Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger confirms the industry is in an AI bubble, but that a pop could be several years away — 'We’re displacing all of the internet and the service provider industry as we think about it today'

Pat Gelsinger
(Image credit: Getty / Michael M. Santiago)

Pat Gelsinger says we’re already in an AI bubble, but says it could be several years before anything bad happens. The former Intel CEO was asked during an interview on CNBC if we’re in an AI bubble, stating, “There’s a lot of leverage in the system, there’s a lot of cash, but then there’s a whole bunch of other folks who are trying to build these data centers. Whether there’s the energy component side of it, or whether you think about the real estate component, I mean, there’s just a whole lot of things happening at one time.”

Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger: 'Of course' we're in an AI bubble - YouTube Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger: 'Of course' we're in an AI bubble - YouTube
Watch On

“Are we in an AI bubble? Of course, we are. We are hyped, we’re accelerating, we’re putting enormous leverage into the system,” Gelsinger answered. “With that said, I don’t see it ending for several years. I do think we have an industry shift to AI. As Jensen (Huang) talked about, and I agree with this, you know that businesses are yet to really start materially benefiting from [it]. We’re displacing all of the internet and the service provider industry as we think about it today — we have a long way to go.”

Despite the disruption that AI has put on some industries, Gelsinger believes that we still have quite a way to go before we see the AI bubble burst. Continuing improvements in semiconductor efficiency would allow the industry to go further before running into trouble, the former CEO added, stating some changes will start materializing later in the decade. As such, he believes that nothing could change in the state of play for several years, despite radical improvements to AI he acknowledged had transpired in the last year alone.

Many experts are starting to get worried about the AI bubble, especially as companies are investing billions into the technology without seeing real returns yet. Even big institutions like the Bank of England and the International Monetary Fund are worried about it, saying we’re already halfway into a crash that could erase trillions in value. Still, tech companies continue investing and building massive data centers, like OpenAI’s planned gigawatt facility in India. These projects aren’t just costing money and energy — they’re also affecting global memory and storage supply, leading to a price crunch for just about everything that needs them.

If the AI bubble bursts, a lot of industries will be affected. While those working in the semiconductor and AI space will be hit the hardest, financial institutions would also be gravely affected — especially those that have heavily invested in companies like Nvidia and OpenAI. And while the average person might think they’re safe because they do not own stocks in these companies, their banks, pension funds, and other financial instruments likely are, causing widespread chaos if and when this happens.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • vanadiel007
    I think once consumers, as in the industries they use these AI features, are seeing not enough ROI they will start slowly consuming AI, and it will hopefully ramp down rather than burst and cause a big worldwide financial crisis.

    AI companies make a lot of promises, but promises are only going to get you so much sales. Eventually you will have to deliver on your promises or face loss of sales.

    Hoping for a ramp down rather than an abrupt crash.
    Reply
  • Luke Warm
    So take your q's from a guy who was fired in record time for not understanding his own industry? He's in no position to confirm anything. I'll pass. But I might listen to jamie dimon who has his finger on the pulse of modern business. The cost of not using AI is that your competitors offer value added services and solutions that you can't. Gelsinger is desperate to stay relevant, if he ever even was. Tom's needs to do better with clickbait nonsense like this.
    Reply
  • Luke Warm
    vanadiel007 said:
    I think once consumers, as in the industries they use these AI features, are seeing not enough ROI they will start slowly consuming AI, and it will hopefully ramp down rather than burst and cause a big worldwide financial crisis.

    AI companies make a lot of promises, but promises are only going to get you so much sales. Eventually you will have to deliver on your promises or face loss of sales.

    Hoping for a ramp down rather than an abrupt crash. Measuring ROI for this is
    Reply
  • Luke Warm
    Talking heads have a tendency to blather about returns, like they'll be able to quantify the contribution of AI like it's a new business line and they can refer to a sales chart and contribution margin. Good luck with that! The best measure will come with a sales comparison when a company cuts back on spend and no longer provides the industry standard (and now expected) value proposition AI offers (it's there but not always immediately evident). Maybe they get away with it...or maybe they get skewered and now they're behind the game...a CEO's worst nightmare. .. just ask Gelsinger. TBD.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    A pop or a poop?
    Reply
  • JRStern
    And what does Gelsinger know about it, other than what he read on the Internet? The nerve it takes for him to stand up and talk about it.

    If and when 18a works I'll maybe cut him some slack.
    Reply
  • Captain Awesome
    Luke Warm said:
    So take your q's from a guy who was fired in record time for not understanding his own industry? He's in no position to confirm anything. I'll pass. But I might listen to jamie dimon who has his finger on the pulse of modern business. The cost of not using AI is that your competitors offer value added services and solutions that you can't. Gelsinger is desperate to stay relevant, if he ever even was. Tom's needs to do better with clickbait nonsense like this.

    This is too factual to be click bait. Except for the wild financial speculation at the end. 😁 Pension funds don't go all in on a few stocks, they own infrastructure, toll roads, and then a diverse portfolio of stocks. While banks usually make money from lending money, not from going all in on Nvidia.
    Reply
  • Luke Warm
    Captain Awesome said:
    This is too factual to be click bait. Except for the wild financial speculation at the end. 😁 Pension funds don't go all in on a few stocks, they own infrastructure, toll roads, and then a diverse portfolio of stocks. While banks usually make money from lending money, not from going all in on Nvidia.
    Banks make the juicy big margin money from investment banking and trading. Look at the Q3's. Also look for Dimon's recent comments on AI and how his firm is using AI, to save money and create new revenue streams, that's the point I'm making, or trying to make. He knows how it's being used more than Gelsinger. That's factual, or at least more factual than what Gelsinger is speculating on, he's not an end user/consumer,
    Reply
  • JC5000
    There's no bubble. What % of world use cell phones... what % use AI... one day these will be same. There may be consolidation within sector but there's no overall bubble. Anyone in right mind could see Netscape was overpriced... AI saving each person 1000 man hours a year out of 2000 isnt netscape
    Reply
  • Gururu
    He is 100% correct. AI will be fine-tuned to a few spectacular and dominating products while billions in investments will be lost resulting in tons of silicon covering football fields going the way of the bin.
    Reply