Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Ryzen 7 7840U have an iGPU-bound benchmarking rematch in Linux
Following their previous CPU-only Linux benchmarking, Phoronix runs Meteor Lake Arc Graphics vs. RDNA 3 iGPUs on Linux
Just yesterday, we looked into Phoronix's 370 CPU benchmark run of the Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 7840U under Linux. Phoronix has now followed up on this CPU testing with benchmarks now focused on iGPU performance, which start making the Intel CPU look a lot more compelling in Linux than it did prior. Both CPUs were (and are still) being tested in an Acer Swift Go 14 laptop (Intel) and a Framework laptop (AMD), respectively.
While the CPU benchmark results gave AMD a roughly 28% overall lead, things may dice out a little differently with the iGPUs involved.
View Original
View Original
With iGPUs in play, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H reveals itself as holder of the iGPU performance crown under Ubuntu Linux. AMD isn't far behind, the Radeon 780M does indeed lose to Meteor Lake's Arc graphics by 8% on average. The Iris Xe graphics on the Core i7 1280P, meanwhile, are being hard-diffed by 62%, which is pretty nice.
While AMD is sure to retaliate, Intel's Arc iGPUs are starting to put up some real competition against AMD in this integrated GPU space.
When Phoronix shifts over to testing Intel iGPUs only in GPU compute benchmarks under Linux, the performance improvements over last-gen become even more clear. Arc graphics are now clearing Iris Xe graphics with an over two-fold improvement.
Finally, while CPU power consumption was higher for the Core Ultra 7 155H in CPU-bound testing, power consumption was actually lower than AMD for this CPU in this iGPU benchmark run. For more detailed data points on the tests run and particular workloads that favor AMD, consider Phoronix's full piece.
For now, it's fair to say that Meteor Lake Intel CPUs are looking a lot better for Linux now that we can see how much iGPU scaling has improved. Beating the Radeon 780M iGPU is pretty impressive, too, considering it's capable of powering modern ~1200p gaming experiences on devices like the ROG Ally.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.
-
-Fran- Wait, worse CPU but better iGPU?Reply
You know what that reminds me of? Trinity and all Pilediver based APUs.
"But no, that's DIFFERENT!". Ok, sure.
Regards. -
bit_user Reply
Yes, though I think the Windows benchmarks might be a little more balanced between the Ryzen 7840U and the Core Ultra 7 155H:-Fran- said:Wait, worse CPU but better iGPU?
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Swift-Go-14-review-The-Meteor-Lake-Core-Ultra-7-impresses-with-its-AI-core.783349.0.html
The first few benchmarks all seem to favor Meteor Lake. It's not until you hit LibreOffice, R, and the AIDA64 synthetic benchmarks that the tide turns in favor of Ryzen. -
cyrusfox Linux is missing the thread director, and I believe that is likely torpedoing the cpu benchmark comparison on the Linux system, I still fully expect Intel to lose to AMD on mobile, but not by the margins the first test showed. A lot of those losses may be from linux loading up the SOC e-cores when they have no business running high priority threads. As the linux Kernel adapts to this tiered computing hierarchy, the discrepancy chasm will close.Reply -
bit_user Reply
No, I'm pretty sure they added support for it in early 2022. It did lag the launch of Alder Lake, but not by a whole lot.cyrusfox said:Linux is missing the thread director,
Phoronix just posted a performance comparison of the same Meteor Lake laptop on Linux and Windows. I wish it also included the Ryzen 7840U, but alas it did not. Meteor Lake performed significantly better on Linux. In the conclusion, the author states:cyrusfox said:I believe that is likely torpedoing the cpu benchmark comparison on the Linux system,
"This lead isn't as wide as we've seen on some higher core count systems but overall Linux had a strong showing in the CPU tests for the most part. This was good to see as there was some curiosity on whether the Linux kernel is behaving optimally yet for Meteor Lake CPUs but even with the single-threaded tests I didn't run into any awkward situations yet. Though with Linux results proving competitive, it does for the most part rule out Linux being to blame for the poor CPU performance benchmarks on Meteor Lake."
Source: https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-meteorlake-windows-linux
Agreed. I had similar thoughts. I also wondered if Meteor Lake's enhanced Thread Director might not be fully supported, although Intel is usually pretty good about getting all the necessary patches merged well in advance of new product launches.cyrusfox said:I still fully expect Intel to lose to AMD on mobile, but not by the margins the first test showed. A lot of those losses may be from linux loading up the SOC e-cores when they have no business running high priority threads.
Still, I would not be surprised if some future patches make Meteor Lake a lot more competitive in Linux. We'll see.
ARM has been doing big.Little for over a decade. Linux is the kernel Android uses. Alder Lake launched over 2 years ago. So, I think the kernel is most of the way up that learning curve.cyrusfox said:As the linux Kernel adapts to this tiered computing hierarchy, the discrepancy chasm will close.