Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
GPU And Gaming Performance
Mobile GPU performance is becoming increasingly important as people begin to see their phones and tablets as portable gaming machines. This section explores GPU performance with several synthetic and real-world game engine tests. To learn more about how these benchmarks work, what versions we use, or our testing methodology, please read our article about how we test mobile device GPU performance.
The Adreno 420 GPU in both the Galaxy Note 4 and Nexus 6 perform well in this OpenGL ES 2.0 benchmark. Not surprisingly, it pulls ahead of the Snapdragon 801 based phones (Adreno 330 GPU and only 14.9GB/s memory bandwidth) in the Graphics category by 25% to 45% depending on the device. The bulk of this advantage is due to improvements in pixel shading and texturing.
It’s a bit more surprising to see the Note 4 top the Graphics score of the Mali T760MP8 in the Galaxy S6. Both devices perform about the same when focusing primarily on geometry setup. The Note 4 gains its advantage when doing pixel shading and texturing operations.
At the medium quality setting, Basemark X shows a similar 20% to 25% performance delta between the Note 4 and the Snapdragon 801 based phones (The LG G3 is an outlier, with lower than average graphics performance.) The Note 4 can't keep pace with the GS6, falling behind the newer phone by 28%.
At the higher quality setting, the two Snapdragon 805 devices pull ahead of the iPhone 6 Plus, otherwise the results remain the same.
GFXBench Manhattan is an OpenGL ES 3.0 based benchmark that puts an emphasis on pixel shaders. This was one of the things Qualcomm focused on when developing the Adreno 420 and it shows: The Note 4 scores ~60% higher than Adreno 330 equipped phones.
While the Note 4 is competitive with the GS6 in 3DMark: Ice Storm Unlimited, even outpacing the newer phone in pixel shading duties, it falls behind in this more demanding test by 31%. Perhaps the synthetic tests will provide an answer.
The Note 4 experiences some thermal throttling in T-Rex, which is why it falls behind the Nexus 6. Once again, the Snapdragon 805 shows a 25% to 30% advantage over the previous generation 801 (disregarding the G3).
The synthetic tests don't show any particular weak points for the Note 4, its extra memory bandwidth put to good use in the Alpha Blending and Fill tests.
It's curious to see the Galaxy S6 outperform the Note 4 in both Manhattan and T-Rex, but fall so far behind in the synthetic tests. Monitoring clock frequencies shows that the S6 hits its max GPU frequency of 772MHz in Manhattan as expected; however, it only ramps to 700MHz in the synthetic tests and 3DMark. A 10% deficit in clock speed can account for some of the deficit, but not all. Seeing the low scores in Alpha Blending and Fill, I thought the memory bus may not be reaching its max frequency. According to the GPU frequency table, however, the memory bus runs at max frequency as long as the GPU is clocked at 600MHz or above. There's no obvious explanation for this discrepancy.
The Adreno 420 in the Note 4 is not the top dog in the GPU race anymore, but still offers excellent performance running modern games. Rendering enough pixels to fill the QHD display with a complex 3D scene is still too much for the Adreno 420. Fortunately, most games render at reduced resolutions offscreen so this should not be an issue in most cases.
Where this limitation does come into play is when using the Samsung Gear VR. With your eyes so close to the screen, even a QHD resolution on an AMOLED panel is not enough to mask individual pixels. The need for higher resolution panels for VR/AR applications will continue to push GPU development. Until GPUs catch up, the complexity of VR content will be limited.
