Dell and HP disable hardware H.265 decoding on select PCs due to rising royalty costs — companies could save big on HEVC royalties, but at the expense of users
Dell and HP have begun to ship some of their PCs with disabled HEVC/H.265 hardware decoding, potentially in a bid to avoid paying royalties to patent holders, reports Ars Technica. The majority of PCs that come with disabled HEVC/H.265 hardware decoding capability are business-oriented entry-level or mainstream machines, whereas premium offerings with high-quality displays come with all the features activated.
Dell and HP confirmed to Ars Technica that a number of their laptops, including Dell's 'standard and base systems' as well as HP's EliteBook and ProBook 600 Series G11, 400 Series G11, and 200 Series G9 laptops, come with disabled support for hardware decoding of video streams encoded using the HEVC/H.265 codec. Dell emphasized that systems featuring an integrated 4K display, a standalone GPU, Dolby Vision, or Cyberlink Blu-ray software come equipped with HEVC/H.265 hardware decoding capability. Interestingly, Dell advises users to purchase 'an affordable third-party app from the Microsoft Store' to re-enable HEVC decoding.
While neither Dell nor HP explained the motives behind removing hardware decoding capability that has been around for a long time, Ars Technica believes that the companies are trying to cut down costs as HEVC/H.265 codec patent holders plan to increase their licensing fees in the short term. Indeed, to support hardware decoding of HEVC/H.265 videos on a device, device makers must pay royalties to MPEG LA ($0.2 per device, or $25 million per annum per entity), HEVC Advance (up to $1 per device, or annual license cap of $40 million), Velos Media (rumored between $1 and $2 per device), Via LA ($0.25 per unit or $25 million per entity per annum). Given that both Dell and HP sell tens of millions of PCs every year, the drop in such licensing payments translates into huge savings amounting to tens of millions of dollars per year. However, such savings also translate to greatly reduced experience for end users.
Virtually all discrete and integrated GPUs support hardware decoding of video streams encoded using the HEVC/H.265 codec, as the first GPUs featuring this capability emerged in 2015 – 2017 (starting with Kaby Lake in Intel's case). GPU developers must pay to implement HEVC hardware decode at the silicon level, so patent pools get their money directly from companies like Apple, AMD, Intel, Nvidia, or Qualcomm. However, to enable hardware decoding on the device level, OEMs must pay patent pools as well. If they do not pay royalty fees, they must disable the capability on the software (by modifying drivers) or firmware level, or by asking their GPU vendor to fuse the capability off in silicon (which is not something that is usually done).
If a capability is turned off using a modified driver, then an end-user can easily re-enable it by installing generic drivers from AMD, Intel, or Nvidia, but at the cost of losing some customizations. However, things disabled on the firmware level are hard to restore. Also, despite Dell's advice, no third-party player can re-enable hardware HEVC decoding if it is disabled in drivers or firmware. It can only add power-hungry software decoding, but this is probably something that many pre-installed programs can do by default.
As a result, it looks like users of inexpensive systems now have to prefer content encoded using AV1 or other open-source hardware codecs, or hope that their CPUs are powerful enough to decode high-resolution HEVC streams.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
DS426 Yeah, no I'll take open source codecs over proprietary ones any day. AV1 is a pretty solid alternative to HEVC. Compression efficiency is higher even if it means higher compute cost -- that's the point vs. going with H.264 or x264 anyways, right?Reply
I'm not against protecting IP with patents at all, but I can't blame Dell or HP as the value just isn't there for what HEVC provides to the average consumer and general-purpose business user. If someone is a creator or some kind of media production workflow where having it provides real value, then that cost makes sense.
Here's an idea: HP and Dell can take that money and put it back into investing more in customer support and reducing bloatware. -
dimar Just to save like $2 per device? Wouldn't that affect battery life? I'd never recommend HP anyway, but something doesn't add-up here.Reply -
erazog HEVC is quite rare to PC's, only subscription streaming services use it and those have a fall back to H.264.Reply
Almost all major free video services use H.264. -
das_stig Time to dump HEVC support and make room in hardware for open sourceReply
1. Stick with x264/x265, open source, solid and proven if a little less capable.
2. Support HEVC Kvazaar.
3. Move to AV1 but that means giving Google too much sway.
4. Develop a new open source codec for the next 25 years. -
bit_user When do the H.265 patents expire? That's what I want to know. I think the patent holders are putting on the squeeze, because they see that the technology has probably reached max penetration and are now seeking to extract as much revenue from it as possible, while they still can.Reply
Edit: Wikipedia claims there was a patent filed in 2001, but not granted until 2016. That pushes the date that H.265 becomes unencumbered back to Nov. 2030.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Video_Coding#Licensing -
bit_user Reply
Open source doesn't help. The mere fact of using an open source implementation doesn't save companies from needing to license the patents. All it means is that you potentially don't have to pay an additional fee to license an implementation.das_stig said:Time to dump HEVC support and make room in hardware for open source
1. Stick with x264/x265, open source, solid and proven if a little less capable.
2. Support HEVC Kvazaar.
You'll note that companies which redistribute these open source codec libraries in freely-available packages, such as major Linux distros, exclude support for codecs which are still patent-protected.
Using the royalty-free codecs is the only way you can avoid the legal obligation to pay royalties. AV1 is the latest and greatest, but other options include:das_stig said:3. Move to AV1 but that means giving Google too much sway.
4. Develop a new open source codec for the next 25 years.
OGG Theora
VP8 & VP9
MPEG-4 part 2 / H.263 (patents expired)
Anything even older (e.g. MPEG-2) -
ezst036 Reply
If they're only going to sell 50 computers, $2 doesn't sound like a big deal.dimar said:Just to save like $2 per device? Wouldn't that affect battery life? I'd never recommend HP anyway, but something doesn't add-up here.
They'll probably sell more than 50 computers though.
And for battery life the driver probably re-routes to another codec that's free, making the difference null. -
chemistu I just looked at Wikipedia - it shows HVEC as covered by 8738 separate patents claimed by 36 separate companies (the only reachable document listing them I could find was this hevc-att1. Fifty Seven Pages of it).Reply
This seeems insane.