Crucial P3 Plus SSD Review: Capacity on the Cheap

The P3 Plus is a good first effort at a faster budget SSD with Crucial’s new QLC.

Crucial P3 Plus SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Crucial P3 Plus enters a crowded market for budget PCIe 4.0 drives, managing to stand out by offering higher capacities. This is an efficient, capable drive but not without its caveats.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    High-capacity options

  • +

    Good value

  • +

    5-year warranty and software support

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    QLC still has its drawbacks

  • -

    Middling performance

  • -

    Lower endurance than competitors

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Crucial P3 Plus is the first drive we’ve tested with Phison’s E21T controller and Micron’s new 176-layer QLC flash. Starting at just $54 for the 500GB capacity or $94 for 1TB, it’s poised to be an inexpensive PCIe 4.0 option across a spectrum of available capacities for PC use. Unlike many of the other SSDs at this price-performance point, the P3 Plus offers up to 4TB of storage. And despite its budget price, the drive offers compelling performance while still being quite efficient. It also has a full-fledged five-year warranty and Crucial’s software support.

The budget PCIe 4.0 SSD space has been heating up for some time with several excellent drives in the mix such as the HP FX900, the Silicon Power UD90, and the WD SN770. The P3 Plus stands apart by using QLC NAND, which allows for higher capacities and a lower cost per GB, but slightly lesser performance than the best SSDs on the market. 

Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • cyrusfox
    This is impressive, is anyone else achieving QLC on charge trap NAND yet? 220 cycles is respectable for a first attempt.
    As far as I know this is the first charge trap QLC ssd on the market. Microns old QLC drives and NAND(Which they sell to Rocket and others) were all based on Floating Gate NAND they co-developed with Intel now Solidigm which Hynix bought from Intel (Solidigm , lame name). Micron's old QLC SSD drive was essentially identical to Intel's 660p or 665p(Identical NAND, different controller tuning). Solidgm is the only NAND manufacturer still utilizing charge trap storage which appears to have an inherrent advantage at multiple charge states per cell compared to charge trap which the other NAND makers are utilizing (Samsung, Hynix, Micron). This is supported by Solidigm being the first to show off PLC tech based on floating gate. With charge trap successfully making it to market with QLC it's still in the race for adding addition bits per cell but likely 2-3 years behind (based on the first qlc drive which came out 2019 - Intel 660p).
    Reply
  • cknobman
    IMO the cost savings is not worth the tradeoff of reduced performance and endurance.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    cknobman said:
    IMO the cost savings is not worth the tradeoff of reduced performance and endurance.

    The reduced performance doesn't bother me, the price of these SSDs is very attractive.

    However, the reduced endurance guarantees does have me a little worried.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Nay, its too expensive. No doubt its PCIE 4.0 but $189 for 2TB? ITs too expensive.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Albert.Thomas said:
    The reduced performance doesn't bother me, the price of these SSDs is very attractive.

    However, the reduced endurance guarantees does have me a little worried.

    200TBW is still decent because most end users do not overwrite their drives that many times (if you do, you need a bigger drive).

    But the cost $189 for 2TB. You can find many TLC drives at that price range too.
    Reply
  • jackt
    random write is as good as skhynks p41 ! but random read is slow !
    Reply
  • escksu
    jackt said:
    random write is as good as skhynks p41 ! but random read is slow !

    The write is good because of the huge SLC cache. But you need a big drive to have a big cache
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    jackt said:
    random write is as good as skhynks p41 ! but random read is slow !

    I've tested this drive myself, the write performance of the P3 Plus is incredible.

    The read performance is reflective of it's budget price, however.
    Reply