Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Advanced Transient Response Tests
For details about our transient response testing, please click here.
In the real world, power supplies are always working with loads that change. It's of immense importance, then, for the PSU to keep its rails within the ATX specification's defined ranges. The smaller the deviations, the more stable your PC will be with less stress applied to its components.
We should note that the ATX spec requires capacitive loading during the transient rests, but in our methodology, we also choose to apply a worst case scenario with no additional capacitance on the rails.
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 20ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.992V | 11.557V | 3.62% | Pass |
5V | 5.148V | 5.037V | 2.16% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.394V | 3.227V | 4.93% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.034V | 4.975V | 1.17% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 10ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.993V | 11.440V | 4.61% | Pass |
5V | 5.148V | 5.023V | 2.44% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.394V | 3.231V | 4.81% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.034V | 4.962V | 1.43% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 1ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.992V | 11.574V | 3.49% | Pass |
5V | 5.148V | 5.007V | 2.74% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.394V | 3.226V | 4.95% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.034V | 4.974V | 1.19% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 20ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.978V | 11.806V | 1.43% | Pass |
5V | 5.127V | 5.017V | 2.14% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.369V | 3.196V | 5.14% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.020V | 4.958V | 1.24% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 10ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.978V | 11.792V | 1.55% | Pass |
5V | 5.126V | 4.997V | 2.51% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.369V | 3.200V | 5.00% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.020V | 4.945V | 1.50% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 1ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 11.978V | 11.760V | 1.82% | Pass |
5V | 5.126V | 5.034V | 1.79% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.368V | 3.212V | 4.63% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.020V | 4.950V | 1.39% | Pass |
Transient response is mediocre at 12V and 3.3V. The latter rail is saved from failing in these tests because of its high nominal voltage.
Turn-On Transient Tests
In the next set of tests, we measure the PSU's response in simpler transient load scenarios—during its power-on phase. Ideally, we don't want to see any voltage overshoots or spikes since those put a lot of stress on the DC-DC converters of installed components.
The voltage dip in the last test, "PSU Off to Full 12V" can create problems with some mainboards.
Power Supply Timing Tests
There are several signals generated by the power supply, which need to be within specified, by the ATX spec, ranges. If they are not, there can be compatibility issues with other system parts, especially mainboards. From year 2020, the PSU's Power-on time (T1) has to be lower than 150ms and the PWR_OK delay (T3) from 100 to 150ms, to be compatible with the Alternative Sleep Mode.
T1 (Power-on time) & T3 (PWR_OK delay) | ||
---|---|---|
Load | T1 | T3 |
20% | 80ms | 264ms |
100% | 78ms | 266ms |
PSU Timing Charts
The PWR_OK delay is out of the 100-150ms region, so the PSU does not support the alternative sleep mode recommended by the ATX spec.
Ripple Measurements
Ripple represents the AC fluctuations (periodic) and noise (random) found in the PSU's DC rails. This phenomenon significantly decreases the capacitors' lifespan because it causes them to run hotter. A 10-degree Celsius increase can cut into a cap's useful life by 50%. Ripple also plays an important role in overall system stability, especially when overclocking is involved.
The ripple limits, according to the ATX specification, are 120mV (+12V) and 50mV (5V, 3.3V, and 5VSB).
Test | 12V | 5V | 3.3V | 5VSB | Pass/Fail |
10% Load | 49.2 mV | 14.4 mV | 16.1 mV | 18.1 mV | Pass |
20% Load | 27.4 mV | 17.9 mV | 16.5 mV | 17.8 mV | Pass |
30% Load | 16.8 mV | 13.8 mV | 17.2 mV | 19.0 mV | Pass |
40% Load | 17.5 mV | 14.6 mV | 16.4 mV | 21.7 mV | Pass |
50% Load | 16.0 mV | 16.9 mV | 17.2 mV | 20.1 mV | Pass |
60% Load | 19.2 mV | 17.5 mV | 18.3 mV | 20.5 mV | Pass |
70% Load | 19.3 mV | 18.8 mV | 19.4 mV | 22.6 mV | Pass |
80% Load | 20.4 mV | 21.5 mV | 21.1 mV | 26.0 mV | Pass |
90% Load | 21.0 mV | 18.4 mV | 20.9 mV | 23.9 mV | Pass |
100% Load | 29.1 mV | 22.8 mV | 24.6 mV | 25.0 mV | Pass |
110% Load | 31.9 mV | 32.4 mV | 26.9 mV | 25.5 mV | Pass |
Crossload 1 | 41.9 mV | 19.4 mV | 25.0 mV | 22.6 mV | Pass |
Crossload 2 | 39.9 mV | 16.7 mV | 33.8 mV | 21.2 mV | Pass |
Crossload 3 | 45.8 mV | 15.5 mV | 22.5 mV | 22.9 mV | Pass |
Crossload 4 | 28.5 mV | 19.0 mV | 17.5 mV | 25.7 mV | Pass |
Ripple suppression is satisfactory.
Ripple At Full Load
Ripple At 110% Load
Ripple At Cross-Load 1
Ripple At Cross-Load 4
EMC Pre-Compliance Testing – Average & Quasi-Peak EMI Detector Results
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) is the ability of a device to operate properly in its environment without disrupting the proper operation of other nearby devices.
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) stands for the electromagnetic energy a device emits, and it can cause problems in other nearby devices if too high. For example, it can be the cause of increased static noise in your headphones or/and speakers.
There are several EMI spikes, with both the AVG and Peak EMI detectors. The spikes are fewer with the latter detector.
MORE: Best Power Supplies
MORE: How We Test Power Supplies
MORE: All Power Supply Content
Current page: Transient Response Tests, Timing Tests, Ripple Measurements and EMC Pre-Compliance Testing
Prev Page Protection Features, DC Power Sequencing, Cross-Load Tests and Infrared Images Next Page Performance, Noise, Efficiency and Power FactorAris Mpitziopoulos is a contributing editor at Tom's Hardware, covering PSUs.
30-year-old Pentium FDIV bug tracked down in the silicon — Ken Shirriff takes the microscope to Intel's first-ever recall
Cyberpunk 2077 update 2.2 claims to improve Arrow Lake performance by up to 33%, theoretically matching the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Empyrean Technology gives control to CEC after U.S. blacklisting — China’s top developer of chip design systems hands reins to state-owned firm
-
helper800 The title should have been; Gigabyte PSU Review: Lacking any Explosive Features, Good or Bad.Reply -
watzupken I don't know man. Once beaten, twice shy. Even with the fixes, this is not a PSU that I will use or recommend. To me, the worst part is how Gigabyte tried to shrug off responsibility for the explosive PSU that are potential fire hazard, and put off fixing the shortcomings of the PSU for almost a year.Reply -
NightHawkRMX
The explosive p-gm is discontinued. It has been replaced by the UD series which are "fixed" allegedly.Pc amature said:How do I know difference between new model and old model