29,089

Core i5-14500

3,955

31,684

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

4,431

39,995

The Core Ultra 5 245HX's peppy results are so good that the chip also outperforms AMD's flagship Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the best CPU for gaming in both multi-core and single-core tests, just barely.

Obviously, take these results with a grain of salt. PassMark is just one benchmark and will not represent the full capabilities of each CPU. For example, even though the 245HX outperforms the 9800X3D, we would never expect the 245HX to outperform the 9800X3D in gaming due to each chip's significantly different architectures. From our testing, we already know the 9800X3D outperforms the much faster Core Ultra 9 285K in gaming by a significant margin, so there's no way the 245HX would touch the 9800X3D in gaming.

Still, the fact that the 245HX does so well suggests Intel's mid-range mobile Arrow Lake chip will approach desktop-class performance in at least a few workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245HX's specs back this up with a maximum clock speed of 5.1 GHz, and a mixture of six P-cores and eight E-cores, which are identical to its desktop counterpart. The Core Ultra 5 245HX has a higher power limit than its desktop counterpart. Maximum turbo power is rated at up to 160W for the 245HX; the desktop 245's equivalent maximum turbo power limit only goes up to 121W.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • helper800
    This is either very good for Intel or very odd for passmark assuming these numbers are even real.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    Makes sense. 245 has a PL2 of 121W, whereas the HX SKU has a PL2 of 160W. Single core is a little ??? though.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    User of Computers said:
    Makes sense. 245 has a PL2 of 121W, whereas the HX SKU has a PL2 of 160W. Single core is a little ??? though.
    Yeah, but the purported single-thread score difference is rather more perplexing, given they both allegedly boost to 5.1 GHz. That discrepancy really calls for some deeper analysis, to confirm the result is real and see what's actually going on.

    I think it's most likely some inconsistency or problem related to the test setup. If it's it a real and consistent result, then it'd definitely be worth finding out what's behind it.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
    Reply
  • Notton
    That single core score is baffling. I thought they were the same die and hence have the same cache and layout?
    The only difference is the 245HK GPU is 48EU vs 64EU on 245K.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    User of Computers said:
    Makes sense. 245 has a PL2 of 121W, whereas the HX SKU has a PL2 of 160W. Single core is a little ??? though.
    with my intel T cpus. Increasing The power make the score higher, even with locked clocks... 13600T on wirar original got 18.000 pts with 100w 24.000 pts
    Reply