Intel hires Morgan Stanley to protect itself against activist investors
Why?
Intel is collaborating with Morgan Stanley to prepare for potential activist investor challenges, reports CNBC. Although no formal activist campaigns have been launched, Intel is taking steps to protect itself amid intensified competition with AMD, Arm, and Nvidia and financial struggles.
It's hard to pinpoint Intel's rationale for the defense. The elephant in the room is, of course, Intel's manufacturing division and its potential spinoff, something that chief executive Pat Gelsinger strongly opposes. Technically, it is the second largest foundry in the world in terms of revenue (simply because it produces all of Intel's processors), a world behind TSMC, but it is well ahead of Samsung Foundry and SMIC. With a potential 'Intel product company' as its main customer and several external clients, this is a strong contender in the contract manufacturing market.
But Intel's foundry division lost some $2.8 billion in the second quarter alone. One may argue that Intel essentially reassigned all the losses to the foundry division outside of its product division. Furthermore, that unit invested heavily in ultra-expensive High-NA EUV tools. Intel's data center and AI business generate just a little more sales than the data center business of its arch-rival AMD, which holds a considerably lower data center market share by volume.
Given the aforementioned factors, Intel's manufacturing unit looks like an attractive investment. Considering this fact, we can only wonder whether an activist investor would ask to spin off the manufacturing unit to potentially get a higher valuation of the two separate companies.
In response to the current challenges, Intel has initiated significant cost-cutting measures, including reducing its workforce by 15%, which amounts to approximately 15,000 jobs. These cuts are part of its $10 billion savings plan that involves keeping the company and its product development and manufacturing unit together.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Marlin1975 Seems they are more worried about the stock price/control of the company than turning it around.Reply -
vanadiel007 I see them go into bankruptcy protection next. They are loosing market value and market share at an alarming rate and don't seem to have any direct plans besides "saving money" to turn it around.Reply
Unless they are still banking on ARC GPU's, but I think that bird has never taken off. -
Avro Arrow "Intel's data center and AI business generate just a little more sales than the data center business of its arch-rival AMD, which holds a considerably lower data center market share by volume."Reply
Yeah, we'll see just how long this lasts because the market has been moving towards EPYC more or less since its inception. -
Kondamin The whole thing smells like a setup from the start, having them over stretch with government grants all over the world so they are 50billion in the hole and then collectively attacking them so they go down.Reply
if the US is smart they bail them out -
dweb p Can anyone, even MorganStanley protect any corporate entity, even Intel, from Blackrock's woke blackmail?Reply
Recent Intel blunders have an eerie resemblance to Boeing and Disney. -
Kondamin
I doubt you are allowed in a clean room without a degree, you might be allowed in HR, PR, Finance...dweb p said:Can anyone, even MorganStanley protect any corporate entity, even Intel, from Blackrock's woke blackmail?
Recent Intel blunders have an eerie resemblance to Boeing and Disney. -
Avro Arrow
That's corporate America for ya.Marlin1975 said:Seems they are more worried about the stock price/control of the company than turning it around.
I would be really shocked if Intel went bankrupt. They have their fingers in many more pies than CPUs and GPUs.vanadiel007 said:I see them go into bankruptcy protection next. They are loosing market value and market share at an alarming rate and don't seem to have any direct plans besides "saving money" to turn it around.
Unless they are still banking on ARC GPU's, but I think that bird has never taken off.
That's all the American taxpayers need, more socialism for the rich while they themselves get nothing. If the US is smart, they'll implement universal healthcare before giving greedy executives more assurance that American taxpayers will bail them out if they're incompetent.Kondamin said:The whole thing smells like a setup from the start, having them over stretch with government grants all over the world so they are 50billion in the hole and then collectively attacking them so they go down.
if the US is smart they bail them out
What the US government needs to do is let a huge corporation fail because that will send a message to the other huge corporations that they better smarten up because they won't be bailed out anymore.
Intel isn't in danger of failing. They're just losing market share in CPUs. They still do lots of other things like Motherboards, RAM, GPUs, Network Adapters, etc. -
DavidC1
You do know majority of their revenue is from their CPUs? Their GPU revenue is negligible.Avro Arrow said:That's corporate America for ya.
I would be really shocked if Intel went bankrupt. They have their fingers in many more pies than CPUs and GPUs.
They have massive debt and raptorlake degradation to deal with. They are in a really bad position. Worst in the history of the company. When US collapses they'll be among the first to go.
Ah blame the rich. The problem with socialism isn't the rich businessman but the government, like it always have been.Avro Arrow said:That's all the American taxpayers need, more socialism for the rich while they themselves get nothing. If the US is smart, they'll implement universal healthcare before giving greedy executives more assurance that American taxpayers will bail them out if they're incompetent. -
stuff and nonesense
They have cash, they have markets but if they are losing market share in .. say.. CPUs, that means fewer motherboards. If they are losing market share in server, then Optane / memory and motherboards don’t sell. That leaves GPUs and networking, I’m sure they can sell parts to competitors but their core will be gutted unless they can turn around the issues that have caused the share price falls.Avro Arrow said:Intel isn't in danger of failing. They're just losing market share in CPUs. They still do lots of other things like Motherboards, RAM, GPUs, Network Adapters, etc. -
Kondamin
OTAvro Arrow said:
That's all the American taxpayers need, more socialism for the rich while they themselves get nothing. If the US is smart, they'll implement universal healthcare before giving greedy executives more assurance that American taxpayers will bail them out if they're incompetent.
Healthcare doesn't need to be 'socialized' in the US it's already socialized but in the worst possible way for the taxpayer. ~$1.5trillion in taxes per year go directly into healthcare that's ignoring the rest of the +4 trillion that goes to social security.
And a ~3trillion to keep the rest running
Healthcare needs to be reformed.
On Intel,
intel is in a 50billion hole makeing it very vunerable to sharks that want to destroy it to make a quick buck.
It's an extremely important company for the nation and as you know it's in not to that bad a shape.
It needs some protection and in a couple of years those investments will start earning them money and by then they can pay the loan back.