
Chinese graphics card manufacturer Zephyr (via 孤城Hardware) has launched the Radeon RX 6500, a never-before-seen graphics card from AMD. While the Radeon RX 6500 is unlikely to beat any of the best graphics cards today, the Navi 24-powered graphics card might be a good solution for some budget gamers.
The Radeon RX 6500 graphics card is currently absent from Zephyr's website. Identifying it as part of Zephyr's lineup relies solely on the logos present on the cooling fans. This Radeon RX 6500 ITX version isn't the only offering from Zephyr, as the manufacturer has listed the Radeon RX 6500LP, which features a low-profile, single-slot design utilizing a blower-type cooling system.
Surprisingly, the Radeon RX 6500 uses the same Navi 24 (codename Beige Goby) silicon as the 2022-era Radeon RX 6500 XT. It's the same full die with 1,024 Streaming Processors (SPs), 33% more SPs than the Radeon RX 6400. Performance-wise, the Radeon RX 6500 should be faster than the RX 6400 but still lags behind the Radeon RX 6500 XT due to substantial clock speed reductions to keep the TDP below 100W.
AMD Radeon RX 6500 Specifications
Graphics Card | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon RX 6500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU | Navi 24 | Navi 24 | Navi 24 |
Streaming Processors | 1,024 | 1,024 | 768 |
Base Clock (MHz) | 2,310 | ? | 1,923 |
Game Clock (MHz) | 2,610 | ? | 2,039 |
Boost Clock (MHz) | 2,815 | ? | 2,321 |
Memory Size | 4GB | 4GB | 4GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory Speed (Gbps) | 18 | 16 | 16 |
Memory Bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | 64 bit |
Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) | 143.9 | 128 | 128 |
TDP (W) | 107 | 55 | 53 |
The clock speeds for the Radeon RX 6500 ITX version are unknown, but Zephyr listed the Radeon RX 6500LP with a 1,728 MHz base clock and 2,066 MHz boost clock. We expect the ITX SKU to feature similar clock speeds since it has the same 55W TDP as the blower SKU. As a result, the Radeon RX 6500 has a 25% lower base clock and 27% lower boost clock than the Radeon RX 6500 XT.
While the Radeon RX 6500's core specifications resemble the Radeon RX 6500 XT, the memory subsystem is from the Radeon RX 6400. It has the identical 4GB of GDDR6 memory operating at 16 Gbps across a 64-bit memory interface. The configuration results in a memory bandwidth up to 128 GB/s, 11% below the Radeon RX 6500 XT.
Mixing and matching the core and memory specifications allows Zephyr to keep the Radeon RX 6500's TDP at 55W. This is only 4% higher than the Radeon RX 6400, but a whopping 49% lower than the Radeon RX 6500 XT. The 55W TDP means the Radeon RX 6500 doesn't require any external PCIe power connectors. In addition to the dual-slot ITX design that's only 6.7 inches (171mm) long, the Radeon RX 6500 is an excellent fit for SFF builds or prebuilt upgrades.
西风显卡 RX 6500 @VideoCardz 16CU RDNA2 + 4G 64bit GDDR6 ,55W TDP pic.twitter.com/q2G9svjy5FApril 21, 2025
Zephyr compares the Radeon RX 6500 to the Radeon RX 580, a long-time favorite for budget gamers. Regarding raw performance, the Radeon RX 6500 XT is generally slower than the aging Radeon RX 580, and the Radeon RX 6500 will not change that. The Radeon RX 580 has more memory, too, which can benefit modern gamers.
However, it remains to be seen how significant the performance margin is between the Radeon RX 6500 XT and the Radeon RX 6500, since the latter is an underclocked and power limited variant of the same GPU. In its defense, the Radeon RX 6500 has more up-to-date hardware than a Radeon RX 580, thus providing access to AMD's newer gaming features. The Navi 24 graphics card also consumes less power and runs cooler than a Radeon RX 580.
At the time of writing, we haven't seen any listings for the Radeon RX 6500. But for reference, a new Radeon RX 6500 XT starts at $149, so common sense tells us that should be the ceiling for a Radeon RX 6500. It might be a bit of a surprise, but the Radeon RX 580 is still available for just $139. That's not too shabby (in terms of holding its value) for a graphics card that's been around for eight years and originally launched at $229. The going rate for a used RX 580 on eBay meanwhile is just $64.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
usertests Not sure why it wouldn't use a 70-75 Watt TDP. Maybe they have to use RX 6400 firmware or something, since it's an unofficial card?Reply
I hope we see some/any 75W, 8 GB cards this generation. -
artk2219 They've been available to OEM's for a couple of years or so, they're just being released to the general public now, im assuming its just because they have so many of them now that they may as well. If the RX 6400 and 6500 cards weren't so relatively expensive they would be worth it for budget SFF gaming applications, especially the rare 8gb versions.Reply
https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/does-anyone-know-what-the-rx-6500-is.325360/ -
Notton The one thing that totally killed any potential for Navi24 on my machine, aside from the ridiculous price, was it's lack of AV1 decode. Not only that, it doesn't feature any kind of video encode, and barely has any decoders at all, relegating most of the work to the CPU.Reply
Which would be fine if your CPU had an iGPU with video decoders already in the silicon....
but in 2022, the Ryzen 5800X3D (and AM4 without an iGPU) was a popular choice.
And if you were on AM4, but your mobo was only PCIe 3.0 capable (because why would you upgrade from a 300 series chipset unless your mobo broke?), Navi24 would become bottlenecked by it's.... take a guess...
PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes being cut down to 3.0.
And Navi24 is still is a poor choice in 2025, unless it costs $50.
Oh you want to add more monitors to your setup?
Too bad the 6500XT (the max config) only supports 2 monitors. -
derekullo As a funny comparison a Threadripper 3970X using DDR4-3200 in quad-channel has about the same memory bandwidth as this card!Reply -
usertests
I'd say it's all consequences of Navi 24 being a laptop-focused die. Hopefully AMD doesn't repeat these mistakes. I hear Navi 44 has a missing AV1 encoding feature, but not the whole thing.Notton said:The one thing that totally killed any potential for Navi24 on my machine, aside from the ridiculous price, was it's lack of AV1 decode. Not only that, it doesn't feature any kind of video encode, and barely has any decoders at all, relegating most of the work to the CPU. -
Notton Yeah, I can live with not having AV1 encode, but decode is quickly becoming ever more relevant in 2025 and beyond.Reply -
artk2219
Pretty much, why include these extra things that take up space on the die if they're already on the rest of the laptop. Why worry about more than 4x pcie 4 if you've got a direct pipe to the cpu with it. Why worry about more than 2 monitor outputs if you'll only ever be driving more than the built in lcd, and maybe one more monitor, the cpu's IGP can pickup the overhead if theres more. Why worry about missing av features if they are built into every cpu igp that this GPU will be paired with in a laptop. I get why its so gimped, but it definitely makes for a pretty sub par experience if you don't have a system thats capable of making up for its shortcomings.usertests said:I'd say it's all consequences of Navi 24 being a laptop-focused die. Hopefully AMD doesn't repeat these mistakes. I hear Navi 44 has a missing AV1 encoding feature, but not the whole thing. -
usertests
The industry has rejected AMD mobile dGPUs so thoroughly that maybe it's time for AMD to pull out of it and focus on pumping out more iGPUs (including Strix/Medusa Halo which don't require an Nvidia dGPU). Or make no compromised laptop dGPU dies ever again but offer the Navi 44 equivalent packaged for mobile if there is some demand for it. We haven't seen RDNA4 in mobile, and I don't think there are any plans to make it happen.artk2219 said:Pretty much, why include these extra things that take up space on the die if they're already on the rest of the laptop.
It's so bad that dGPU packages meant for mobile end up in Chinese eGPUs instead (like OneXGPU 2).