Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition
Nvidia provided its RTX 5090 Founders Edition for this review, the reference model that everything else needs to try to beat. It's a very different beast compared to prior top-tier models, in both packaging and form factor. Our 5090 unboxing covered this already, but let's recap.
Assuming the box we received is the same for all 5090 Founders Edition cards, it's a major change from the RTX 4090 Founders Edition. Nvidia is "going green" on the packaging, with no inks or plastics and a box made of recycled paper fibers. And yes, we get the irony of a potential 575W graphics card trying to be green. It's certainly a different look for a GPU package.
The 5090 Founders Edition card weighs 1826g, a sizeable weight loss compared to the 4090 Founders Edition that weighed 2186g. That's 360g lighter, or about 0.8 pounds. Nvidia also qualifies for its own SFF-ready guidelines, though the length and height are the same as before. The card measures 304x137x40 mm, compared to a width of 61mm on the 4090 card.
Nvidia continues to use a 16-pin power connector, but this time it's the updated and improved 12V-2x6 rather than the 12VHPWR initially used with the 40-series (and later replaced after numerous 4090 cards suffered meltdowns). Nvidia says it's confident the adapter problems have been solved, even when pulling 575W through the 16-pin connector. We'll have to wait and see if that proves correct.
One interesting change is that the provided quad-8-pin to 16-pin adapter this time has rather flexible individually sheathed cables. Combined with the angled 16-pin socket on the card and the 2-slot width, the 5090 Founders Edition should be much easier to fit into a variety of cases. Whether a mini-ITX case can handle the heat and power output is a different matter.
Nvidia's 5090 Founders Edition — and all 5090 cards — come with a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot connector, which you can tell by the "T" markings on the gold fingers. It also features DisplayPort 2.1b UHBR20 support on all three DP outputs, which allows up to 4K 480Hz or 8K 165Hz (using DSC — Display Stream Compression). There's also a single HDMI 2.1 output that can do up to 4K 240Hz / 8K 120Hz.
The 5090 FE uses liquid metal as a thermal interface material (TIM) between the GPU and the heatsink, and as such it should not be disassembled. That's one aspect of the card design that helps with keeping a dual-slot 575W part cool.
It also has a double flow through design that's enabled by using one larger PCB for the GPU and memory, which then links to a separate PCB that houses the PCIe x16 connector, and a third PCB that contains the video outputs. The radiator fins also feature an indentation that's supposed to help optimize airflow.
Two custom 115mm fans are present, the same design as the previous generation. The fans run reasonably quiet in our experience, even at higher power loads. Ventilation slots on the top and bottom of the card help to direct the exhaust away from the fan intakes to minimize the recylcing of warmed up air.
RGB lighting is present, in a relatively minimalistic form. Like the 4090 Founders Edition, the "X" shape has lighting, on both sides of the card. The GeForce logo on top of the card also lights up. By default, all the lighting is white, but it can be controlled through various software utilities.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition
Prev Page Introducing the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Next Page Nvidia RTX 5090 Test SetupJarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
Crazyy8 Quick look, raster performance seems a bit underwhelming. Weird that the RTX 5090 can be slower than the 4090(in niche cases). Wasn't going to buy the 5090 anyway, too expensive for a plebe like me. Looking forward to DLSS 4 and how amazing(or not)it'll be.Reply -
Gururu Amazing but expected as far as I am concerned. I don't think there is a lot of need to compare against anything including AMDs new cards. It was brilliant to pair with the 13900 with crazy interesting results. Will read a few more times to glean more details. (y)Reply -
valthuer Admin said:We also tested the RTX 5090 on our old 13900K test bed, with some at times interesting results. Some games still seem to run faster on Raptor Lake, though overall the 9800X3D delivers higher performance. The margins are of course quite small at 4K ultra.
For me, as a 13900K owner, that's a consolation :cool: -
Gaidax Okay, that IS a sick cooler that actually manages to do the job.Reply
I bet aftermarket 4 slot monstrocities will do better, but for 2 slots 600w that's insane. -
m3city Products like this should receive 3stars max. Great performance but at what cost? Is it the right direction that power draw increases at each iteration? Is it worth to chase max perf each time? For me it would be perfect if 5000 series stayed at same TDP as previous ones - meaning better design, better gpu - with understandably lower increase of perf compared to 4000. And then, 6000 series to have even reversed direction: higher perf with drop of TDP.Reply
And secondary, how come 500W gpu can be air cooled, but nerds on forums will claim you absolutely NEED water cooling for 125W ryzen, cause "highend"?. Yeah, i know 125W means more actual draw. -
redgarl Okay Jarred... you are shilling at this point.Reply
4.5 / 5 for a 2000$ GPU that barely get 27% more performances?
While consuming 100W more than a 4090?
And offering the same cost per frame value as a 4090 from 2 years ago?
Flagship or not, this is horrible.
Not to mention the worst uplift from an Nvidia GPU ever achieved... 27%...
https://i.ibb.co/4fks6Gt/reality.jpg -
redgarl Did you bench into an open bench or a PC case? I am asking because there is some major concerns of overheating because the CPU coolers is choked by the 575W of heat dissipation inside a closed PC Case. If you have an HSF for your CPU, then you are screwed.Reply
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a5bf4d586b20ffe0aa6281c57d419012a32cbdabd43b3e8050d2aa9a00d6cc1.png -
oofdragon 20% better at 4K and 15% better at 2K, all that having 30% more cores and etc............... got it. Oh boy the 5080 and 5070 are sure going to disappoint a lot of people.Reply
The good news is the RX 9070 will bring 4070 Ti Super performance to the table around $500 including the VRAM, ray tracing and dlss image quality. AMD will prolly counter the multi frame gen nonsense with something like the LSFG 3.0 is doing and smart buyers will finally have a good GPU to replace their 3080 or 6700 XT. -
vanadiel007 They should have given it code name sasquatch, because that's the chance you will be seeing these sell for $2,000 in the coming months.Reply
More like $3,000 and a lot of luck needed to find one in stock.
I pass on it. -
YSCCC a real space heater inside the case, and extremely expensive with not great raw performance increase... sounds like built for those with more money than brain or logic..Reply