Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 review: $549 price and performance look decent on paper

Given the recent spate of sold-out launches, there's no reason to expect the 5070 to sell at MSRP any time soon.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia RTX 5070 Founders Edition: Good if the price doesn't skyrocket

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Of the four Nvidia Blackwell RTX 50-series GPUs launched so far, the RTX 5070 is neither the most enticing nor the least enticing. Raw performance obviously favors the RTX 5090, with the 5080 a rather large step down. The 5070 Ti offers most of what the 5080 provides but with a significantly lower starting price. And then we have the RTX 5070, boldly proclaiming a $549 launch MSRP.

Sadly, graphics card prices right now are starting to feel a lot like the cryptomining heyday of 2021. We aren't seeing double or triple the MSRP, yet, but most of the new generation are selling at 30% or more above the base price, with some models priced 50% or more above MSRP. It's another harsh lesson in supply and demand economics, and right now, there just isn't enough supply to keep prices in check. As we recommended during pretty much all of 2021: Don't buy a new graphics card if you can avoid it — unless you're not particularly concerned with getting a good deal.

Looking just at performance, the RTX 5070 Founders Edition, and by extension the RTX 5070 in general, offer a decent step up from the prior generation. It's not the "nearly twice the performance" marketing that Nvidia claims, as that requires the use of MFG4X along with some seriously tinted goggles to make you believe that AI-generated frames are the same as rendered frames. But it's a solid 20% improvement baseline, ostensibly at the same price as the outgoing 4070. And in certain workloads — like with MFG or in AI tasks that can leverage the FP4 support — it can deliver sizable gains.

If you could buy the 5070 for $549 right now, that would be a good deal. The cards go on sale on March 5 (tomorrow), and we'd bet heavily they'll sell out almost instantly. And based on what we're seeing from the 5090, 5080, and 5070 Ti, not to mention all of the sold-out prior generation GPUs, we have to believe the supply will remain constrained for a long time — possibly throughout 2025, though we really hope we're wrong on that front.

With the current market conditions, how do we even score reviews like this? That's the dilemma we face. Nvidia says the price should start at $549, but we all "know" that's not going to happen. (We could be wrong; only time will tell.) Depending on the actual pricing and availability, this could end up being anything from a 3.0 star to a 4.5 star part; price is a critical factor in that. We originally considered a 4-star score, but after pondering market conditions and the lack of major advancements relative to the prior generation, we've elected to drop it to a 3.5-star score.

A 4-star score would be for the card if you can actually buy it for $549. No, you almost certainly won't be able to buy one tomorrow for that price. So how do we score something that will almost inevitably sell out? And when demand is so much higher than the expected supply, it hardly matters what we score it — it's still going to sell.

If you see RTX 5070 cards going for $899 tomorrow, that's a completely different graphics card than what we've reviewed and would rank lower, but we still have no way of knowing how prices will evolve over time. There's also the delayed 5070 Founders Edition availability, which we were notified about just a couple of hours before reviews went live (and which we didn't actually see until after the review posting). <Sigh.> At $650 or $750 or however high the prices go, it radically changes the value proposition — not that the value proposition on any GPUs is good right now.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

AI demand eclipses gaming GPU demand

The fundamental problem right now is that there's only so much silicon manufacturing capacity to go around. TSMC has the best 5nm-class and 3nm-class processes right now, and the line of companies wanting to order wafers has gotten quite large. Many of the orders are for AI hardware, including Nvidia's own Blackwell B200 GPUs, which accounted for 10X more revenue last year than the gaming GPU revenue. You don't have to be a CEO or a math genius to figure out where Nvidia's priorities lie right now.

And it's not just Nvidia. AMD has already announced prices of $549 for the RX 9070 and $599 for the RX 9070 XT, both of which will have reviews posted tomorrow. If those prices hold up — at all — we will be incredibly shocked. AIBs and retailers are likely to jack up prices in short order, probably by 25% or more.

And unlike GPU mining, where we at last got relief when Ethereum switched to proof of stake and mining it became unprofitable, AI doesn't appear to be going away any time soon. There are multiple 100,000+ AI compute clusters planned for 2025, with some even talking about a million GPUs. At something like $50,000 per B200 (possibly double that), Nvidia gets to choose between $12 billion or so in annual GPU sales for gaming, versus an order of magnitude more money from data center GPUs. Until and unless the AI bubble bursts, gaming graphics cards are likely to remain more expensive than they were in 2022–2024.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Founders Edition

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

If the RTX 5070 is available at its MSRP, it's a modest generational upgrade that we would happily recommend. That's about the best we can say or hope for. We'll discuss tomorrow how it stacks up against AMD's RX 9070 that has the same $549 MSRP. In normal times, there would be heated debates about which one is better, whether DLSS beats FSR, and if AMD or Nvidia makes better drivers. The winner this round, however, is going to be the company that produces more GPUs to sell to consumers.

We suspect AMD will be more willing to use the limited allocation of wafers from TSMC on GPUs, but it would be a major break with tradition for AMD to actually sell more consumer GPUs than Nvidia. And Nvidia would probably be willing to sacrifice enough of its potential data center profits just to stay ahead of AMD. We'll have to wait and see.

Longer term, there's a lot more manufacturing capacity that will come online in the coming year or two, and even more coming in the next five years. At some point, it's inevitable that the market gets saturated and pricing will start to come back down. That or the AI singularity hits and we all get borgified and absorbed into the machine consciousness. [Kidding! Mostly...]

Lacking a fool-proof crystal ball, we have to go by what Nvidia has listed as the official price. Maybe the RTX 5070 will actually sell for $549 at some point, with enough stock that anyone who wants one will be able to purchase a card from Amazon, Newegg, B&H, etc. If that happens, the RTX 5070 will be a good option, and while MFG is vastly overhyped in terms of what it does for performance, it's still nice to have options. We just wish there were more options for graphics cards in general right now.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Thunder64
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    logainofhades said:
    Yea it's basically a 4070s at best.
    Which, sadly, has a going price of basically $1000 or so new, or you can take your chances with eBay where prices over the past 30 days are averaging $789.55. Not that I expect the 5070 to be any better in the near term. Minor gains are the new status quo, so 20% faster for nominally the same price as the outgoing generation isn't bad.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.
    I would say the entire 30-series in late 2020 throughout 2021 was, so far, worse than what we've had from the 50-series. RTX 3080 selling for $2000–$2500? RTX 3090 going for up to $4500? Yeah. And you know what? None of that was the fault of Nvidia or AMD.

    The current supply restrictions are much more in Nvidia's control, because it's deciding to prioritize AI over consumer. But I can't fault a company for choosing to do more of the thing that accounted for 88% of its revenue last year.

    Is four stars too high? 🤷‍♂️ That's based on the theoretical MSRP, because GOK what the actual prices are going to be throughout 2025! On paper, everything looks decent. In practice, everything is fubar — and I mean that about all GPUs right now. So writing emotionally vapid comments blaming Nvidia for lack of stock just isn't something I'm going to bother doing. Yes, the supply situation sucks right now. Prices suck right now. You can't buy these at $549 right now (unless you win the lottery). But if you could buy one at that price? Sure, it's a 4-star card, maybe 3.5-star. And getting bent out of shape about a half a star difference of opinion isn't worth the effort.

    Put another way: Read the review, look at all the pretty charts, decide for yourself how good/bad/whatever the card is. But don't get hung up on one number that tries (and always fails) to encapsulate way too much information.
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    LMAO decent price!!!! And he even omitted direct comparison with the 4070 Super!!!!! Hahaha what a joke, this is the most n greed shill website in the whole world

    throwback when this same guy said 4070>6950 at same price 😂 this is comedy. Can't wait to see the 9070 "review" tomorrow where he will try and fail to make it look bad compared to this failure
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Thunder64 said:
    This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars? What a joke. Not to mention the 50 series is probably the wrost GPU launch ever.
    I get where you're coming from, and if the 9000 series had launched first, i would have some real issues with that score. But the 9000 series hasn't launched yet, the market is a mess with pricing all over the place, and the RTX 4070 Super and 7900 GRE basically no longer exist in retail. Given the space this card has launched into, if it can be had at MSRP, it's appropriate. Do I love it? No. But looking at it outside of a bubble, until there are more competing products, it's not the worst thing. It could definitely use more vram though.

    As for the worst GPU launch ever, nah, we tend to forget just how bad the GeForce FX 5000 and GTX 400 launches were. I'm tempted to throw the Radeon HD 2000 series in there, but they at least typically made it through their warranty period before they would outright die. This could not be said for the flagships from those other two series, the HD 2000 series was just hot, loud, and not very competitive. That said, is this the worst launch in 15 years? Undoubtedly.
    Reply
  • baboma
    >This thing is getting blasted everywhere else but here it is 4 stars?

    No surprise. 5070 is getting special attention because of Huang's "5070 > 4090" CES blurb that had the cognoscenti gnashing their teeth. The throng is itching for payback, and this is their chance.

    >What a joke.

    Yes, it's a joke that people are crying about overpriced GPUs, when the price of everything else had just jumped 25% overnight.

    >Not to mention the 50 series is probably the worst GPU launch ever.

    Famous last words.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    This is the first review I've read, and I'd have to say that was an unexpectedly poor result.
    Leaving out the 4070S was on purpose(probably on urging from someone who provided the hardware for testing, we can guess who), no doubt because that was what it needed to stand up to and be compared with and I knew I was not alone seeing that omitted as glaringly telling.
    I'm not sure it really matters, because there will not be any real availability of note probably until the 5070S is close to release.
    MSRP? haha, that's the real joke.
    Reply
  • DRagor
    btmedic04 said:
    Ah, more vaporware with fake frames and fake msrps. Pass
    You forgot about fake ROPs
    Reply