AMD's RX 6600 is the most popular Red Team GPU among Steam gamers, by a whisker — but no Radeon card makes the top 30 list
RDNA 3 seems to be nowhere in sight!
AMD's Radeon RX 6600 graphics card ranks ahead of the Polaris-based RX 580 in Steam's latest hardware survey for October, by the narrowest of margins. This makes the RX 6600 the most popular GPU in Steam from Team Red for two months straight, but it still fails to mark Radeon's entry in the top 30 list. As it stands, Nvidia holds 77.37% of the dedicated GPU market with AMD stuck hard at 15% for some time now.
Currently, the RTX 3060 is the most popular GPU on Steam with a 7.46% adoption rate. It is followed by the RTX 4060 mobile and the RTX 4060 desktop, at 5.61% and 5.25% respectively. The RX 6600, in AMD's corner of the ring, is utilized by 0.98% of all Steam users now making it the most widely used graphics card from AMD on Steam. However, this is not impressive by any standard as the RX 6600 comes in at the 34th spot and is almost three years old at this point. We can spot a couple of RTX 40 (Ada Lovelace) GPUs in the top 10 from Nvidia even though this generation was more expensive than RTX 30 (Ampere) and heavily critiqued, yet the most popular RDNA 3 based GPU in this list is the RX 7900 XTX at the 54th spot.
Admittedly, Steam does not encompass the entire PC market but these statistics raise a question, why aren't gamers inclined toward RDNA 3? To be a bit more precise, why was the RX 7600 - the 6600's successor, unable to even secure a spot in this list despite dwindling RX 6600 stock? A large part of that could be attributed to the fact that gamers didn't find any meaningful merits in shifting to RDNA 3. Furthermore, used RX 6600s have flooded the secondhand market and likely most of that supply is a product of the recent GPU mining boom.
Based on our review, the RX 7600 was at best on par with the RX 6600 in terms of cost per frame. But again, the entire GPU survey is dominated by Nvidia - particularly its budget RTX 40 series. The numbers speak for themselves since statistically, gamers tend to favor Nvidia over AMD as 77.37% of users at Steam have opted for a GPU from Nvidia. Thus, it is clear that AMD needs to revise its pricing strategy as the market is in dire need of affordable but capable GPUs; eyeing the forthcoming RX 8000 series.
AMD has announced that it will launch its Radeon RX 8000 (RDNA 4) lineup of graphics cards by early 2025 - hinting towards a CES 2025 reveal. Since Team Red failed to acquire the market share it desired with this generation, the goal for RX 8000 will be high-volume mid-range GPU production which should be fruitful for budget gamers.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
Neilbob Not quite on topic, but this little bit of the current survey grabbed my attention:Reply
PROCESSOR VENDOR (LINUX)
AuthenticAMD --- 74.56%GenuineIntel --- 29.74%
PROCESSOR VENDOR (OSX)
VirtualApple --- 80.43%GenuineIntel --- 24.85%
Hrm, something here ain't quite right. What could it possibly be, I wonder? I know it can't be an issue with the survey because it is utterly perfect and above any kind of reproach. -
Saltyshackles I use my RX6600 with a Ryzen 5 7600 on Linux Mint. It's run flawlessly all games on Steam via Proton. I'll be checking to see what the RX 8600 brings to the table next year. 😎Reply -
valthuer Neilbob said:Not quite on topic, but this little bit of the current survey grabbed my attention:
PROCESSOR VENDOR (LINUX)
AuthenticAMD --- 74.56%GenuineIntel --- 29.74%
PROCESSOR VENDOR (OSX)
VirtualApple --- 80.43%GenuineIntel --- 24.85%
Hrm, something here ain't quite right. What could it possibly be, I wonder? I know it can't be an issue with the survey because it is utterly perfect and above any kind of reproach.
They are not able to publish basic numbers and add them up to 100%... Elementary school math... Valve is too lazy to fix this issue. -
usertests Sad, very sad. At least a couple of the AMD iGPUs (one of them probably being the Steam Deck at around 2%?) are doing well.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell Thus, it is clear that AMD needs to revise its pricing strategy
While completely true, they would need a significant reduction in cost and increase in performance to sway most people, the kind of thing AMD hasn't pulled since the HD 4870 and HD 5870 all those years ago. Also they'd have to have the same kind of track record with their software like nVidia to make people who were bitten by it trust them again.
And then, it wouldn't work. Consumers would win because there would be lower prices as nVidia lowers their cards to match.
The only way it WOULD work is if they could get ahead on the performance game, the way they were able to against Intel when they started floundering with process nodes, and sadly that's not going to happen either. -
Amdlova I'am very happy with the 4060 :) First all the hate, Now pure love.Reply
Don't heat, don't draw and don't make noise....
I want to try the Rx 7600 but with intel drivers amd becomes a nightmare -
pug_s I personally own a rx 6600 but it seems that there's not a lot love out there for it. Spend a few bucks more and you can get a 12gb 3060 which is faster. I understand AMD wants to get out from its high end graphics card business, but AMD should lower its prices and have more engineers make better drivers which should increase market share for its low to mid end graphics cards.Reply -
Shimaaji I honestly hope that AMD will be more able to compete with mid range GPUs. Nvidia mustn't get all the cake or prices will escalate even further.Reply
That being said: Presently AMD IMHO doesn't have a convincing package.
Highest end gaming? You want that better Ray tracing performance.
Mid range? Almost all new AAA games support both types of frame generation, but afaik Nvidia's looks much better. Even more pressing: When you're on a budget already and don't have United States power prices, but live in the EU you really can't justify AMD's power inefficiency.
Really hoping for the next generation. -
TheHerald
AMDa FG is actually good / maybe even better than nvidias. Depends on the implementation. It's dlss and rt performance that nvidia is leading over amd.Shimaaji said:I honestly hope that AMD will be more able to compete with mid range GPUs. Nvidia mustn't get all the cake or prices will escalate even further.
That being said: Presently AMD IMHO doesn't have a convincing package.
Highest end gaming? You want that better Ray tracing performance.
Mid range? Almost all new AAA games support both types of frame generation, but afaik Nvidia's looks much better. Even more pressing: When you're on a budget already and don't have United States power prices, but live in the EU you really can't justify AMD's power inefficiency.
Really hoping for the next generation. -
-Fran- A very cost effective and accessible card for most people is the best selling of a line up across generations. Shocking, I tell you. Shocking.Reply
As I've always said: the ~$300 price range is the best slot to put your best performers at. AMD should stop faffing around and make a proper successor to the 6700XT and price it under $350.
Regards.