NATO believes Russia poses a threat to the West’s internet and GPS services
If they're destroyed, there's no solid backup plan for oceanic fiber optic networks.
According to NATO intelligence officials, some of the services we take for granted in our daily lives could be easily disrupted if Russia chose to do so. Analysts believe Russia already has plans in place and is developing further strategies to disrupt Internet and Global Positioning System (GPS) networks worldwide.
Analysts believe Russia is mapping the undersea fiber optic cables that transfer data between continents. Officials speculate that the nation may have already carried out attacks on telecommunications and GPS networks on a smaller scale. NATO thinks Russia may have plans in place to target those networks in retribution for the West’s support for Ukraine in its war against Russia.
The deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, laid bare the warning in June. Following an attack on Nord Stream 2, a gas pipeline between Russia and Germany, Medvedev issued a warning to NATO and other Western countries. Believing the West was behind the attack that blew up the pipeline, Medvedev said nothing was holding Russia back from “destroying the ocean floor cable communications of our enemies.”
In 2023, damage to a cable running under the Baltic Sea disrupted telecommunications between Sweden and Estonia. Russia strongly denied any involvement, but Sweden’s civil defense minister said the damage resulted from “external force or tampering.”
More recently, Russia was accused of an attack on GPS navigation systems that grounded flights from Helsinki, Finland, to Tartu, Estonia, for a month in April. Melanie Garson, an international security expert at University College London, told Business Insider that Russia has been developing this “cheap and effective way of malicious gray-zone interference” without resulting in open warfare for quite some time.
In a world increasingly dependent on the internet, data flows between continents are reliant on undersea telecommunications cables. A network of fiber optic cables spanning around 745,000 miles transmits 95% of international data. These cables have been viewed as potential military targets for decades, and both the U.S. and the former USSR kept watch over them during the Cold War.
Since Russia has land-based internet connectivity to Europe and Central Asia, it is much less reliant on undersea cables than the rest of the world. It makes recent Russian naval and intelligence activities worrisome. According to a Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report, Russia’s spy ships and submarines have been loitering near the undersea cable routes.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
In response, NATO countries are stepping up their surveillance and patrols in vulnerable areas. NATO itself stepped up aircraft patrols off the coast of Ireland amid concerns about Russian submarine activity there. The organization is also establishing a system to automatically warn of attempted interference with oceanic fiber optic cables and reroute communications via satellite.
Unfortunately, the West doesn’t have any backup systems for the undersea fiber optic cable network, or the GPS systems aviation relies upon. The CSIS has called on the U.S. to increase its international cooperation to better coordinate a response to potential attacks on these key areas of infrastructure and for the rest of the world to work on developing robust alternatives for international communications systems.
Jeff Butts has been covering tech news for more than a decade, and his IT experience predates the internet. Yes, he remembers when 9600 baud was “fast.” He especially enjoys covering DIY and Maker topics, along with anything on the bleeding edge of technology.
-
bit_user
Good luck with that. Russia has reportedly deployed in-orbit anti-satellite weapons.The article said:The organization is also establishing a system to automatically warn of attempted interference with oceanic fiber optic cables and reroute communications via satellite.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq55ww5j7e2o -
USAFRet
And the US has demonstrated capability to target a satellite in LEO from a surface ship or an F-15.bit_user said:Good luck with that. Russia has reportedly deployed in-orbit anti-satellite weapons.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq55ww5j7e2o
Even though they have their own, Russia depends on GPS just as much as everyone else. -
Notton We're already on the verge of Kessler syndrome from private companies launching a bunch of smaller satellites willy-nilly.Reply
We don't fully understand the effects of aluminum particles in the atmosphere when old ones are destroyed by burning it in re-entry. -
helper800
Here is some actual information about Kessler syndrome for people to read.Notton said:We're already on the verge of Kessler syndrome from private companies launching a bunch of smaller satellites willy-nilly.
We don't fully understand the effects of aluminum particles in the atmosphere when old ones are destroyed by burning it in re-entry. -
Notton the link for aluminum oxide particles thought to behave as a catalyst in ozone layer depletionReply
https://phys.org/news/2024-06-satellite-megaconstellations-jeopardize-recovery-ozone.html -
bit_user
I wonder how much of the problem is due to satellites in a retrograde orbit. Satellites in a polar or high-inclination prograde orbit are probably almost as bad, but if you could at least eliminate retrograde orbits, then you wouldn't have head-on collisions. I gather retrograde orbits aren't that common, primarily for economic reasons (i.e. it requires more fuel to counter the Earth's rotation).helper800 said:Here is some actual information about Kessler syndrome for people to read. -
Samuel White Remember when NATO was in Western Germany only and said they would not progress past that toward Russia with the 91 treaty if Russia got rid of the Soviet Union? Yeah those were good times.Reply -
edzieba
Opposing-orbit object collisions would, be a BEST case scenario: the resulting debris would have an overall lower velocity and re-entry very rapidly.bit_user said:I wonder how much of the problem is due to satellites in a retrograde orbit. Satellites in a polar or high-inclination prograde orbit are probably almost as bad, but if you could at least eliminate retrograde orbits, then you wouldn't have head-on collisions. I gather retrograde orbits aren't that common, primarily for economic reasons (i.e. it requires more fuel to counter the Earth's rotation).
In reality, all collisions this far (deliberate or accidental) have been glancing (similar orbit different inclination, or orbit-to-suborbital), so debris has remained close to its original velocity and thus close to its original orbit. The smaller the difference in velocity between the two objects, the longer the resultant debris cloud will take to re-enter.
*coughBudapestMemorandumCough*Samuel White said:Remember when NATO was in Western Germany only and said they would not progress past that toward Russia with the 91 treaty if Russia got rid of the Soviet Union? Yeah those were good times. -
bit_user
You're presuming comparable mass, but it could be like 1000:1 and still result in some shattering of the larger debris.edzieba said:Opposing-orbit object collisions would, be a BEST case scenario: the resulting debris would have an overall lower velocity and re-entry very rapidly. -
derekullo "Analysts believe Russia is mapping the undersea fiber optic cables that transfer data between continents."Reply
https://www.submarinecablemap.com/You mean those cables?