Futuremark's 'Vantage'
Processor Test 2: Physics
This is the last test that impacts the overall score, and it’s designed to represent the load related to physics calculations in future games. It’s another aircraft race, but with gates that are very close together, with each plane (made up of 12 body sections connected via 11 joints) colliding and giving off smoke that dissipates little by little as the environment dictates.
Since AGEIA has joined Futuremark’s paid participation program, this test is optimized for the PhysX PPU found in gaming PCs, which absolutely does not reflect the current situation - nor is it likely to change, unless some big surprises are in store. The PhysX library is used directly. Note that the physics performance of the GPU isn’t tested here (though that would have been logical since the PPU is), but it is measured via the two graphics tests.
Note first of all that this test is a little more dependent on the graphics card, with a gap of up to 7% between an HD 3870 X2 and an HD 3870. For the rest, the spread between results is similar to what it was in the first tests, though a 50% increase in frequency resulted in only a 41% increase in performance here.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
honestjohn Why should I pay good money tobe shown that my close to state of the art overpriced hardware sucks.Reply -
clay12340 Because chicks love it when you post the high numbers from your overclocked machine in forums.Reply
I think they might have underestimated how cheap a lot of the PC community is. $20 for a utility to get some arbitrary number seems a bit high to me. -
bourgeoisdude What an incredibly stupid move. In the long run futuremark will make less money because, as Florian says, popular support for this product is indispensable. Now that Tom's is shooting it down, it has already lost a significant amount of share. This product has been all about hype, and there seems to be little hype for it this time around. I'm certainly not paying for what appears to be more of the same. With two years instead of just one, and DirectX 10 instead of DirectX 9, I would have expected something better.Reply -
bpogdowz When I tried to get my results I get this fatal error: http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/6963/captureir4.pngReply -
hannibal Well this is the first and only pure DX10 title you can test on. Every other (real games) use DX9 engine with DX10 makeup. (Ofcourse, because it would be economical suisade to make only DX10 game at this moment (too few Vistas out there))Reply
So is you want to know if you graphic card is any good in DX10 environment, this is the only test you can use. What it's good for... Well not much at this moment, because it will take years untill we will see pure DX10 game engines, because the DX9 support is too important to the game makers!
But one day those DX10 games will come out, so until then this is the one and only test that you can use to test yours gpu's DX10 power...
-
caskachan duuuuuuuuuur huuuuuuuuur lets use sintetic benchamrks instead of real world game testsReply
seriously i am happy tomshardware wont be using 3dmarks newest applet anymore =D -
wingless Its amazing what some Hotfix drivers can do. 477% on a useless test is still pretty impressive. Imagine what ATI and Nvidia could do with their present day lineup if they took the time to optimize the drivers for each game. I mean REALLY optimize the drivers. Nvidia should be much better at this since they've had so long to optimize for the G80. ATI should probably spend more time optimizing than trying to get a new driver out each month. Their drivers sometimes degrade performance.Reply
As far as 3DMark Vantage goes, its useless in the real world. We should have Unreal 3 powered benchmarks since so many games actually use that game engine. -
If 3Dmark Vantage is anything like PCMark Vantage, stay away. It's the most aggravating, stupidest program I've ever used. I wasted $20 on this piece of crap. To view your results you are directed to a web site that has literaly hundreds of pop-up adds all mixed in with your results. Realy, realy stupidReply
-
thomasxstewart with fire GL v. it won't work, although most OTHER test do work, not vantage.Reply
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.