Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC Review: Taming the Beast

A large cooler for a powerful GPU

Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Gigabyte’s packaging includes the card and a support bracket, aka “anti-sag bracket,” should you want something to prop up the end of the card that’s opposite the video ports. It’s a bit more involved getting the support stand assembled and connected to the back of the card, but it does have the benefit of screwing into the card so that it won’t slide around if you happen to move your PC on occasion.

Beyond that, you get the standard (at least in our experience) 4x 8-pin to 16-pin ‘quadropus’ adapter. It’s been in the news a lot with regards to melting connectors, but as of this writing Nvidia hasn’t released any official statement on the matter other than that it’s “investigating” the situation. The adapter that came with our Gigabyte sample does use AWG14 wires rated for 300V and appears identical to the other adapters we’ve received with RTX 4090 cards.

Gigabyte’s card is physically slightly larger than the RTX 4090 Founders Edition, measuring 340 x 143 x 74mm (our measurements). It’s a 3.5-slot design, though the IO bracket is only two slots wide — which makes the included support bracket potentially more useful. This isn’t the biggest RTX 4090 we’ve tested so far — that honor goes to the Asus ROG Strix — but this is still a very large graphics card.

At the same time, Gigabyte’s card also happens to be the lightest of the four RTX 4090 models we’ve looked at so far (at least if you include the weight of the MSI card’s radiator and fans) weighing 1990g (4.38 pounds). So 2kg is the “lightest” 4090 card? Yes, and you can thank the 450W TBP and the affiliated cooling for that. But if you’d prefer something a bit larger, by all means, go check out the Gigabyte RTX 4090 Aorus Master.

The Gigabyte fans lack the integrated rim that’s become common on higher-end graphics cards in the past couple of years, though its fans are quite large at 105mm in diameter. Airflow and cooling prove sufficient, with the Gigabyte card seeming to favor slightly higher fan speeds and lower temperatures.

Below each of the fans sits a plastic diffuser ring for the RGB lighting. The default lighting mode, at least on our sample, appears to be a strobe rainbow effect that’s quite distracting. The RGB lights also turn off when the fans aren’t spinning. We’re not certain that this is supposed to be the default lighting mode (it seems to be based on the Gigabyte images we’ve seen), but you’ll need to download and install Gigabyte’s RGB Fusion software or Control Center to change it. Do that before you install the card if you want to save yourself a potential headache.

As we’ve said, Gigabyte’s card doesn’t break any of the traditional rules. It’s larger than some cards, but all the basic features are par for the course. That goes for the video connectivity as well, which uses the standard three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and a single HDMI 2.1 port. Power as usual also comes via a 16-pin 12VHPWR connector, the current root of all evils for Nvidia’s RTX 4090 cards.

Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC Teardown

Disassembly of the Gigabyte 4090 Gaming proves about as easy as you’re likely to find for a high-end graphics card. There are ten Philips screws — six for the backplate and four for the main GPU area — securing the heatsink to the PCB. Remove those and apply a bit of pressure and you can pop the cooler off.

There are three cables for fans and lighting that connect the cooler and shroud to the PCB. Disconnect those and you can fully separate the cooler from the PCB and backplate. If you want to get at the other side of the PCB, there are five more Philips screws plus another six Philips screws that secure the IO bracket. All of these need to be removed before you can pry the PCB from the metal backplate, which sticks to the board via four more thermal pads.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Like all the other 4090 cards we’ve looked at, Gigabyte uses plenty of power phases — 20 for the GPU and four more for the GDDR6X. You can also see the four “missing” power phases that are only used on Gigabyte’s higher-end cards, the Aorus Master and the Aorus Xtreme Waterforce.

The GDDR6X memory has the same "Micron DB8ZC" label as we’ve seen on other 4090 cards. Our overclocking (below) indicates that these are definitely 21 Gbps chips, while we’ve tested two other 4090 cards that appear to have 24 Gbps memory labeled as 21 Gbps.

Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC Manual Overclocking

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

This is the fourth RTX 4090 card we’ve tested and reviewed, all of which seem to hit similar limits on the GPU core clocks, at least without the ability to directly modify the voltage.

We started by maxing out the power limit at 133% — Gigabyte has a wider range than we’ve seen on some of the other cards, presumably due to its lower default clock. Then we set the GPU clock to +200 MHz and ran some tests. It was almost stable but crashed after a few minutes, so we dropped the overclock to +180 MHz — which is where all of the other cards have landed as well.

Next, we set the memory to +1000 MHz and restarted stress testing. That seemed to run without issue so we bumped it up another 250 MHz and were still able to keep running our stress test (Metro Exodus Enhanced, at extreme settings). That appeared stable as well so we tried for +1500 MHz… and immediately crashed. Extended testing at 1250 also proved unstable in a few games, so we backed off to a final +1150 MHz on the memory (23.3 Gbps effective speed).

As you might expect, the large increase in power limit meant that under load, we saw much higher power draw. Given the melting 16-pin adapter problems others have experienced, we would not recommend manual overclocking on RTX 4090 cards. In fact, you might want to go the opposite direction and power limit the cards to 70%–80%, which will still generally give you over 90% of the base performance and might just be enough to keep your adapter from melting. No guarantees, naturally, but it will also boost power efficiency. Check our RTX 4090 Founders Edition efficiency testing for further details. 

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • cknobman
    Between pricing, power, things melting I want nothing to do with this gen of Nvidia cards.

    I'll wait to see what AMD has and if they suck too then I will just wait for next gen or pricing to drop like a rock.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    cknobman said:
    Between pricing, power, things melting I want nothing to do with this gen of Nvidia cards.

    I'll wait to see what AMD has and if they suck too then I will just wait for next gen or pricing to drop like a rock.

    Have to agree with you! This chase for max performance is not something I'm interested in. Same with current gen CPU's. Too much power draw.

    It's almost cyclical. A good few years ago, power requirements went up dramatically for both GPU's and CPU's, and then dialled back a little with more efficient designs. Seems like we're here again. Hopefully the next gen or two will dial back power consumption to more reasonable levels, while maintaining a decent leap in performance over the previous gen. Specially where we are right now in a global sense, cost of living, utilities, and an ever-worsening climate situation. Electricity/Gas costs a bomb here in Europe. These GPU's just don't make sense for most people.
    Reply
  • RodroX
    @JarredWaltonGPU with the melting adapter and native cables issues, you Sir are a very brave man to go ahead and OC one of this beasts!
    Reply
  • mrv_co
    I guess I'm glad these cards exist and continue to push the performance envelope, but I just never made the mental leap to need or want a 'flagship' GPU (much less an even larger case and even more power hungry power supply)... especially since, having had full-tower and mid-tower cases over the years, I transitioned to a SFF case that is cool, quiet and fits neatly under my desk, while realizing that I'm perfectly happy with my ultra wide QHD display.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    RodroX said:
    @JarredWaltonGPU with the melting adapter and native cables issues, you Sir are a very brave man to go ahead and OC one of this beasts!
    What's the worst that can happen? It's not like I leave the PC running and walk away for hours. If it melts, that would be sort of awesome and I could do an article on how I caused a 4090 to melt! LOL

    I still suspect there's a better than reasonable chance Jonny Guru is right and that a few people didn't properly insert the connector. There's a lot of current running through there. Manufacturing defects are the only other real possibility. Given we never heard of people melting RTX 3090 or 3090 Ti 12-pin connections, and that the extra four sense pins make it a bit more difficult to fully insert the 16-pin connector, that seems the most likely option.

    But until we have some official statement of cause and cure, it really muddies the RTX 40-series waters!
    Reply
  • junglist724
    mrv_co said:
    I guess I'm glad these cards exist and continue to push the performance envelope, but I just never made the mental leap to need or want a 'flagship' GPU (much less an even larger case and even more power hungry power supply)... especially since, having had full-tower and mid-tower cases over the years, I transitioned to a SFF case that is cool, quiet and fits neatly under my desk, while realizing that I'm perfectly happy with my ultra wide QHD display.
    I've been sticking flagship CPUs and GPUs into SFF cases for a couple generations now. The 4090FE still fits into some SFF cases and should work well in ones that take good advantage of flow through coolers. The C4-SFX(if it ever actually releases) looks like it would work well even in an air cooled build with a 7950X/13900K + 4090FE. Use an SX1000 PSU plus a 90 or 180 degree 12VHPWR adapter and powering it should be fine.
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    Trying hard ... not ... to be ... grumpy old ... misery guts ... ack ...

    Subjective: Quantity and/or quality of RGB a matter of total irrelevance to some people.

    Pained gasping for breath
    (Has no intention of ever letting one of these near the electricity bills. Not sure why the need was felt to comment at all).
    Reply