AI agent designs a complete RISC-V CPU from a 219-word spec sheet in just 12 hours — comparably simple design required 'many tens of billions of tokens'

QiMeng AI-based chip design system
(Image credit: Chinese Academy of Sciences)
9

AI chip design startup Verkor.io claims, in a research paper published in March, that its agentic AI system, Design Conductor, autonomously produced a complete RISC-V CPU core — taking a 219-word requirements document and generating a verified, layout-ready design in 12 hours, which is orders of magnitude faster than the standard 18- to 36-month timelines seen in commercial chip design.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • IntelUser2000
    I doubt this 1.48GHz processor is actually comparable to 1.2GHz Penryn. That's about the performance of an original in-order Atom and that Atom was comparable to earlier out-of-order ARM processors like Cortex A9 per clock.

    Physical Designs also doesn't map well with simulation. Even if it's functional, performance of an in-order 1-issue chip with no caches will be terrible. In reality I think it'll be hard pressed to beat 486 per clock, which is also 1-issue in-order design. 486 does have L1 caches though.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    What's the going rate for "many tens of billions of tokens" in $USD?
    Reply
  • hwertz
    Don't know if this CPU is particularly useful (maybe it is, a simpe low cost RISC-V may have it's use. Or maybe there's already simple but better designs out there.). But impressive nevertheless.
    Reply
  • roba67
    The AI is creating RTL and running EDA tools. I'd like to see the AI actually synthesize and do layout. Also a chip this size, given the existing specs, is a 1 or 2 man design up to layout which is likely done by the fab. I do chip design.
    Reply
  • nanoflooder
    bit_user said:
    What's the going rate for "many tens of billions of tokens" in $USD?
    Depending on the model; the highest price I could find is $600 per 1M output, so if we take 100bn tokens, that would be $60m. On the other hand, the current frontier Chinese models cost around $5 per 1M, so about $50k total. Exactly how much they spent is anyone's guess.
    Reply
  • Sam Hobbs
    I think that 219-word spec sheet is not an advantage. The results are likely correspondingly impractical. In reality what they should do is to first request a review of the specifications. We should not make specifications bigger just for the sake of making them bigger but making them shorter can also be impractical.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Or hear me out, we find an existing design from 20 years ago, press control-c, then control-v.

    Bam beer me.
    Reply
  • usertests
    palladin9479 said:
    Or hear me out, we find an existing design from 20 years ago, press control-c, then control-v.

    Bam beer me.
    That will be 1 billion tokens, sir.
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000
    palladin9479 said:
    Or hear me out, we find an existing design from 20 years ago, press control-c, then control-v.

    Bam beer me.
    The only possible advantage I see is potentially allowing for a future where it brings new CPU designing to more people, whereas right now it's only available to select people and organizations with heavy funding and decades of training and experience.

    Moore's Law always benefits lower power, lower cost devices more than the high end. This is yet another example of it. It doesn't really bring significant advantages on the high end, and may be nothing more than nice-to-have. But on the low end it becomes a boon.
    Reply