Four Americans charged with smuggling Nvidia GPUs and HPE supercomputers to China face up to 200 years in prison —$3.89 million worth of gear smuggled in operation

Nvidia A100
(Image credit: Nvidia)

The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday accused a group of four individuals led by an Alabama entrepreneur of illegally shipping restricted high-performance Nvidia GPUs and HP supercomputers to China. The alleged transactions — which included buying restricted hardware from official channels and then smuggling it to China using various schemes — spanned several years and reached roughly $3.89 million in total value. The defendants now face up to 200 years in prison.

The operation was led by Brian Curtis Raymond, founder of Bitworks, a Huntsville, Alabama-based AI hardware distributor that sells products from AMD, Nvidia, PNY, and Sapphire, among others. Bitworks legally acquired restricted hardware — including Nvidia A100, H100, and H200 accelerators for AI and HPC workloads and 10 HPE supercomputers — and then sold it to Tampa, Florida-based Janford Realtor, which was controlled by Hon Ning 'Mathew' Ho, a U.S. citizen born in Hong Kong.

$3.89 million in wire transfers from China over a little more than two years is hardly a considerable sum given the context of the AI hardware market, where AI accelerators retail for $20,000 - $50,000 a unit. Last year, the DOJ began investigating Supermicro for shipments of restricted hardware to China and Russia that bypassed U.S. export controls. Just two episodes of alleged shipments to Russia through Turkey and Hong Kong were valued at $76.3 million. Given the scale of Supermicro — which earned $21.053 billion in revenue in its most recent fiscal year — the potential violations could be very significant. That probe is still ongoing.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • vanadiel007
    200 years. I think the punishment should always be in line with the crime committed.
    A murder would carry a shorter term in most cases.

    Very strange world we live in where we see violations of export restrictions being considered a higher crime level than some other very serious "real" crimes.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    vanadiel007 said:
    200 years. I think the punishment should always be in line with the crime committed.
    A murder would carry a shorter term in most cases.

    Very strange world we live in where we see violations of export restrictions being considered a higher crime level than some other very serious "real" crimes.
    It's a result of how certain crimes "scale" with the # of violation and such (linearly, it would seem), which leads to somewhat silly "upper-limits" like this.

    Though it should be stated that this is simply the legal upper-limit, and is obv not going to be the final sentence.
    Reply
  • BFG-9000
    Technically, the penalty for money-laundering conspiracy is up to 20 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $500,000 or twice the value of the laundered property, whichever is greater. So the only way the sentence could be up to 200 years for that is if they charged them with 10 separate counts.

    Treason, an overt act with the intent to betray the nation including giving "aid and comfort" to its enemies, is punishable by up to death or life imprisonment with a minimum of imprisonment for not less than 5 years and a fine of no less than $10,000.
    Reply
  • pug_s
    vanadiel007 said:
    200 years. I think the punishment should always be in line with the crime committed.
    A murder would carry a shorter term in most cases.

    Very strange world we live in where we see violations of export restrictions being considered a higher crime level than some other very serious "real" crimes.
    In the US don't sell AI GPU's while you are Chinese.
    Reply
  • coolviper777
    Such silly prosecution shenanigans. I'll never understand why they would charge someone with 10 counts of violations for 10 exported HPE supercomputers. It's one crime, where you exported 10 computers. Or, even if you do charge with 10 counts, the sentences should ALWAYS be served concurrently.

    And as others have said, this is a white collar, victimless crime. And yes, now China has these 10 supercomputers, but if you think they don't already the plans, schematics for all these things, you are naive. Murder is not a victimless crime, and yet, often the murderer get 20 years, or even less.

    And that's the real disparity. Our legal system values money and profit far above individual people. That's why you see such things.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    vanadiel007 said:
    200 years. I think the punishment should always be in line with the crime committed.
    this entirely.

    200 is stupidly overkill. this is multiple times a mass murder's jail time & most any other criminal act.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    hotaru251 said:
    this entirely.

    200 is stupidly overkill. this is multiple times a mass murder's jail time & most any other criminal act.
    And murders often face "life in prison".
    Or "multiple life" if having done this several times.

    But, the actual sentence often does not last that long.

    Just as with these people.
    "200 years" makes for a good headline. The actual sentence will likely not be that long.
    Reply