AMD RX 9060 XT specs leak: Navi 44 takes on Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti with 8 and 16GB flavors, 3.2 GHz boost clocks
RDNA 4 for the masses.

A new leak from VideoCardz has detailed the alleged specifications of AMD's budget-oriented RX 9060 XT GPU from the RDNA 4 family. Reportedly, the RX 9060 XT marks the first use of the Navi 44 die, which is significantly cut down versus its elder sibling, Navi 48. Without official confirmation from AMD, it's hard to be certain about the exact specifications, so take this information with an appropriate dose of salt.
At the initial RDNA 4 unveiling in January, AMD confirmed the RX 9060 branding through one of its slides. With the RTX 5060 Ti around the corner, now is the perfect time to introduce RDNA 4 to the masses. Reportedly, there's also an RX 9070 GRE in the making, which is expected to sit between the RX 9060 XT and the RX 9070, aimed at the $400 market.
Taking a page from Nvidia's notebook, AMD is said to launch the RX 9060 XT in 8GB and 16GB versions. To be fair, this approach is quite analogous to the RX 7600 8GB and RX 7600 XT 16GB, featuring similar cores. The only difference is that both GPUs are now classified under the same XT-tier.
Based on the data supplied by VideoCardz, the RX 9060 XT offers 2,048 shader units (32 CUs), similar to its last-generation counterpart(s). We're likely seeing the full-fat Navi 44 core in effect here. The 128-bit interface allows for four memory ICs, explaining the 8GB and 16GB (clamshell) capacities. There is, however, a large bump to the clock speeds, with the RX 9060 XT rated at 3.2 GHz (+480 MHz higher than the 7600 XT), said to reach 3.3 GHz with custom models. The TGP remains unspecified, but expect it to be near 200W.
This doesn't leave much room for the RX 9060 non-XT, which may drop below 32 Compute Units. RDNA 4's architectural improvements might offset the core-count deficiency, but we don't know the exact numbers. The source claims that Navi 44 offers only three display connectors compared to four with Navi 48, while some rumors even suggest the lack of a video encoding engine like the RX 6500 XT, but that's yet to be confirmed.
The RTX 5060 Ti is rumored to be unveiled on Wednesday. Will AMD drop its RX 9060 family around the same time? It's hard to say. Computex starts in late May, but an announcement then would give Nvidia's mainstream counterpart a one-month head start. Pricing is likely not finalized at the time of this writing, though it's expected to fall between $300 and $400.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
Neilbob If we're going to be sticking with 8GB, then logically the price would be at 200 or less, yes?Reply
Yes, I think that's definitely what will happen.
Also, all pigs will grow wings and take off for Mars, with parting thanks for all the truffles. -
Notton I saw another site put the 9060XT/8GB at a price range of $270~300. The 16GB model with $330~380.Reply
Seeing as the RX7600XT ($330) is a little slower than the B580 ($250), and the 9070GRE is $400ish, I doubt they can price it on the high end. -
usertests
9070 GRE doesn't exist yet!Notton said:Seeing as the RX7600XT ($330) is a little slower than the B580 ($250), and the 9070GRE is $400ish, I doubt they can price it on the high end.
RDNA4 CUs are significantly faster than RDNA3, but 9060 XT will fall short of the 7700 XT which has 54 instead of 32. 7600 XT held most of its price throughout its lifetime. I think they can get away with $350 MSRP for 16 GB.
9060 XT 8GB will be technically good compared to the 8 GB cards that came before it, but uninspiring even at $270.
9070 GRE reportedly has 48 CUs and 12 GB. If it ever makes it out of the Chinese market at reasonable prices, could be good. But yields may not justify many of them being made instead of 9070 non-XTs. -
George³
Yes, moar Gigahertzs make it maybe little faster, but significantly is when playing with latest AFMF or with moar fake frames same as Nvidia.usertests said:RDNA4 CUs are significantly faster than RDNA3, -
usertests
The 7900 XTX is only about 5% faster (raster, no fake frames) than the 9070 XT, but the 7900 XTX has 50% more CUs. So yeah, it's significant.George³ said:Yes, moar Gigahertzs make it maybe little faster, but significantly is when playing with latest AFMF or with moar fake frames same as Nvidia. -
Amdlova Something with 125w tbp and I'am sold...Reply
Max 150w to pair with my high-end 35w cpu lol -
hannibal
$200 GPUs are dead. Pure production cost more, no matter how weak the GPU would be.Neilbob said:If we're going to be sticking with 8GB, then logically the price would be at 200 or less, yes?
Yes, I think that's definitely what will happen.
Also, all pigs will grow wings and take off for Mars, with parting thanks for all the truffles.
But maybe $320 to $340 for 8Gb and $350 to $400 for 16gb version.
non x version then below $300... $250?