AMD confirms its Radeon RX 5000, 6000 series cards will still get some new features 'as required by market needs' — company also says RX 7900 USB-C change was a mistake (Updated)

MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Recent updates

Update - 11:45 am ET, October 31: In a statement of clarification to Tom's Hardware, AMD says that "New features, bug fixes and game optimizations will continue to be delivered as required by market needs in the maintenance mode branch" to its RDNA 1 and 2-based GPUs, following community pushback and some confusion regarding its recent decision to put the cards in 'maintenance mode'. AMD had previously stated cards would "continue to receive driver updates for critical security and bug fixes." Full story here. The rest of yesterday's story remains as published.

Recent updates

Update - October 31 6 am ET: AMD has confirmed to Tom's Hardware that references in its latest Adrenalin driver update to USB-C functionality being removed on RX 7900 GPUs was a mistake. ". We’d like to inform you that the release notes for AMD Software Adrenalin Edition 25.10 2 posted today included misinformation that has since been corrected," the company told us in a statement. "There is no change to USB-C functionality on the RX 7900 series GPUs in the 25.10.2 driver. There was an incorrect line in the originally posted release notes that has been removed, and the release notes have been updated." The rest of the article remains below as published.

Why is AMD making these changes? It could certainly be down to the fact that AMD's graphics driver package is now too large to fit on two CD-ROMs. In the era of ubiquitous broadband internet, a 1.6GB driver package is arguably no big deal, but many people around the world still labor under the limitation of metered internet connections with limited transfer allowances. For reference, NVIDIA's graphics driver package is less than 900 megabytes, although some of that is no doubt because NVIDIA includes neither the Control Panel nor its new NVIDIA App in that download. For AMD's part, the company hints at focusing on its more recent product offerings as the recent for the change, as per the above statement.

Beyond those changes, the 25.10.2 driver release brings support for DirectX 12 Work Graphs to the Radeon RX 9000 series. Work Graphs are a little-used feature that essentially allows the GPU to act fully independently of the CPU by dispatching its own work. It's currently supported by Radeon RX 7000, GeForce RTX 30 series, and newer non-Intel GPUs; it's surprising to learn that Work Graphs were not supported on Radeon RX 9000 series parts until now.

A screenshot of the game FBC Firebreak depicting containment officers fighting a monster made of sticky notes.

Remedy's FBC Firebreak has seen significant updates since its launch. (Image credit: Remedy Entertainment)

Of course, as with any new driver release, AMD has packed in some bug fixes for the new bundle. Crashes in The Last of Us Part II, Remedy's co-op Control follow-up FBC Firebreak, and NBA 2K25's MyCareer mode should be resolved, while stuttering in Baldur's Gate 3, corruption in Serious Sam 4, and VR issues in VTOL VR should be all sewn up. Also, AMD seems to have resolved a problem where running VR headsets at 80 or 90 Hz could cause stuttering. Finally, no less than ten separate security issues have apparently been resolved in this driver.

Remaining known issues include a long-standing bug where Cyberpunk 2077 crashes when trying to play in RT Overdrive mode, intermittent crashes or driver timeouts in Battlefield 6 on certain integrated graphics, similar behavior in Roblox on RX 7000 GPUs, texture flickering in BF6 when using AMD Record and Stream, and missing Radeon Anti-Lag 2 in Counter-Strike 2 on Radeon RX 9000 series GPUs. AMD says to try switching to Vulkan (by adding -vulkan to your Steam launch options) if you must have Anti-Lag 2 support in CS2.

Now, AMD has confirmed the reason for the change. In AMD's defense, Battlefield 6 already runs pretty well on Radeon RX 6000 GPUs, so there's not exactly a pressing need for that update on those cards. Still, it would be awfully early for AMD to be dropping non-security driver update support for RDNA 2.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Zak Killian
Contributor

Zak is a freelance contributor to Tom's Hardware with decades of PC benchmarking experience who has also written for HotHardware and The Tech Report. A modern-day Renaissance man, he may not be an expert on anything, but he knows just a little about nearly everything.

  • -Fran-
    The USB thing is reather stupid and really strange... I'll class that as a "oops" moment from the AMD side... Or I hope it is... My laptop has the USB-C port in the back fed by the dGPU (6800M ~ 67000XT at 150W), so losing that port makes me NOT happy.

    In any case... I've noticed the increases in size for the drivers. It's rather annoying for sure. They're trying to shove so much garbage now as "software" with the drivers that it's just blown up in size. They need to put them on a diet, for sure.

    I'll stick to 25.9.1 as they've been very reliable for me and I don't see a need to upgrade just yet. Waifu games are not that demanding, lel.

    EDIT: Right, the "legacy" thing. The devil is always in the details: AMD moves the cards into that category for performance improvements, but keeps the software for those cards working until they are completely dropped from support. It's important to make the distinction here.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • helper800
    -Fran- said:
    Waifu games are not that demanding, lel.
    A cultured person indeed. :smirk:
    Reply
  • DS426
    Why is AMD making these changes? We don't know, and the company wasn't immediately available for comment. It could certainly be down to the fact that AMD's graphics driver package is now too large to fit on two CD-ROMs. In the era of ubiquitous broadband internet, a 1.6GB driver package is arguably no big deal, but many people around the world still labor under the limitation of metered internet connections with limited transfer allowances. For reference, NVIDIA's graphics driver package is less than 900 megabytes, although some of that is no doubt because NVIDIA includes neither the Control Panel nor its new NVIDIA App in that download. - this article
    Strange paragraph there. We can talk about how 1.6 GB won't fit on obsolete technologies all day. 1.44 MB floppies, anyone!? Even when graphics drivers were on CD's, I was downloading the latest drivers over the internet as best practice has always been to get the latest graphics drivers, chipset drivers, etc online. That was even with 56K dial-up up home, BTW.

    Not saying AMD's graphics drivers don't have some excess bloat. This is an offline installer, so everything is included, which is fine in some cases. Nowadays, most software installers are online when filesizes are larger, e.g. check the box for individual components and then some of that software is downloaded at the time of install. BTW, I think AMD is even including chipset drivers now, something those with Intel mobos should be able to uncheck before downloading, not after.

    EDIT: actually, I just took a look and I'm seeing the download at about 900 MB when downloading just the graphics driver package. The link provider in this article points to the "combined" package which includes the AMD NPU driver. Plain graphics driver package: https://drivers.amd.com/drivers/whql-amd-software-adrenalin-edition-25.10.2-win10-win11-oct-rdna3.exe
    Reply
  • usertests
    So I guess this means FSR4 is not officially coming to RDNA2?
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    Bit of an anti-consumer move.

    1) RDNA 2/3 hardware is still being released in APU's/Integrated graphics.
    2) RDNA 3 hardware is only 4 years old on the desktop.
    3) Disabling paid-for features on 2 year old GPU hardware is a garbage move.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Why is AMD making these changes?

    To sell GPUs. Like the HD 6000 series that was dropped less than 2 years after release, RX 6000 series is dropped less than 4 years after release. That's insane, but that's also what you get when you go with the "value alternative", and why I stopped supporting them after the Fury series after being exclusively Radeon since the 9600XT.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    Pemalite said:
    Bit of an anti-consumer move.

    1) RDNA 2/3 hardware is still being released in APU's/Integrated graphics.
    2) RDNA 3 hardware is only 4 years old on the desktop.
    3) Disabling paid-for features on 2 year old GPU hardware is a garbage move.
    RDNA 3 is only 3 years old and RDNA 2 is 5 years old.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    jeremyj_83 said:
    RDNA 3 is only 3 years old and RDNA 2 is 5 years old.

    But the RX 6000 and 5000 series aren't exactly performance slouches, especially at 1920x1080, as shown in TPU's review of the RX 9060 XT, the 6800 XT is still a near 120fps card on average, and the 5700XT, being about half as fast, is still acompetent 60fps area card, especially on less demanding games or with "AI" upscaling from FSR. Meanwhile nVidia is having no problems keeping 7 year old Turing cards updated.

    https://tpucdn.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-9060-xt-nitro-oc/images/average-fps-1920-1080.png
    Reply
  • jlake3
    -Fran- said:
    The USB thing is reather stupid and really strange... I'll class that as a "oops" moment from the AMD side... Or I hope it is... My laptop has the USB-C port in the back fed by the dGPU (6800M ~ 67000XT at 150W), so losing that port makes me NOT happy.
    I think this may be specific to the desktop cards? A small number of them had USB-C connectors that were intended for a new VR-focused USB-C alt mode, but development of the standard was discontinued several years ago and it was formally abandoned with no hardware ever released on the headset side. They're probably getting rid of driver support for that alt-mode because there aren't that many models that got the port, and it's actually impossible to use it as intended.

    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    But the RX 6000 and 5000 series aren't exactly performance slouches, especially at 1920x1080, as shown in TPU's review of the RX 9060 XT, the 6800 XT is still a near 120fps card on average, and the 5700XT, being about half as fast, is still acompetent 60fps area card, especially on less demanding games or with "AI" upscaling from FSR. Meanwhile nVidia is having no problems keeping 7 year old Turing cards updated.
    AMD is still providing driver updates to the RX 470/480, which are now 9 years old. They're less frequent and they're largely bugfix releases, but up until this spring I ran a RX 5700 and would benchmark it from time to time, and I haven't measured a statistically significant performance improvement since 23.11.1. These cards being put on the 'maintenence' driver track are likely as optimized as they're ever going to get.

    I can't say how Turing is doing, but I had a Maxwell card in a tinkering system and benched it here and there as well, and from 497.09 to 551.61 it did not seem to receive any meaningful optimizations or improvements. GPU-bound performance was basically static, while CPU overhead actually got worse. Even though it was getting updates, they weren't really any better than AMD's maintenence-track updates.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    This is a Windows exclusive.

    5000 and 6000 series cards are still well (ongoing) supported on Linux.
    Reply