Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared
3D Power Sorted By Resolution And Anti-aliasing Settings
Here you’ll find the results of the frame rates and relative percentages, sorted by resolution and anti-aliasing settings. This makes it easier to compare the graphics cards when looking for a specific screen size or resolution.
Remember that the image quality of LCD screens appears best when run at their native resolution (for example 22 inches at 1680x1050 pixels).
1280x1024 0AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 642.6 | 137.8 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 633.9 | 136.0 |
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 625.8 | 134.2 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 600.3 | 128.8 |
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 596.8 | 128.0 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 595.1 | 127.6 |
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 590.3 | 126.6 |
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 565.6 | 121.3 |
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 564.2 | 121.0 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 564.2 | 121.0 |
Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 546.9 | 117.3 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 539.5 | 115.7 |
Palit GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 535.2 | 114.8 |
MSI GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 527.4 | 113.1 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 512.4 | 109.9 |
Asus GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 512.2 | 109.9 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 500.2 | 107.3 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 486.4 | 104.3 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 475.3 | 102.0 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 466.2 | 100.0 |
The reference 9600 GT was tested with the ForceWare 175.16 and GeForce 177.92 drivers, the HD 4870 with the Catalyst 8.6 and 8.8 drivers. The new graphics drivers contribute 2% to the results.
1280x1024 with AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 645.1 | 194.5 |
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 612.6 | 184.7 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 601.0 | 181.2 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 596.5 | 179.8 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 595.1 | 179.4 |
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 541.7 | 163.3 |
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 537.9 | 162.2 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 536.0 | 161.6 |
Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 515.9 | 155.5 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 513.2 | 154.7 |
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 505.7 | 152.5 |
Palit GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 503.5 | 151.8 |
MSI GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 492.7 | 148.5 |
Asus GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 477.5 | 144.0 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 476.6 | 143.7 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 463.1 | 139.6 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 447.4 | 134.9 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 409.6 | 123.5 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 394.9 | 119.1 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 331.7 | 100.0 |
Without anti-aliasing activated, the performance gain of the new driver versions is still roughly 2%.
1680x1050 0AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 596.5 | 148.7 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 595.8 | 148.5 |
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 587.8 | 146.5 |
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 555.0 | 138.3 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 536.8 | 133.8 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 536.5 | 133.7 |
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 534.8 | 133.3 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 523.3 | 130.4 |
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 507.3 | 126.4 |
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 488.4 | 121.7 |
Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 477.8 | 119.1 |
Palit GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 469.1 | 116.9 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 464.9 | 115.9 |
MSI GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 458.3 | 114.2 |
Asus GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 447.5 | 111.5 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 444.2 | 110.7 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 434.0 | 108.2 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 426.0 | 106.2 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 410.2 | 102.2 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 401.2 | 100.0 |
At 1680x1050 pixels, you can’t see a significant difference in the performance of the HD 4870 between the Catalyst graphics drivers 8.6 and 8.8. Nvidia’s 9600 GT gains slightly more than 2% in performance from the driver update.
1680x1050 with AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
Geforce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 565.8 | 219.3 |
Geforce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 558.3 | 216.4 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 532.9 | 206.6 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 515.9 | 200.0 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 512.7 | 198.7 |
Geforce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 466.3 | 180.7 |
Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 458.4 | 177.7 |
Geforce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 445.5 | 172.7 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 441.7 | 171.2 |
Sparkle Geforce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 424.8 | 164.7 |
Palit Geforce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 423.7 | 164.2 |
Geforce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 414.3 | 160.6 |
MSI Geforce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 408.9 | 158.5 |
Geforce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 390.0 | 151.2 |
Asus Geforce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 384.1 | 148.9 |
Geforce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 376.6 | 146.0 |
Geforce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 362.9 | 140.7 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 316.8 | 122.8 |
Geforce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 310.1 | 120.2 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 258.0 | 100.0 |
With anti-aliasing enabled, AMD performance increases by 1% when running the HD 4870 with Catalyst 8.8 instead of 8.6. The Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT speeds up by a solid 5% when the current beta driver version is installed.
1920x1200 0AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 556.8 | 166.7 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 550.4 | 164.8 |
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 545.1 | 163.2 |
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 524.5 | 157.0 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 523.1 | 156.6 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 485.4 | 145.3 |
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 476.7 | 142.7 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 469.9 | 140.7 |
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 461.5 | 138.2 |
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 439.6 | 131.6 |
Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 426.5 | 127.7 |
Palit GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 415.2 | 124.3 |
MSI GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 404.8 | 121.2 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 402.2 | 120.4 |
Asus GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 387.4 | 116.0 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 386.9 | 115.8 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 374.5 | 112.1 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 364.5 | 109.1 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 340.8 | 102.0 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 334.0 | 100.0 |
Again, the Catalyst 8.8 delivers a 2% performance boost when running the HD 4870 at 1920x1200 pixels. The Geforce 9600 GT shows a performance increase of 3.7% with the driver update.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
1920x1200 with AA | fps | Percent |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 495.2 | 250.0 |
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB) | 487.9 | 246.3 |
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB) | 477.4 | 241.0 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.6 | 467.8 | 236.1 |
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 8.8 | 465.5 | 235.0 |
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 393.7 | 198.7 |
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) | 384.0 | 193.8 |
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 378.1 | 190.9 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB) | 365.1 | 184.3 |
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB) | 339.1 | 171.2 |
Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 339.0 | 171.1 |
Palit GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 337.8 | 170.5 |
MSI GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) | 325.6 | 164.4 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 177.92 | 313.4 | 158.2 |
Asus GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB) | 306.7 | 154.8 |
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB) 175.16 | 303.4 | 153.2 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB) | 282.4 | 142.6 |
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB) | 268.4 | 135.5 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB) | 200.7 | 101.3 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB) | 198.1 | 100.0 |
With anti-aliasing, the frame rate of the HD 4870 increases by 1% when using the Catalyst 8.8 instead of 8.6. The GeForce 9600 GT gains exactly 5% more power from the current beta graphics driver.
Current page: 3D Power Sorted By Resolution And Anti-aliasing Settings
Prev Page Power Consumption, Noise Level, And Temperature Next Page Conclusion--The 8800 GT Is Less Expensive And The 8800 GTS 512 Is Faster-
JAYDEEJOHN So it beats the GTX eh? And you can find brand new nVidia drivers, but no ATI ones? And wheres the 4670? Got halfway thru, decided to skip the restReply -
jaragon13 What about the HD 4850? It costs less than the "last 8800 GTS 512's"Reply
Asus sells them for what? 170 dollars,free shipping on Newegg?
Maybe I even saw one @ 160... -
Sus-penders Why would anyone get an 8800GTS for $179 when you can buy a better performing HD 4850, for LESS money??? ATI still exists, you know...Reply -
Ryun No offense, as the article and tests run were good (I especially like the overall FPS charts), but this information would have been more pertinent, like, 6 months ago.Reply -
Niva Uh, I don't get what the people about are upset for. It's a good article, I enjoyed reading and seeing where these cards fit into the scheme of things. I know ATI has made a comeback with their recent cards but until their drivers are completely open and stable I'll stick with nVidia myself so I especially enjoyed this article. Thanks Toms!Reply -
L1qu1d Waste of 3 mins, it makes very little sense, the 9600 GTs in sli are around the 280 GTX in performance, yet it manages to get destroyed by the 4870.Reply
This article would've meant something around the time the cards came out...now I'd much rather like to see the 4850 cards compared or 260s or w.e else that is this gen. -
MooseMuffin NivaUh, I don't get what the people about are upset for. It's a good article, I enjoyed reading and seeing where these cards fit into the scheme of things. I know ATI has made a comeback with their recent cards but until their drivers are completely open and stable I'll stick with nVidia myself so I especially enjoyed this article. Thanks Toms!Reply
Exactly what is open about nvidia's drivers? -
warezme warms my heart to see the old 8800GTX included in this test list.Reply
It's amazing this ancient cards at default speed still sit in the middle of the pack and quickly rise to the top when you turn up AA and texture quality up, beating most every other card cept for 260GTX and SLI and CF rigs.
It also explains why a pair of old 8800GTX's in SLI OC'ed to at least Ultra speeds on a fast rig are still very hard to out perform by any single card (period) -
There is a reason to get the 9600GT over the 8800GT, power consumption. Look at the numbers, the 9600GT has 1/2 the number of shaders (hence a smaller die). I know the shader clock runs a little faster but a good quality stock PSU with 300W (real, like antec, corsair, etc) should be fine for running it.Reply