Lexar's latest SD 8.0 card is too fast for its own good — potentially DOA since no current devices exploit the card's 1,700 MB/s speeds
Lexar's new SD 8.0 card isn't compatible with any current devices.
The Lexar High-Performance SD 8.0 card promises read and write speeds up to 1,700 MB/s and 1,000 MB/s, respectively. According to PetaPixel, the new SD 8.0 card is ahead of its time since it is not fully compatible with any devices that use this standard, especially cameras, downgrading its performance to the UHS-I standard.
Lexar recently rolled out a series of flash storage-based cards, including the Stainless steel variant in Gold and Silver Pro, which comply with UHS-II standards. But the one that gained the attention was the SD 8.0 standard, which utilized PCIe 4.0 lanes to achieve this speed—similar to its Lexar Professional CFexpress 4.0 card. This was possible because the new standard allowed theoretical transfer speeds up to 2 GB/s.
There is a significant caveat. Only card readers or cameras that comply with the SD 8.0 standard can take advantage of the card's speed. However, none exists, as the standard was finalized a month ago. The SD 8.0 standard was designed to use multiple PCIe interfaces: PCIe Gen 4 x1, PCIe G3 x2, and PCIe Gen4 x2. While the SD card will function with currently available cameras and card readers, the performance is downgraded to a UHS-I standard at 30 MB/s transfer speeds. Hence, the whole purpose of buying a high-speed SD card is that it cannot be used effectively.
The card was designed to operate similarly to its CFexpress 4.0 counterpart, such as the Lexar Professional series, to have similar read/ write speeds that use PCIe 4.0. However, the similarity ends there, as no devices can exploit it. The SD Association introduced the new standard using the same form factor while using one PCIe lane. Lexar could have showcased the SD 8.0 card to show its performance as a concept, but having it announced as a final product is puzzling. No other storage maker showcased any SD 8.0 cards yet.
High-speed storage is essential for cameras because of the growing need for high speed and high storage for 8K RAW footage or high-resolution images with faster burst rate RAW images. This is where CF cards are preferred over SD cards. While SD cards are convenient, the pros outweigh any benefit they could offer professionals. There is also the question of whether camera manufacturers will see the importance of implementing the new SD standard sooner rather than later.
Despite the announcement, the card is not featured on Lexar's website, though its new stainless steel-based UHS-II SDXC cards are featured. We may not see SD 8.0 cards available because no cameras or card readers take advantage of this, or if they ever will. However, only time will tell if the hopes of having high-speed SD cards comparable to current CF cards will bear fruit. There's always the SDUC standard for those needing a higher-capacity SD card.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Roshan Ashraf Shaikh has been in the Indian PC hardware community since the early 2000s and has been building PCs, contributing to many Indian tech forums, & blogs. He operated Hardware BBQ for 11 years and wrote news for eTeknix & TweakTown before joining Tom's Hardware team. Besides tech, he is interested in fighting games, movies, anime, and mechanical watches.
-
Dylan Shekter A while back I tried looking up these kinds of cards and only found 1 real review. The card got to 100C during the test. No wonder they're so hard to find, they're a safety hazard. review.Reply -
Kamen Rider Blade There's a reason why SD Express is dead in the water.Reply
The SD standard was NEVER designed around PCIe.
Go back and finally implement UHS-III and stop wasting Time/Resources on trying to shove PCIe connectivity down a standard that existed long before PCIe was a glint in somebody's eye in the SD Association.
Trying to frankenstein in this spec is doing nobody any favors.
UHS-III is "Fast Enough" and focus on Storage Capacity & Cost Effectiveness. -
usertests Good luck getting even SDUC to anywhere near the number of devices as SDXC. I would like a 128 TB microSD some day. :cry:Reply -
1_rick "Hence, the whole purpose of buying a high-speed SD card is that it cannot be used effectively."Reply
This doesn't mean whatever it is you think it does.
Edit: "While SD cards are convenient, the pros outweigh any benefit they could offer professionals."
Really? You mean the *cons* out weigh the benefit(s), if any exist. -
Amdlova It's a nightmare to use a RED CAMERA on a tropical climate.Reply
IF this card hit 100c will be good at pole north.
keep your hands warm at the winter. -
jkhoward How’s it DOA? The cameras still work just fine as is. The benefit is copying it to the computer with a fast adapter. It will no longer take 30+ minutes to copy, it would just be seconds. Greatly speeding up production time.Reply -
watzupken Too fast for its own good, but also too expensive for its own good. Fast SD cards are ridiculously priced and a 512GB UHS II SD card can approach the price of a much faster 2TB NVME 2230 SSD on Amazon.Reply -
YSCCC Speed actually is adequate atm and the never ending heat is an issue to both sensor heat dissipation and parts longevity, comeon it's a small memory card, not the one you put in your PC with massive heatsinks.Reply
For shooting photos and videos I always prefer it last longer, don't burn my fingers and just get 1-2 sec more to write intot -
AkroZ SD Express 8.0 have not been finalized one month ago but May 19 2020. One month later JMicron announced the commercialization of the first card reader chip.Reply
Manufacturers are building SD 7.1 card readers because they were no SD 8.0 card on the market.
Lexaar should have made this product for a client making a device needing those specifications. It's not hard to make a usb sd-card reader, so if the commercialization is not canceled we should see them come. Some laptops can also integrate this specification. -
MilesVW That's not how it works. The minumum speed under continuous use is what people actually care about. As long as that is better (IE nearer the maximum sustained speed of the device), then I don't care at all if they advertise by the theoretical maximum transfer speed.Reply
Look at M.2 devices. You can get "PCIe 4.0" devices that range from slower than 3.0 devices. To only holds 4.0 speed for 100-200GB of transfer. And oddly you can get drives that are shocking value that will hold 2,000-3,000MB/s until full. Sometimes $50 cheaper than 'competitors' drives that perform much worse.