Futuremark's 'Vantage'
Overall Scores and Optimization
First let’s look at the overall scores we got.
When the same processor was used, the spreads for each graphics test, of course, remain relatively unchanged, with 71% better performance for the Radeon HD 3870 X2 compared to the HD 3870, a situation that runs counter to current results. The move from a QX6850 to an E6850 lowered the score of the 9600 GT- based platform by 9%, compared to only 4% when the frequency was set to 2 GHz instead of 3 GHz (Intel isn’t likely to be happy about those observations.).
The GPU score indeed proved to be independent of the CPU, since we went from a difference of 9% on the overall score with the different CPUs associated with the 9600 GT OC to just 0.3%. The rankings and the differences were only slightly greater than with the overall score. The performance difference between the HD 3870 X2 and the HD 3870 was 84% here.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Overall Scores and Optimization
Prev Page Feature Tests, Continued Next Page Optimizations?-
honestjohn Why should I pay good money tobe shown that my close to state of the art overpriced hardware sucks.Reply -
clay12340 Because chicks love it when you post the high numbers from your overclocked machine in forums.Reply
I think they might have underestimated how cheap a lot of the PC community is. $20 for a utility to get some arbitrary number seems a bit high to me. -
bourgeoisdude What an incredibly stupid move. In the long run futuremark will make less money because, as Florian says, popular support for this product is indispensable. Now that Tom's is shooting it down, it has already lost a significant amount of share. This product has been all about hype, and there seems to be little hype for it this time around. I'm certainly not paying for what appears to be more of the same. With two years instead of just one, and DirectX 10 instead of DirectX 9, I would have expected something better.Reply -
bpogdowz When I tried to get my results I get this fatal error: http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/6963/captureir4.pngReply -
hannibal Well this is the first and only pure DX10 title you can test on. Every other (real games) use DX9 engine with DX10 makeup. (Ofcourse, because it would be economical suisade to make only DX10 game at this moment (too few Vistas out there))Reply
So is you want to know if you graphic card is any good in DX10 environment, this is the only test you can use. What it's good for... Well not much at this moment, because it will take years untill we will see pure DX10 game engines, because the DX9 support is too important to the game makers!
But one day those DX10 games will come out, so until then this is the one and only test that you can use to test yours gpu's DX10 power...
-
caskachan duuuuuuuuuur huuuuuuuuur lets use sintetic benchamrks instead of real world game testsReply
seriously i am happy tomshardware wont be using 3dmarks newest applet anymore =D -
wingless Its amazing what some Hotfix drivers can do. 477% on a useless test is still pretty impressive. Imagine what ATI and Nvidia could do with their present day lineup if they took the time to optimize the drivers for each game. I mean REALLY optimize the drivers. Nvidia should be much better at this since they've had so long to optimize for the G80. ATI should probably spend more time optimizing than trying to get a new driver out each month. Their drivers sometimes degrade performance.Reply
As far as 3DMark Vantage goes, its useless in the real world. We should have Unreal 3 powered benchmarks since so many games actually use that game engine. -
If 3Dmark Vantage is anything like PCMark Vantage, stay away. It's the most aggravating, stupidest program I've ever used. I wasted $20 on this piece of crap. To view your results you are directed to a web site that has literaly hundreds of pop-up adds all mixed in with your results. Realy, realy stupidReply
-
thomasxstewart with fire GL v. it won't work, although most OTHER test do work, not vantage.Reply
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.