USB 3.0 is set to become the de facto standard for performance-oriented portable devices. We take a look at four enclosures that bring modern performance to pocket-sized storage. If you have an old laptop drive laying around, throw it in one of these.
Test Settings
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test-System Configuration
CPU
Intel Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz, 8MB Shared L3 Cache)
CPU Cooler
Rosewill FORT120
Motherboard
Gigabyte X58A-UD7, BIOS F6 (03-11-2010)
RAM
Kingston KHX16000D3ULT1K3/6GX (6GB) DDR3-2000 at DDR3-1600 CAS 7-7-7-20
Graphics
Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1GB 725 MHz GPU, GDDR5-4000
OS Hard Drive
Western Digital Velociraptor WD3000HLFS, 300GB 10,000 RPM, SATA 3 Gb/s, 16MB cache
Test Drive
Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB SATA 6 Gb/s
USB 3.0 Host
Integrated NEC D720200F1, PCIe 2.0 (x1)
Sound
Integrated HD Audio
Network
Integrated Gigabit Networking
Power
Corsair CMPSU-850HX 850W Modular ATX12V v2.2, EPS12V, 80 PLUS Gold
Software
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Graphics
AMD Catalyst 10.3
Chipset
Intel INF 9.1.1.1020
Benchmarks
h2benchw 3.13
Sequential and Sustained Reads and Writes (KB/s) Interface Bandwidth (MB/s) and Access Times (ms)
We wanted the most direct PCIe 2.0 connection to the chipset possible, and got it using an X58 motherboard from Gigabyte. The X58A-UD7 graced our recent high-end System Builder Marathon PC and a full review of the board is forthcoming.
TomD_1So basically, they all have identical hardware, and IMO all look ugly
You forgot to mention they all fit in a shirt pocket. That is the most important part.
What's the performance like if you use it with a hard drive? Just same as usb 2.0 I'd imagine? Odd that they're only hitting 35MB/sec with USB 2.0. It should go 60MB/sec. Why is this only half the speed?