Chinese security officials call for investigation of Intel CPUs for chip failures and security flaws, says chipmaker 'threatens national security'
Intel is in hot water in China.
Intel is in hot water after the Cyber Security Association of China called out the company for its cybersecurity vulnerabilities and high failure rates and accused it of adding backdoors to its covert surveillance and digital espionage systems. According to the statement (via China Daily), “Intel has made substantial profits in China, but it continues to engage in actions that harm China’s interests and threaten national security.”
According to data from Statista, China is Intel’s largest source of revenue in 2023, making the company $14.85 billion. The U.S. is a close second, at $13.96 billion, but it will be a massive disaster for the company if it loses China, as it accounted for over a quarter of its over $54 billion revenue last year. This would be the nail in the coffin for the chipmaking giant unless the U.S. swoops in to save it, especially as it has recently announced losing $1.6 billion in its last quarterly earnings call.
The group highlighted several security vulnerabilities, including the GhostRace and Indirector attacks, which allow bad actors to steal sensitive and confidential data from CPUs. While the former affects different platforms, including Arm processors, the latter mostly hits Raptor Lake and Alder Lake chips, although Intel claims that its mitigation advice should protect most users.
Another point of contention of the group was the recent instability issues experienced by 13th and 14th Generation Intel Core processors. However, it has since addressed the problem with the 0x12b microcode update and released an extended warranty for the affected chips. As for the backdoor accusation, there hasn’t been any substantial finding yet that proves it.
Intel is fighting to survive a major crisis, especially as it tries to right its ship after the billions of dollars in losses it incurred with its manufacturing and data center businesses. However, we should also note that the company is one of the pillars of the White House’s CHIPS Act investment, which is meant to jumpstart American innovation in the semiconductor industry. Team Blue received $8.5 billion in direct investments from the federal government.
Washington is simultaneously applying bans and sanctions against China’s chip and AI industry, blocking it from sourcing high-end AI GPUs to protect its investments. It’s also preventing Chinese companies, like Huawei, from participating in American and other allied countries on the allegation that the Chinese government uses them for spying, too.
Although this recent announcement hasn’t resulted in any concrete moves against Intel yet, it has rocked the boat a bit, with the company’s stock price falling by three percent at the market opening. Hopefully, this will not develop into a real action against Intel in China; otherwise, it will be in real trouble and could cause the company to implode.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
coolitic Step 1 of ideological subversion (Demoralization): Convince the citizens of your enemy that you are a better or at least equivalent alternative to their status quo.Reply
In this case: China word-for-word reflecting accusations against it back at its accusers; a "No u". -
tennis2 Perfect ruse. Get legal permission/access to "investigate" the bowels of Intel architecture IP so you can steal it all and make your own chips.Reply -
dalek1234 If an Intel CPU is compromised due to a security vulnerability, would that not be an "unintentional back-door"?Reply -
rluker5 Since they don't have a problem that isn't already fixed, maybe China gov wants loosened restrictions?Reply -
-Fran-
Nope. There must be intention behind a "back door" to exist in the first place. Saying or adding "unintentional" makes it a logical fallacy, I'd say.dalek1234 said:If an Intel CPU is compromised due to a security vulnerability, would that not be an "unintentional back-door"?
In other words: doors don't materialize out of nowhere or erode themselves into structures and must be intentionally placed as they are constructs. A hole is debatable, but (back) doors aren't.
--
As for the news. Well, not much to say, really. The "tit-for-tat" that was mentioned before, for sure.
Regards. -
AkroZ For the back door they can do reference to Intel Management Engine which is a mini OS encrypted on the CPU and all communications pass by it. We don't known exactly what it do but a reseacher found a bit in the firmware used by the NSA to disable it to have a secure environment.Reply
Note that AMD has also implemented a similar system.
But basically this is political:
USA: we will not sell our product for national security concern.
China: we will not buy your product for national security concern.
If they ban Intel, AMD should remain the time they ramp up their local CPU production. -
watzupken
This is precisely the point. So if China sanctions Intel, I am expecting Intel to lose significant revenue, which in turn means more employees will lose their job so that they can keep their cost down. The impact will always be felt by the citizens.dCasualGamer said:It's tit-for-tat move. If US applies some sanctions, China will reciprocate. -
jp7189
Wait isn't that going in the same direction? US blocks GPUs going to China and then China blocks CPUs going to.. China..? Tit for tat implies China blocking a critical resource going to the US.. which they are doing with other things, but this doesn't seem to be that.dCasualGamer said:It's tit-for-tat move. If US applies some sanctions, China will reciprocate. -
-Fran-
The point is China is still a huge market big US Corps need and have in their plans for profit. If China wants to put the US Corps (Shareholders and money holders) against the US Govt (and their people), this is the way to do it.jp7189 said:Wait isn't that going in the same direction? US blocks GPUs going to China and then China blocks CPUs going to.. China..? Tit for tat implies China blocking a critical resource going to the US.. which they are doing with other things, but this doesn't seem to be that.
That's also why the USA has been keen on re-growing some of their in-house building capacity and capabilities.
Regards.