Data corruption hobbles Airbus fleet, firm orders immediate software fix for 6,000 planes due to data corruption from intense sun radiation

JetBlue Airways Airbus A321
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Airbus has instructed airlines worldwide to implement an urgent software change on roughly 6,000 A320-family aircraft after investigators traced an October in-flight incident to corrupted flight-control data, likely caused by intense solar radiation. European regulators followed with mandatory directives requiring operators to revert affected aircraft to an earlier software load before their next flight, prompting airlines to begin slotting rapid turn-round updates into already dense schedules.

The recall stems from an October 30 event involving a JetBlue A321 operating near the northeastern United States. According to regulator summaries, the aircraft experienced uncommanded flight-control behaviour tied to the elevator and aileron computer chain. The crew diverted, and several passengers were injured during the upset.

It’s expected that airlines will complete most software updates in the next few days, with Airbus continuing its investigation into the precise failure path.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Google Preferred Source

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • COLGeek
    Seems there is a missing hardware aspect (additional shielding?) from this "fix". Something to watch (I am actually hearing this discussed on the radio as I type this).
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/airbus-issues-major-a320-recall-after-flight-control-incident-2025-11-28/
    And an aviation.se discussion
    https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/113684/the-airbus-a320-that-pitched-down-due-to-solar-radiation-recently-why-did-that
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    There has long been speculation that if we're ever hit directly by one of these catastrophically big solar events it could wipe out large chunks of our modern technology in unpredictable ways.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_Eventhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Zaranthos said:
    There has long been speculation that if we're ever hit directly by one of these catastrophically big solar events it could wipe out large chunks of our modern technology in unpredictable ways.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_Eventhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
    Not speculation.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Seems like they are just refreshing the software. Is this type of anomaly just too much electromagnetic energy for accredited/certified EMC designs to handle? I imagine other airlines vulnerable as well.
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    COLGeek said:
    Not speculation.

    Well the speculation is more about when and how much damage actually happens. Considering they're directional and vary in magnitude it's possible it never happens at the scale some speculate. It's not like they're building homes with wire mesh behind the drywall of new homes yet, or has that been done yet? See now someone has to build a home with chicken wire between a double layer of drywall (less fire hazard) and wait for a big enough event to test it, but then it'll just hit the other side of the planet.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Rats. Did I miss another chance to see some good aurora from a CME?

    I have to start paying attention to the space weather forecasts as closely as I do the terrestrial weather!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Gururu said:
    Seems like they are just refreshing the software.
    Hearing about a software-only fix indeed surprised me. I'd love to know the details, but I doubt we ever will.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    What adds an extra layer to this is that a chunk of the planes cannot just be updated and need new computer systems.
    Reply
  • jabliese
    bit_user said:
    Hearing about a software-only fix indeed surprised me. I'd love to know the details, but I doubt we ever will.
    "investigators determined that a combination of inputs had escaped the expected handling in the latest software release."

    You are welcome. Translation in case you need it: The latest release trusted data not to be corrupted. But that data was corrupted. Bad programmers, bad. Bad software testers, bad. Remaining question, how much of this code was AI driven?
    Reply