Microsoft BitLocker-protected drives can now be opened with just some files on a USB stick — YellowKey zero-day exploit demonstrates an apparent backdoor

Falling laptop cracking
(Image credit: Getty Images)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • ezst036
    Apple exploit incoming.

    Just the other day it was Linux, now its Microsoft. Android probably coming soon too.

    Its all a cycle. Someone is next. Nobody is perfect.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Yes, at first it seems like the company hasn't done enough, whatever company has been hacked or exploit found. But it seems EVERYTHING is being hacked these days. Personally, I've received nearly a dozen notices saying my info has been stolen and have had free identity protection services for over ten years now. Safe to say everyone's critical personal info is in some black market by now.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    You're telling me the most relevant reason of why Microsoft forced everyone to have (enabled) TPM in order to install and use Win11 is a hackable joke? SAY IT AINT SO!

    surprisedpikachuface.jpg

    Regards.
    Reply
  • dwd999
    Do I understand this correctly that portable drives protected by Bitlocker to Go are still secure? And are drives protected where the key is NOT stored in TPM, e.g. the key is stored in a text file somewhere away from the locked computer, are those still secure?
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    They did this after their disclosure reports were allegedly dismissed by Microsoft's security team
    Sounds about right, maybe they should name and shame the one who dismissed the disclosure.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    SOS, DD it's Microsucks. What did you expect? :anguished:
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    TechieTwo said:
    SOS, DD it's Microsucks. What did you expect? :anguished:
    yawn...
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    TechieTwo said:
    SOS, DD it's Microsucks. What did you expect? :anguished:
    And yesterday it was Apple, and last week it was Linux.

    Your point?
    Reply
  • ezst036
    -Fran- said:
    You're telling me the most relevant reason of why Microsoft forced everyone to have (enabled) TPM in order to install and use Win11
    You know that actually is a really good point Fran.

    We all know the TPM security propaganda since the Windows 11 launch. However why are TPM chips necessary in practice if they don't actually secure?
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    ezst036 said:
    You know that actually is a really good point Fran.

    We all know the TPM security propaganda since the Windows 11 launch. However why are TPM chips necessary in practice if they don't actually secure?
    They are not necessary. That is the grift.

    Encryption (reliable even) has existed for ages in different ways and shapes before TPM was designed and implemented. It's a nice to have, for sure, but make it mandatory? Nah.

    Marrying your hardware to a physical encryption tool does not make it inheritely more secure. That's just gaslighting: "it's ok, this is totally to make your stuff more secure! pinky promise!". It's been widely reported that MS doesn't even use anything with TPM unless you actively enable BitLocker or anything else that requires encryption and supports TPM.

    But oh well... TPM is not a bad thing, just to be clear. Microsoft forcing people to have it for an OS upgrade is the bad thing.

    Regards.
    Reply