System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2010: $1000 Enthusiast PC
Benchmark Results: Synthetics
At first glance, the single GeForce GTX 470 in the current build doesn’t look bad compared to the previous system’s Radeon HD 5830 CrossFire solution. Looking a little deeper, though, we can see that the tougher 1920x1200 Extreme setting favors the dual-card CrossFire configuration by a notable margin. We’ll see if this trend continues in the actual game benchmarks.
All of the PCMark benchmarks favor this quarter's Core i5-750 platform compared to the Phenom II X3 720, even when the Phenom CPU is overclocked with four CPU cores enabled.
The Sandra-based benchmarks also suggest that the Core i5-750 is the heart of a stronger platform, although the overclocked and core-unlocked Phenom II does reach the Intel processor’s stock performance when overclocked.
Note that the memory bandwidth takes a hit on the Intel system when overclocked because the memory has to be run at a lower speed to maintain stability.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Prev Page Test System And Benchmarks Next Page Benchmark Results: Media Encoding-
sassan_88 ha ha Intel+nvidia beats amd based system!!!just like alwaysReply
and everyone is going to shoot me after this comment!! -
Wonder why the i5 vs the 1055t? I mean, the 1055t is pretty close to the i7 in multithreaded apps, and enthusiasts tend to run multithreaded programs.Reply
-
cleeve E_manWonder why the i5 vs the 1055t?Reply
This isn't really an i5 vs. 1055T article, there aren't even any 1055T performance numbers here. It's focused on the current $1000 PC vs the previous $1000 PC.
Having said that, performance between all the builds will be compared in the upcoming conclusion article, and the ~$200 price of both the i5-750 and 1055T more than justifies a comparison. I'm certainly interested in seeing how they stack up against one another.
E_man I mean, the 1055t is pretty close to the i7 in multithreaded apps, and enthusiasts tend to run multithreaded programs.
Enthusiasts run a lot of stuff, heavily threaded and sometimes only using a processor. Enthusiasts play games, too, and those rarely take advantage of more than two or three cores... -
iamtheking123 I think the question you guys are missing is: do you really need to spend $1000? As it stands you could build the June $1000 PC today for about $850 or so. And I have no doubt that a system like that would have no problem gaming a few years into the future. In terms of sheer performance, this build is better, but the June build is far more bang for the buck.Reply -
Tamz_msc Prices have dropped these days.You can add GTX 460 768 MB SLI if you look for combos and MIRs.A great build nonetheless.Why didn't you get the Antec three hundred Illusion?It comes with the front fans pre-installed for 10 bucks more.Reply -
dauthus I was hoping to see a pair of of gtx 460's in SLI, but I suppose that would have put the build slightly over budget. While I generally prefer single graphic solutions, the gf100 architecture makes me sad.Reply -
elel dauthusI was hoping to see a pair of of gtx 460's in SLI, but I suppose that would have put the build slightly over budget. While I generally prefer single graphic solutions, the gf100 architecture makes me sad.I'm guessing that these cards weren't out at the time.Reply -
Its really impressive on how intel i5 can perform and power up that gtx 470, makin it better choise than 2 ati at same money!Reply
Intel really makes difference , that´s why it been always a little more pricey i guess... -
willgart good point... what is the today price of the june 1000$ system? could you include the June 2000$ system in the comparison too?Reply
so will have a june 850$(?) vs august 1000$ vs june 1700$(?) comparison.