Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Florida seeks court ruling to officially classify Sam Altman and ChatGPT as a 'public nuisance' — OpenAI fights to keep lawsuit away from a state jury
Florida's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman has now been sitting before U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in Fort Pierce for seven weeks without a ruling on whether it belongs there. The state filed its 83-page, ten-count complaint in Highlands County circuit court on June 1, pleading only Florida law, naming Altman personally, and demanding a jury. OpenAI removed the case to federal court on July 2, arguing that one count built on the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act pulls the whole action into federal jurisdiction. Amongst other things, the state is seeking a court ruling finding that ChatGPT is a public nuisance.
Florida moved to remand on July 10, calling the removal "preposterous," and briefing closed July 31. In a similar matter, New Mexico kept its own state-law case against Meta out of federal court and this month won a $567 million public-nuisance abatement order on top of a $375 million jury penalty.
Count IV alleges OpenAI violates the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act by collecting data from under-13s without the parental notice and consent the FTC's COPPA rule requires. Paragraph 30 of the complaint expressly disclaims any federal cause of action. Meanwhile, OpenAI's opposition to remand argues the count arises under federal law anyway, that applying COPPA to "artificial intelligence research services is a novel question of federal law," and that 15 U.S.C. §6504 makes federal court the exclusive forum for state attorneys general enforcing COPPA.
OpenAI's brief cites three cases in which states sued platforms under state law, defendants removed, and federal judges sent them back: New Mexico v. Meta, California v. TikTok, and New Jersey v. Discord. OpenAI cites them only to show the judges declined to award fees because removal wasn't "objectively unreasonable." Florida's remand motion asks for fees regardless, arguing OpenAI removed for one reason: "delay."
The complaint's remaining counts cover negligence, gross negligence, strict liability for design defect and failure to warn, fraudulent misrepresentation, and public nuisance. It alleges ChatGPT's memory feature was on by default, the free tier has no age gate, the September 2025 parental controls require a voluntary account link, and GPT-4o's safety evaluation was compressed to one week to beat a Google launch.
The State seeks a permanent injunction on under-13 data collection and a finding that distributing ChatGPT in Florida is a public nuisance, demanding civil penalties of up to $10,000 per willful violation, which is double New Mexico's $5,000 cap. New Mexico's jury found 75,000 violations.
A footnote in every federal filing states that Altman "is not making a general appearance" and reserves a personal-jurisdiction defense. That defense sets up a motion to dismiss the CEO individually, no matter which court hears the case. Much of the record that Florida's case relies on is against Altman, including Greg Brockman's diary and Tasha McCauley's testimony about a "toxic culture of lying," which came out at the Musk v. Altman trial in May. A coalition of 42 state attorneys general subpoenaed OpenAI in June; none has filed a complaint yet.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
The government will declare victory and what will happen is an annoying age of consent button will be placed on the chat screen you have to push to use the tool.
I thought Florida was in the camp of personal responsibility and parenting instead of blaming a company for how it's website works.
Judge Cannon will do everything she can to make it easy for Scam Altman. She wants to make sure that those backs keep getting scratched, as they won't scratch themselves...
Well an OpenAI/ChatGPT appeared on my Company Debit Card two weeks ago and I have never used ChatGPT, never downloaded any tools that autoenabled it, never enabled it on my company websites, never visited anything openAI/ChatGPT, etc... Couldnt' even tell you what their website looks like... Never even seen a ChatGPT splash screen, etc... Certainly never authorized any payment for the product. Suffice to say Sam and Elon aren't getting any favors from me, regardless if the world can't help tripping over itself for GPT/Grok... I even have the Copilot script that turns if off in windows... and I never enable the AI in the browsers I use for search. Sometimes, you just have to draw a line in the sand about a thing... and I've done that with AI.
The bank asked me... well how did they get your account number.... I paused and asked... That's a rheotrical question right? Charges were removed... but I had to be issued a new Debit Card number for my company.
So yeah... Definitely a nuisance... Literally the last time I ever had any card fraud was something like 1995.
The government will declare victory and what will happen is an annoying age of consent button will be placed on the chat screen you have to push to use the tool.
I thought Florida was in the camp of personal responsibility and parenting instead of blaming a company for how it's website works.
Blatant hypocrisy callouts do not work in modern politics.
