Synology requires self-branded drives for some consumer NAS systems, drops full functionality and support for third-party HDDs
Are your files going to be safer with Synology hard drives?

Synology's new Plus Series NAS systems, designed for small and medium enterprises and advanced home users, can no longer use non-Synology or non-certified hard drives and get the full feature set of their device. Instead, Synology customers will have to use the company's self-branded hard drives. While you can still use non-supported drives for storage, Hardwareluxx [machine translated] reports that you’ll lose several critical functions, including estimated hard drive health reports, volume-wide deduplication, lifespan analyses, and automatic firmware updates. The company also restricts storage pools and provides limited or zero support for third-party drives.
For reference, precious few companies make hard drives, and Synology is not one of them. As such, a self-branded hard drive is merely a drive from a major vendor, like Seagate, Toshiba, or Western Digital, that gets a new sticker slapped on it alongside a potential custom firmware that serves as a sort of DRM, unlocking the correct functionality from the host device (in this case, a NAS).
The 2024 Synology models and older are not affected by this change. Still, those upgrading to or purchasing the latest Plus Series device, set to be released this year, will have to buy their drives directly from Synology or its certified suppliers to maximize their system. Because of this, you won’t be able to pick from the best hard drives if you get Synology’s latest Plus Series NAS Systems.
The company first applied this limitation to its enterprise solutions, where reliability is of utmost priority. This practice is fairly common in enterprise settings, as huge corporations are willing to invest in expensive storage solutions that minimize downtime and ensure the security of their data. However, smaller companies would probably think twice before dropping massive amounts of cash on self-branded hard drives that have no added functionality over third-party drives, especially if they can get them for cheaper from other reputable manufacturers.
The company told ComputerBase [machine translated] that it made using Synology-branded and Synology-certified drives compulsory because of the success it saw with its high-performance NAS systems, and that users of the upcoming Plus Series models would “benefit from higher performance, increased reliability, and more efficient support.” Furthermore, Seagate, one of the bigger manufacturers in the storage industry, has recently been rocked by a fraudulent HDD scandal that affected its NAS drives. So, it’s likely that Synology wants to ensure that its customers do not get affected by uncertainties such as this.
Nevertheless, there is still a way you can circumvent this hard drive requirement. If you’re using an “unsupported” hard drive with an already existing Synology NAS system and migrate it to a new Plus model, you can continue using it without any restrictions. So, you can first set up a non-Synology hard drive in an older Synology NAS system (or ask someone with one to do it for you), and then you can “migrate” the empty drive to your new one, thus saving you some money. However, that obviously isn't an option for the overwhelming majority of the company's customers.
Get Tom's Hardware's news, analysis, and in-depth reviews delivered straight to your feed. Visit this page at Google News, and click the Follow button in the upper right.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
Notton Is this the page for Synology Plus series HDDs?Reply
https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/drives/hdd/plus-hat#features3yr warranty seems kinda low.
As long as they keep a vanilla model, sure why not a premium NAS for SOHO?
I half expect a reddit thread to popup with a list of HDDs that can run a modified firmware to trick the NAS into thinking they're genuine HDDs. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell It's not as terrible as it may seem. A Synology Plus series 12TB drive is $280 on B&H, whereas a Seagate Iron wolf is $260 ($250 currently on sale), and the Synology drive featured 1.2m hour rating and helium sealed, 20% longer rating than the Iron Wolf.Reply
I'm soon to be in the market for larger capacity Nas drives, and I'll probably splurge on the Synology models for my new Synology Nas. -
bourgeoisdude Synology started recommending their own drives a while back, and hasn't added newer drives over 16TB capacity for compatibility. I've started using QNAP as replacement.Reply -
Rando99 This is a blatant scam to increase profit margins. I've used dozens of Synology NAS devices in commercial SMB environments, with officially unsupported drives with no more failures or problems than the average MTBF. I think I average one failed drive a year over dozens of devices.Reply
As long as you're buying reliable enterprise-grade products from a reliable vendor this has never been anything more than an issue manufactured by Synology to line their own pocket.
You knew this would be coming eventually when they started doing it for their Enterprise NAS devices several years ago. Time for the market to show them just how much their sales can tank. -
LaminarFlow This past holiday season I decided to self-build my own NAS after using various commercial solutions (including Synology) for over a decade.Reply
A R5 8500G, A620 motherboard, 32GB ram (albeit non-ECC), Jonsbo N2 case, 1TB NVME cache, and all the minor stuff add up to be ~$700, almost exactly the same as an DS923+. Hell of a lot more powerful than anything Synology offers, and TrueNAS Scale works wonderful.
Slapped 4x 14TB Seagate EXOs X18 in it. $220 each directly from NewEgg, as I have been scammed by 3rd party sellers with problematic Seagate drives. Never looking back. -
HyperMatrix Alvar Miles Udell said:It's not as terrible as it may seem. A Synology Plus series 12TB drive is $280 on B&H, whereas a Seagate Iron wolf is $260 ($250 currently on sale), and the Synology drive featured 1.2m hour rating and helium sealed, 20% longer rating than the Iron Wolf.
I'm soon to be in the market for larger capacity Nas drives, and I'll probably splurge on the Synology models for my new Synology Nas.
Yeah but hard drives go on sale. I bought WD Red Pro 22TB drives for $350 a few months back on sale. They have a 2.5M hour rating.
If I had to buy synology drives I’d just dump the system and do one of those knock off synology custom computers. I’m using official hardware right now for convenience. If the cost grossly outweighs the convenience gained then it’s useless. Especially since higher CPU models are significantly more expensive than using a custom PC as a NAS. -
johnb44672 If this does indeed become the case, my 1522+ (and another 2-Bay model) will be my last Synology units -- which would be a bummer. I've even bought two Synology-branded NVMe drives for acceleration, as well as the 10Gbit add-on -- so I've given them a decent amount of money. The 10Gbit speed is a big deal for my usage, and I'm guessing that's a 'Plus'-only feature. I absolutely will NOT be locked into their HDDs though.Reply -
eza Synology can now go on my Do Not Buy list for anti-consumer practices. I'm sure they'll have fun there with HP.Reply -
snemarch
Same. I bought a 1522+ for the turn-key convenience. I added (non-Synology) ram and NVMe drives to it, and I was already a bit pissed that you can't use non-Synology NVMe for storage volume, only caching. This will definitely be my last Synology purchase – hardware lock-in should be illegal. That, or a bit of... CEO adjustment.johnb44672 said:If this does indeed become the case, my 1522+ (and another 2-Bay model) will be my last Synology units -- which would be a bummer. I've even bought two Synology-branded NVMe drives for acceleration, as well as the 10Gbit add-on -- so I've given them a decent amount of money.
Anyway, Synology should be afraid. TrueNAS is superior to their software, and it's pretty easy to set up these days. It's more work building a mini-server than just powering on a NAS appliance, though... -
Rand max I'm going to guess part of the reason I saw this article is because of all the searches I've been doing, as I'm upgrading and replacing my NAS. This has most definitely ruled out Synology, forever. It absolutely reeks of HP, and their printer scams.Reply