Motherboard VRM thermal testing – budget vs. high-end boards, does it really matter?

Budget vs. High-End motherboards
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

If you’re a PC enthusiast, chances are you’ve bought or at least looked into picking a motherboard, and it can be daunting. The list of specifications is long and includes (but is not limited to) CPU support/compatibility, port count and type (think USB, networking, etc.), storage options, audio solutions, slot count and speed, aesthetics, and last but not least, power delivery, which is critical to ensuring you get everything out of your processor.

Should you buy a board with more phases or more powerful MOSFETs? What’s good enough? Using data from our motherboard reviews, we’ll examine details such as temperature and performance to assess the magnitude of the differences and whether power delivery should be a key factor when choosing a motherboard.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • TechieTwo
    Back in the day when AMD released the FX-8xxx series CPUs, I was building PC systems with Gigabytes excellent Ultra Durable series mobos. I discovered that the VRM would overheat on these mobos with the FX-8xxx if run hard and then the CPU would be throttled. I notified Gigabyte several times and they claimed that there was no VRM overheating issues. It took them over a year of denial before they finally released an uprated mobo specifically for use with the AMD FX-8xxx CPUs. I haven't used Gigabyte mobos since.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Without real budget motherboards, like A620, this is just a validation of "adequate motherboards are adequate". None really have an issue, they just add a small and acceptable variation in temperature. No throttling in AMD, some throttling in Intel, no actual useful conclusion.

    I wanted to see 16+ core cpus on those really cheap motherboards, because they do show as compatible. I have a small server with an A320 and a Ryzen 1600, but it says it's compatible with the 5950X. What will happen if I do switch the cpu to the top AM4 one? I know it will throttle, but will it catch fire?

    This deserves a broader investigation, and an article of its own. As it is, there's no useful conclusion: mid-range is enough, top end is also good. :/
    Reply
  • wussupi83
    Good Article. Just last week I was debating spending $50 more for a 16 phase 80A board over a 14 phase 60A board. So this information is good to see and know I was okay with the cheaper board. A few months ago I swapped my mild OC'd 265k and mild OC'd 285k between a 12 phase 80A board and a 16 phase 90A board. In both cases, cooling the processor's silicon was the thermal limit, not the board's power delivery.
    Reply
  • Vanderlindemedia
    It's safe to say that VRM as a selling point really is being overrated for the last 10+ years. Like people are buying such motherboards they are not even going to tap into the max potential such VRM's have to offer.

    Budget boards even can carry, high end chips. But they will get hot, because there's no budget for proper cooling. They might throttle due to the 110 Degree limit that's usually in place. But it will still work.

    Why? AMD has set strict build recommendations - if you wanna build a AMD motherboard it needs to qualify to their standards, which makes all sense in the world. This was different with the FX era.

    FX was a wild west in regards of motherboard makers; who would place VRM's that where not capable of running the higher end models. Some boards just caught on fire once powering on the machine:

    8zTzpYjQ2MMView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zTzpYjQ2MM

    It does not make sense either to now buy a ultra-high-end-motherboard with a beefed up VRM from here to tokio - not even on LN2 you are able to reach for the maximum potential at all.

    Serverboards contain upmost 4 to 5 phases really - and they are rated for, 600W or even 24/7 usage. It tells you a lot about how consumers have no idea that a 16 phase VRM really is needed lol.

    My findings is; if you have a motherboard with certain features such as switching frequency of the VRM; you could actually dial in a higher one, and require a lower overall CPU voltage for Overclocking.

    That's one of the features i can think of and that actually helped me increase my OC with less heat.
    Reply
  • DS426
    VRM phases just became a marketing tool (selling point) -- it just becomes a paper numbers game at some point with abysmal diminishing returns at the top-end. I'm one that says buyers should go for price-point / budget first and then narrow down to the ones that have the right features and then possibly most/best features at that price-point. It also takes some research on both current trends & controversies and history of different mobo makers.

    I've seen ups-and-downs and personally experienced ups-and-downs with many over the years, usually rotating between different makers to see how their product and software has changed over time and avoid getting too locked-in to a single maker. ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, DFI... and I'll stop there, lol. I'm thinking I'll try Sapphire next go-around.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    This article is a little less involved than I really think it should be. Intel Z series and AMD X series chipset boards have all been sufficient for at least 5-6 years. It's also missing multicore testing (outside of the LGA1700) which is where power limitations will generally show up more often. A discussion about VRM architecture and what benefits can be brought would be quite useful. Also what to look out for when buying more budget boards or just smaller boards like mATX/ITX.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Vanderlindemedia said:
    Serverboards contain upmost 4 to 5 phases really - and they are rated for, 600W or even 24/7 usage.
    This is astoundingly false and one glance at any modern server board would have shown that one. They tend to have less overkill designs, but they also don't have to deal with consistent power fluctuations and processors potentially using 30%+ more power than design calls for either. Last but not least they don't have to worry about selling boards to uneducated masses.
    Vanderlindemedia said:
    It's safe to say that VRM as a selling point really is being overrated for the last 10+ years. Like people are buying such motherboards they are not even going to tap into the max potential such VRM's have to offer.
    Phases also unfortunately make for great marketing jargon whereas explaining what actually makes one VRM design better than another doesn't. While there's absolutely diminishing returns on phases dismissing VRM design is not something one should do.
    Vanderlindemedia said:
    They might throttle due to the 110 Degree limit that's usually in place. But it will still work.
    There are definitely budget boards which simply don't have sufficient VRM and are hard locked to a wattage limit. The problem comes in when AMD and Intel both don't care enough to require motherboard manufacturers to be transparent about both temperature and power limits. While I personally don't like that there are motherboards claiming CPU support they realistically cannot deliver no warnings about limitations is completely unacceptable.
    Reply