An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Test Configuration And Methodology
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test System
CPU
Intel Celeron 800 MHz
RAM
256 MB PC100
Hard drive
Western Digital 40 GB
CD Rom
Teac CD540E and Pioneer A105S
Graphic card
ATI Radeon 7500
Software
DirectX
8.0a
OS
Windows XP Professional
The test procedure was as follows:
NTest software used for:
Monitor calibration
Geometry evaluation
Moire evaluation
Convergence evaluation
Image stability
Readability evaluation
Color purity evaluation
Brightness and contrast evaluation
Other tests:
Display of images and color charts (reds, greens, blues and grays) to evaluate quality of color rendering and range.
Extra adjustments to display a maximum number of shades. A further evaluation of color ranges displayed.
DVD Video playback (Brotherhood of the Wolf and Saving Private Ryan) and game playing (Quake III and Aquanox) to test quality in an entertainment environment.
Test and examination of options provided by the OSD.
NTest was used in several resolutions (1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200) at 85 Hz to see how the monitors reacted to changes, and to make sure and not give undue advantage to electronics optimized for a specific resolution.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
I just took a Hitachi CM721F into daily use alongside Hitachi CM771, the shadow mask CRT does offer good color rendition without visible support wires of Trinitron-type solution.
iiyama Vision Master Pro 514 22" CRT .24 Bought back in 2004 (wow time flys) and still looking at it as i type. What a excellent monitor (still). I think around $500 bucks in 04. I had a different iiyama model 5 years before that. So the crt's where made of great quality that lasted--but i don't think the lcd that they make are near the quality of the past. :(