Tom's Hardware Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB delivers 15% more performance than its 4060 Ti 16GB predecessor, at a theoretically lower price and with a lot more memory bandwidth. It's a good choice, assuming you can find it at a reasonable price.
Pros
- +
Great mainstream value and performance
- +
16GB of VRAM, with GDDR7 offering more bandwidth
- +
Better to have Blackwell's features than not
Cons
- -
How much will these actually cost?
- -
Will they be readily available to purchase?
- -
MFG 'performance' exaggerations
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Introducing the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB wraps up the Blackwell RTX 50-series GPU family, more or less — along with the 5060 Ti 16GB we're reviewing today, the announced RTX 5060 series also has a 5060 Ti 8GB card, and next month will bring the vanilla RTX 5060. Blackwell RTX GPUs land at various places on our list of the best graphics cards, provided you can actually find one in stock at your favorite retailer for a not-obscene price.
Compared to the prior generation RTX 4060 Ti, Nvidia has only made some relatively minor upgrades to the core specs of the 5060 Ti. Again, there will be both 8GB and 16GB models, but where the 4060 Ti 16GB was relatively uncommon compared to the 8GB variant that arrived first, it seems things will be swapped around this time. The 5060 Ti 16GB should be the more common AIB model, with the 8GB card seemingly deemphasized.
And for good reason. In our test suite, as well as in a variety of other games, 8GB cards are getting more than a little long in the tooth. Most games are still able to run okay at 1080p with maxed out settings, and often even 1440p. 4K on the other hand proves to be too much in 11 out of the 18 games in our current test suite — and we're aware of quite a few other recent releases where 8GB would also be problematic.
We've written a lot of supplemental coverage about Nvidia's new Blackwell RTX 50-series GPUs. If you want a primer, or additional information, check out these articles:
• Blackwell architecture
• DLSS 4, MFG, and full RT testing
• Neural rendering and DLSS 4
• RTX 50-series Founders Edition cards
• RTX AI PCs and generative AI for games
• Blackwell for professionals and creators
• Blackwell benchmarking 101
Nvidia officially gives MSRPs of $379 for the 5060 Ti 8GB card, and $429 for the 5060 Ti 16GB. In our opinion, $50 for double the VRAM should be a no-brainer for most gamers. Again, that's in stark contrast to the 4060 Ti where the original price difference was $100, and the intervening two years haven't caused more recent games to become less demanding — quite the opposite.
We have a whole host of related articles for Nvidia's Blackwell GPUs, which you can check out for additional background information. The short summary for the 5060 Ti is that it follows a similar pattern to the other RTX 50-series launches. The specs are pretty similar to the prior generation, with the same TSMC 4N process node, a similar die size, and similar transistor counts.
The big changes fall under what Nvidia classifies as "neural rendering" — DLSS upscaling and frame generation (Multi Frame Generation in the case of the 50-series), and the potential for AI to be leveraged in a variety of other ways to change the gaming experience. Let's start with the usual specifications table.
Graphics Card | RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX 4060 Ti 8GB |
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | GB206 | GB206 | AD106 | AD106 |
Process Technology | TSMC 4N | TSMC 4N | TSMC 4N | TSMC 4N |
Transistors (Billion) | 21.9 | 21.9 | 22.9 | 22.9 |
Die size (mm^2) | 181 | 181 | 187.8 | 187.8 |
Streaming Multiprocessors | 36 | 36 | 34 | 34 |
GPU Shaders (ALUs) | 4608 | 4608 | 4352 | 4352 |
Tensor / AI Cores | 144 | 144 | 136 | 136 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 36 | 34 | 34 |
Boost Clock (MHz) | 2572 | 2572 | 2535 | 2535 |
VRAM Speed (Gbps) | 28 | 28 | 18 | 18 |
VRAM (GB) | 16 | 8 | 16 | 8 |
VRAM Bus Width | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
L2 Cache | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
Render Output Units | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 |
Texture Mapping Units | 144 | 144 | 136 | 136 |
TFLOPS FP32 (Boost) | 23.7 | 23.7 | 22.1 | 22.1 |
TFLOPS FP16 (FP4/FP8 TFLOPS) | 190 (759) | 190 (759) | 177 (353) | 177 (353) |
Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 448 | 288 | 288 |
TBP (watts) | 180 | 180 | 160 | 160 |
PCIe Connection | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Launch Date | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 | Jul 2023 | May 2023 |
Launch Price | $429 | $379 | $499 | $399 |
On paper, the 8GB and 16GB variants have the exact same specifications, with the exception of VRAM capacity. In practice, the additional VRAM can have a slightly negative impact on performance in situations where the GPU is at its power limit. We saw that consistently with the RTX 4060 Ti, usually to the tune of a 1–2 percent dip in performance in situations where the extra memory wasn't beneficial.
TGP (Total Graphics Power), as we've seen with the other Blackwell RTX GPUs, ends up 20W higher than the previous generation part. Factory overclocked cards — and both cards we have in for testing are overclocked models — can push power limits higher, though such tuning usually gets reserved for the higher tier card models. Combined with the slightly higher GPU core counts and clock speeds, it should allow for a larger gap between the prior gen 4060 Ti and its replacement.
One of the biggest changes with Blackwell is the support for GDDR7 memory. Nvidia used GDDR6 and GDDR6X with the Ada Lovelace GPUs, with the 4060 Ti getting vanilla GDDR6 memory running at 18 Gbps. The 5060 Ti gets GDDR7 running at 28 Gbps, giving a potential 56% increase in total memory bandwidth. In fact, the GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit interface delivers the same total bandwidth as the GDDR6 14 Gbps used on the 3060 Ti with its 256-bit interface — and the large L2 cache on Blackwell (and Ada) helps to further improve effective bandwidth.
The biggest unknown with the RTX 5060 Ti is pricing and availability. Traditionally, Nvidia (and AMD) have had more budget GPUs available at launch than mainstream cards, and more mainstream than high-end. Perhaps that has happened with Blackwell RTX, but whatever the total number of GPUs produced and sold so far, it has been woefully insufficient compared to the demand. The result has been higher prices across both new and old generation GPUs.
Nvidia's MSRPs have looked good, but outside of a few RTX 5070 cards (which are out of stock for the time being), almost nothing has actually sold at MSRP. The going rate for RTX 5070 seems to be $650~$700, over $100 more than the base MSRP, and that's the best of the recently launched GPUs. RTX 5070 Ti has been selling for $950~$1,050 (or more) since launch, $200 or more above MSRP. The RTX 5080 has been selling at $400~$500 above it's MSRP, and the RTX 5090 is basically going for twice the MSRP set by Nvidia.
AMD and Intel GPUs are doing any better. The RX 9070 is selling for $850 and more right now, $300 above its $549 MSRP. The RX 9070 XT starts at about $950, $350 above MSRP. Intel's Arc B580 has been regularly selling at $350–$400 since it launched last December, $100 or more above its supposed base price. Even the relatively ho-hum Arc B570 typically goes for $330, again $100 more than MSRP.
Naturally, Nvidia can't directly control what its AIB (add-in board) partners do in terms of prices, though in the past there have been rumored incentives and encouragements. Right now, with the data center GPUs and infrastructure accounting for 89% of Nvidia's staggering $130 billion in revenue from last year, and gaming GPUs accounting for just under 9% of the total, it's no wonder the consumer GPUs are taking a back seat in terms of wafer allocations.
A quick check around the usual places shows the previous generation RTX 4060 Ti 8GB card starting at $525, with the 16GB card starting at nearly $700. Supply of those parts has basically dried up, but it doesn't bode well for a newer, faster replacement to stay at MSRPs of $380 and $430, respectively. Time will tell where things end up, but if you're interested in picking up an RTX 5060 Ti, and you find one at anything close to MSRP (meaning, $430–$450), we'd suggest buying now and then deciding whether or not you want to keep it later.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: Introducing the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Next Page Asus GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Prime OCJarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
Amdlova I want to say that is a nice card... But with 180w TBP for those numbers it's a waste of sand.Reply
nvidia is afraid to bench the 8GB cards... Just buy an AMD card and be happy -
palladin9479 Once the 8GB model comes out would be nice to see a quick article focusing just on 4060 and 5060 8 / 16 finding the settings where 8GB stops being capable. The 1080p medium graph shows that the 8GB cards work fine at that level, but then the next step is "ultra" which usually has ridiculous texture sizes. Would be nice to see 1080, 1440, 2160 "high" or "very high", one step down from ultra and see how well those cards do. Someone buying a xx60 class card isn't going to have a good experience playing at 4K "ultra".Reply
Amdlova said:nvidia is afraid to bench the 8GB cards... Just buy an AMD card and be happy
It's right in the article just compare both versions of the 4060. Each test has a graph at the very end using 1080p medium and you can see the 8GB model does very well there. They didn't have time to do additional testing with "high" or "very high" intermediate levels and ultra has ridiculously large texture sizes that start to hurt 8GB cards. I see them as doing well on 1080/1440 with "high" settings, basically a budget gamer using whatever they can get their hands on. We laugh but I know a ton of guys like that at work, have wives and kids are upgrade a piece at a time. -
JarredWaltonGPU
In our test suite, 1080p ultra is still playable in all 18 games on an 8GB card, or at least an 8GB Nvidia card. (The RX 7600 may have some issues in one or two games.) There are however games like Indiana Jones where 8GB represent a real limit to the settings you can use. The TLDR is that it varies by game, but 1080p/1440p "high" should be fine on an 8GB card. I'd still pay the extra $50 if I were in the market for this sort of GPU (assuming it's only a $50 difference, naturally).palladin9479 said:Once the 8GB model comes out would be nice to see a quick article focusing just on 4060 and 5060 8 / 16 finding the settings where 8GB stops being capable. The 1080p medium graph shows that the 8GB cards work fine at that level, but then the next step is "ultra" which usually has ridiculous texture sizes. Would be nice to see 1080, 1440, 2160 "high" or "very high", one step down from ultra and see how well those cards do. Someone buying a xx60 class card isn't going to have a good experience playing at 4K "ultra". -
cknobman So the new gen 60 TI class card cant even come close to matching the last gen vanilla 70 class card?Reply
Seems like a really bad "upgrade" to me.
Definitely a 3 star, not 4, kind of score.
Also if you have been keeping up with the news Nvidia is purposely not letting 8gb cards get reviewed.
They told partners they are not allowed to sample those cards out for review.
The only way you will get 8gb card reviews is AFTER release and when they are purchased at retail by reviewers.
The only reason this is happening is because Nvidia knows the 8gb cards are crap. Making reviews wait until after retail availability ensures that at least the first batch will fly off shelves regardless.
Nvidia is a terrible company. -
palladin9479 JarredWaltonGPU said:In our test suite, 1080p ultra is still playable in all 18 games on an 8GB card, or at least an 8GB Nvidia card. (The RX 7600 may have some issues in one or two games.) There are however games like Indiana Jones where 8GB represent a real limit to the settings you can use. The TLDR is that it varies by game, but 1080p/1440p "high" should be fine on an 8GB card. I'd still pay the extra $50 if I were in the market for this sort of GPU (assuming it's only a $50 difference, naturally).
Yeah it's all price dependent $50 USD to go from 8 to 16 is a no brainer, but there is a large market for older stuff including used cards (see your other article). Steam survey has 1080p being 56.40% of the market with 1440p being 19.06%, that's 3/4ths of the gaming market between those two resolutions. 8GB VRAM was 35.52% with 12GB at 18.42 and 6GB at 11.93%. Over 60% of the market was 8GB or less and only ~7.2% had 16GB or more. We've obviously got a center mass of sorts around 1080/1440 with 8GB, kind of the definition of "mainstream" and why I'm interested in that bracket despite youtubers claiming that a 8GB card can't run solitaire in 2025.
It's not sexy but it's the vast majority of the consumer gaming market and with economies being what they are are prices going up, that market segment wants to squeeze as much out of it's limited disposable income as possible.
I mean RX 7600 8GB at $290 USD. Dirt cheap by todays standards. The poster child of "1080p medium/high".
https://www.amazon.com/PowerColor-Hellhound-Radeon-Gaming-Graphics/dp/B0C48LM7NN/ -
Alvar "Miles" Udell I'd say this is a 3 star card.Reply
Should have knocked a star off just because the 8gb model exists to up charge for the 16gb model.
The 19% rasterization performance improvement deserves another deduction because it is a terrible Gen over Gen increase, same across the 5000 series stack. Yes it's just a refinement generation, but even for MSRP you're talking over $400 for 1080p75/1440p60 in 2025 and not even matching last gens 4070, which will be made all the worse once custom editions tack on their upwards of $100 premiums.
Granted this is an upper entry level gaming card, a PC built around it is still very much more expensive than a console, and needs to have performance that justifies it. -
DRagor I have checked my local market. All 8Gb cards were sold out while 16Gb were still in stock, some even at MSRP (although many had price close to 5070 lol). For me it is clearly foul play by NVIDIA: let the ppl watch 16Gb version reviews and then go buy cheaper 8Gb models coe they're cheapo and ppl don't understand difference.Reply -
Gururu B580s are still in stock... So many similar cards tested from the big two, why not toss in the ARC B580 for buyer options? We know it sits in the 7600/4060 class or higher.Reply -
Roland Of Gilead
Totally agree with you. I was kinda hoping the 5060ti would have a similar bump like the 3060ti did, being faster than a 2080 Super. I kinda figured from the reviews of the new gen 50xx models that it wouldn't really hit the point. But to do so, so unspectacularly is not good.cknobman said:So the new gen 60 TI class card cant even come close to matching the last gen vanilla 70 class card?
As pointed out, the 5060ti 16gb is the only choice for only $50 more. It's a no brainer.
I'm quite happy now with my 4070 Super, and have no FOMO. Well, maybe apart from the 9070XT, which I think is hands down the award winner in the last roll out of GPU's. Defo the stand out card right now, if they are available. -
ThereAndBackAgain
Honestly, if people don't understand the difference between 8 GB VRAM and 16 GB VRAM, they shouldn't be spending $400+ on a GPU in the first place. But it's kind of hard to imagine someone knowledgeable enough to build their own PC not comprehending VRAM. The people who bought those cards most likely knew exactly what they were getting.DRagor said:I have checked my local market. All 8Gb cards were sold out while 16Gb were still in stock, some even at MSRP (although many had price close to 5070 lol). For me it is clearly foul play by NVIDIA: let the ppl watch 16Gb version reviews and then go buy cheaper 8Gb models coe they're cheapo and ppl don't understand difference.