Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 and Ryzen 5 4500 Power Consumption and Efficiency
The Intel Alder Lake chips still suck more power than AMD's Zen 3-powered Ryzen 5000 series chips, but pairing the Intel 7 process with the hybrid architecture brings big improvements, particularly in threaded work. However, Intel's decision to dial up the power limits as it pushes for performance supremacy results in higher peak power consumption and less efficiency.
The quad-core Ryzen 3 4100 draws a stunningly-low amount of power during the heavy HandBrake and y-cruncher power measurements, but that results in the slowest performance of our test pool. However, that also results in superior overall efficiency, as we can see in the renders-per-day-per-watt metrics.
Meanwhile, the six-core Ryzen 5 4500 unsurprisingly pulls more peak power than the quad-core Ryzen 3 4100, but its faster performance results in better efficiency profile than the Core i3-12100 in some scenarios.
Here we take a slightly different look at power consumption by calculating the cumulative energy required to perform x264 and x265 HandBrake workloads, respectively. We plot this 'task energy' value in Kilojoules on the left side of the chart.
These workloads are comprised of a fixed amount of work, so we can plot the task energy against the time required to finish the job (bottom axis), thus generating a really useful power chart.
Remember that faster compute times, and lower task energy requirements, are ideal. That means processors that fall the closest to the bottom left corner of the chart are best.
Test Setup
We tested with Windows 11 on an X570 motherboard to maintain a comparable test environment with the rest of the processors in the test pool. Of course, you wouldn't pair this chip with this class of motherboard, but even lower-end 300-series motherboards should provide enough juice for full operation. We also tested with secure boot, virtualization support, and fTPM/PTT active to reflect a properly configured Windows 11 install. We have a breakdown of the test system configurations at the end of the article.
Our overclocks were rather straightforward — we enabled the auto-overclocking Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) feature with 'advanced motherboard' settings and adjusted the scalar setting to 10X. Additionally, as outlined in the table below, we matched our memory overclocks with a 1:1 FCLK/memory clock ratio to keep latency low, which games love. We tested the Ryzen 5 4500 and Ryzen 3 4100 in two different configurations each:
- Ryzen 5 4500: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, PBO Disabled, DDR4-3200
- Ryzen 5 4500 PBO: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, PBO Enabled, Scalar 10X, DDR4-3800, FCLK 1900 MHz (1:1 Ratio)
- Ryzen 3 4100: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, PBO Disabled, DDR4-3200
- Ryzen 3 4100 PBO: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, PBO Enabled, Scalar 10X, DDR4-3800, FCLK 1900 MHz (1:1 Ratio)
Intel Socket 1700 DDR4 (Z690) | Core i3-12100, Core i5-12400 |
Row 1 - Cell 0 | MSI Z690A WiFi DDR4 |
Row 2 - Cell 0 | 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 - Stock: DDR4-3200 14-14-14-36 / OC: DDR4-3800 |
AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 5 4150, 5600, 5500, 4600G, 4500, 3600, Ryzen 3 4100, 3300X |
Row 4 - Cell 0 | MSI MEG X570 Godlike |
Row 5 - Cell 0 | 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 - Stock: DDR4-3200 14-14-14-36 | OC/PBO: DDR4-3800 (5600X, 5600), DDR-4000 (5500), DDR4-4400 (5600G),Second-gen DDR4-3600 |
All Systems | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle - Gaming and ProViz applications |
Row 7 - Cell 0 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE - Application tests |
Row 8 - Cell 0 | 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus |
Row 9 - Cell 0 | Silverstone ST1100-TI |
Row 10 - Cell 0 | Open Benchtable |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | Arctic MX-4 TIM |
Row 12 - Cell 0 | Windows 11 Pro |
Cooling | Corsair H115i, Custom loop |
Overclocking note | All configurations with overclocked memory also have tuned core frequencies and/or lifted power limits. |
- MORE: How to Overclock a CPU
- MORE: How to check CPU Temperature
- MORE: Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 All We Know
- MORE: Raptor Lake All We Know
Current page: Power Consumption and Overclocking AMD Ryzen 3 4100 and Ryzen 5 4500
Prev Page Zen 2 little, Zen 2 late? Next Page Gaming Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 4100 and Ryzen 5 4500Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
Google now uses AI to write 25% of its new code — Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai underlines the company's role in the AI industry amidst strong Q3 24 financials
Chinese mineral restrictions spur Australia to scavenge waste for new sources of chipmaking materials — country turns to mining waste for rare earths
Supermicro's stock plummets 35% in one day as accounting firm resigns — storm brews after DOJ probe into manipulated finances
-
Chris Fetters All these year or more late CPU reviews recently are absolutely freaking useless Paul... 😑🤦♂️ Either do the reviews ON TIME when the CPU's ACTUALLY RELEASE or don't review them at all. 🤷♂️Reply -
geko95gek Yeah haven't these been out a while? Seems pretty pointless to even talk about them tbh, lowest AMD CPU of this generation anyone should even consider buying is the 5600. 😂Reply -
King_V No, it's not "useless" . .Reply
First, except for a brief period when only one vendor had them, going by the PCPartPicker price history, the 4500 has always been less than MSRP.
Second, for someone already on AM4, and with a low-to-mid 1st gen Ryzen CPU and having to fit a really tight budget, it's an upgrade. I know one person for whom this is the case, and the extra (at this time, extra $25) for the 5500 would actually be problematic.
The real issue is, as is correctly pointed out, is the 5000 series. The 5500 is usually available for not much more. That's what can cannibalize the sales of the 4000 series unless the price drops more, relative to the 5500.
AND.. on a final note, I really am looking forward to the update to the CPU hierarchy to see exactly where these two slot in, relative to other low-end Ryzen chips, performance-wise. -
waltc3 Pretty funny article...;) Both these CPUs came out years before Alder lake and neither was designed to "tackle Alder's Lake"...which did not exist when these originally shipped.Reply
Looking forward to your upcoming cacheless Intel Celeron CPU comparison with AMD's Zen 4 CPUs...when is that due for publication? To see what Intel has to "tackle Zen 4"...;) -
Bizla
You're going to feel like a proper fool when I tell you this was released this year (April 2022). Next time have a look at what you're commenting on.waltc3 said:Pretty funny article...;) Both these CPUs came out years before Alder lake and neither was designed to "tackle Alder's Lake"...which did not exist when these originally shipped.
Looking forward to your upcoming cacheless Intel Celeron CPU comparison with AMD's Zen 4 CPUs...when is that due for publication? To see what Intel has to "tackle Zen 4"...;) -
Bizla
If by a while you mean a few months...geko95gek said:Yeah haven't these been out a while? Seems pretty pointless to even talk about them tbh, lowest AMD CPU of this generation anyone should even consider buying is the 5600. 😂 -
Bizla
It was 5 months, not exactly years bud. Perhaps you haven't released that these released this year.Chris Fetters said:All these year or more late CPU reviews recently are absolutely freaking useless Paul... 😑🤦♂️ Either do the reviews ON TIME when the CPU's ACTUALLY RELEASE or don't review them at all. 🤷♂️