Virtualized Windows 11 test shows Apple's M5 destroying Intel and AMD's best in single-core benchmark — Chinese enthusiast pits Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Core i9 14900KS against Apple's latest SoC

Apple M5 SoC
(Image credit: Apple)

Apple's processors are notorious for their high performance when running in their native environments: macOS and iOS. However, an experiment conducted by NPacific, a Chinese enthusiast (via HXL), shows that Apple's latest M5 processor can destroy high-end CPUs from AMD and Intel while running Windows 11 in virtualization mode. There is a catch, though: So far, the enthusiast has only benchmarked the M5 processor in CPU-Z, a synthetic benchmark.

Staying true to Apple's goal of developing processors with the maximum possible single-thread performance, the M5 system-on-a-chip (SoC) scores 1600.2 points in single-thread CPU-Z version 1.04.arm64 benchmark, assuming the results from an unknown enthusiast are to be believed. This is the highest single-thread score ever registered on a non-overclocked CPU in the CPU-Z database. To put it into context, Intel's Core i9-14900KS scores 952 points in this benchmark, whereas AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D achieves 867 points.

As it turns out, a custom Armv9 core from Apple running at up to 4.60 GHz can outstrip a Raptor Cove core by a whopping 68% and a Zen 5 core by astounding 84.5%, at least in this one benchmark. We do not know if Intel's and AMD's cores can actually achieve their 6.20 GHz and 5.70 GHz maximum boost clocks in CPU-Z, but the current result is fantastic for Apple.

When it comes to multi-thread performance in CPU-Z, the results are more of a mixed bag for Apple's M5. The CPU has 10 cores without simultaneous multi-threading, so the benchmark runs 10 threads on the processor, which scores 5976.2 points. Since AMD and Intel do not have high-performance client CPUs with 10 cores, it makes sense to compare Apple's M5 to CPUs running 8, 12, 16, or 20 threads.

Apple's M5 outperforms all CPUs running 8 threads, and its closest rival — Intel's Core i7-12700K — scored 5533 points. However, with its 12 threads, the CPU finds itself near AMD's eight-core Ryzen 9-7900X (5935 points) and well behind current-generation Ryzen 9900X or previous-generation Core i7-12700K (7550 points). With 16 threads, Apple's M5 result looks rather pale, on the level of Intel's Core i5-13450HX (5978 points), andwell behind AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

Since there is no CPU-Z compatible with macOS or iOS, we can only wonder whether the rather weak result of Apple's M5 is conditioned by its limited core count, lack of simultaneous multi-threading, or Windows 11's scheduler that does not know how to properly work with Apple Silicon CPUs in multi-threaded environments.

Keeping in mind that we are dealing with a synthetic benchmark run in virtualization mode, we can't really draw any solid conclusions from these results, except to note that Apple optimizes its SoCs to demonstrate maximum single-thread performance for higher power efficiency. That's not exactly anything new, but these results pique our interest, and we'd love to see the M5 tested in other benchmarks in Windows.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • rluker5
    If that is the M5 single thread, it looks like it is running only 4 cores.
    My 13900kf, which for some reason shows 5.5Ghz stock (maybe because I got it in first week?) gets 900 single and 6868 multi with e cores and HT off: https://valid.x86.fr/dnd2xt9x8 = 72. Multithread should be close to single thread x number of threads in a benchmark like this. 5976/1600 = 3.735. MT should be closer to 16000.

    Either the testing is fake, broken, or Apples multithreading is a new industry worst.
    And I'm sure ARL walks all over my 3 year old CPU.

    Edit: Looks like the M5 only has 4p cores. Guess I have egg on my face. Very impressive numbers if true.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Goes out of their way to run win11 virtual machine on a mac
    doesn't bench games
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    Single core performance is nearly meaningless in modern computing. I upgraded my old i7-4770k intel system because 4 cores wasn't enough for modern application and gaming performance outside of casual computing needs. I now have a current generation 12 core AMD and there are times I think more cores might still benefit getting things done in real world use.

    Apple can have bragging rights on some single core benchmark all they like, if you want real world performance for most things done on a computer these days including some gaming without an unlimited budget (wasting your money) I'm not sure Apple is a wise choice. You just get more for your money outside of the Apple ecosystem and more freedom to upgrade.
    Reply
  • DingusDog
    That amount of unbridled single core performance could get millions of fps in minesweeper.
    Reply
  • Psiboy69
    What a joke. 1. No-one has cared about single core performance for almost 20 years! 🤣
    2. Zero competition chosen as a reference on the screenshots. What are you/they afraid of? 3. Enough with pointless clickbait garbage journalism.
    Reply
  • Heat_Fan89
    Notton said:
    Goes out of their way to run win11 virtual machine on a mac
    doesn't bench games
    Exactly! It's like comparing vehicle MPG. Depending on several factors a car mfg can skew numbers which ever way they want in their favor. The real test is real world performance. Those who use the PC's for the basics, which is the vast majority, a low end PC will suffice.

    It's when you get to specific applications that become important. Mac's are not gaming machines, never have and never will be able to compete with Intel and AMD. So Apple can tout their latest and greatest SOC's as beating the latest Intel or AMD CPU's. But the tables are quickly turned on Apple's SOC's when it comes to gaming. There isn't a Mac configuration available today that can run a AAA title like Battlefield 6 or the latest COD in 4K @ 60FPS in high-end or ultra mode. GTA6 on a Mac, forget it

    These benchmarks are useless except for the Apple cult who get all lathered up from the results. And this is coming from someone who uses a Mac. I could only chuckle when Mac users were spending thousands configuring a Mac Mini with an AMD eGPU then wondering why they were getting poor gaming performance.
    Reply
  • Ilmarix
    When it says virtualized windows 11, does it mean running arm64 version of windows and cpu-z, or did any of this benchmark run through x86 to arm64 emulation?
    Reply
  • upsetkiller
    Man all this jargon is infuriating, just like when apple thought geek bench is somehow representative of real world performance. This title is very eh, the test is meaningless. In real world scenarios no mobile chip is beating a state of the art desktop part in any area except efficiency
    Reply
  • Nanncee
    “but WHeRE ArE thE GamInG BencMarks”

    You guys do realize that a majority of the time people are sitting in front of a computer, they are not gaming, right?

    Apple isn’t trying to get the gaming market, they are going after everyday users who will spend a majority of their time within single thread of processing.

    “No one has cared about single core threading for 20 years”

    Way to out yourself for being ignorant. Go do some research on what applications/workflows still rly on single threads. Anything with real time audio, web processing, or general productivity software will greatly benefit from the fastest single core possible. Even these comments about gaming are wrong. While yes, many games in 25’ are using parallel processing techniques, every single game in existence will still benefit from a faster primary core and that’s just the reality of how processing works.
    Reply
  • techconc
    Zaranthos said:
    Single core performance is nearly meaningless in modern computing. I upgraded my old i7-4770k intel system because 4 cores wasn't enough for modern application and gaming performance outside of casual computing needs. I now have a current generation 12 core AMD and there are times I think more cores might still benefit getting things done in real world use.

    Apple can have bragging rights on some single core benchmark all they like, if you want real world performance for most things done on a computer these days including some gaming without an unlimited budget (wasting your money) I'm not sure Apple is a wise choice. You just get more for your money outside of the Apple ecosystem and more freedom to upgrade.
    Nearly everything web based, especially JavaScript, etc. is single threaded.
    Reply