GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information

GrapheneOS, the privacy-focused Android fork, said in a post on X on Friday that it will not comply with emerging laws requiring operating systems to collect user age data at setup. "GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification or an account," the project stated. "If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • wolfferth
    we already know it's not about "age verification". everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Reply
  • usertests
    wolfferth said:
    we already know it's not about "age verification". everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Grim but true.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    wolfferth said:
    we already know it's not about "age verification". everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Stop being silly
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    They want a digital fingerprint on everything so they can track you from birth to death. We need a lot more "up yours" and bird flipping to the surveillance state.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Good for them.
    I just want to add AB-1043 has this written in it.
    "1798.500
    (c) “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application."

    I'm sure dictionaries define a "Dictionary" as a dictionary too.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    Do does this mean if I install it on my phone they’d get fined?
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Let's be real if people just used parental controls on devices and actually learned to implement them instead of blaming every software company under the sun for there bad decisions we wouldn't have this nanny crap of id every website program under the sun lol.

    It's shocking how many parents don't even know there's parent controls on android and Xbox etc.

    ( As a parent myself most parent locks are robust Xbox/Nintendo) You can even lock the net off.
    Id systems are great when they work.
    but parents must be better informed.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Good for them.

    I may have to check them out now.
    Reply
  • jram79
    Looks like I'm going to be a spry 175 year old in California and Colorado. Nice!
    Reply
  • skyy06
    If got nothing to hide then you got nothing to fear, unless you are a child or a pedophile who refuses to verify
    Reply