Ukraine built a $48,000 long-range drone after covertly snapping Chinese factory photos, clone destroys Russian Tu-95 bomber — attack drone has 2,000 km range, country builds 6,000 flying-wing drones a year

A Ukrainian quadcopter drone taking off
(Image credit: Volodymyr Zelenskyy)

A drone that destroyed a Tupolev Tu-95MS strategic bomber at Russia's Engels-2 air base last month turns out to be a MICH 2000, a reverse-engineered copy of a Chinese aircraft Beijing refused to sell to Ukraine, according to a factory report from defense outlet Oboronka. Built by an unnamed manufacturer exclusively for the SBU's 'Alpha' special operations center, the flying-wing drone carries up to a 60 kg warhead as far as 2,000 km and costs $48,000 in its base configuration, $2,000 less than the Chinese ZTK-150 it was copied from. It’s understood that Ukrainian developers covertly photographed the Chinese production line while attending pilot training there in late 2023.

China restricted exports of civilian drones in the summer of 2023 after Ukrainian units converted airframes like the Mugin-5 PRO into deep-strike munitions. A Ukrainian development team traveled to a Chinese factory late that year, found ZTK-150s in production, and negotiated to buy the manufacturing technology, but the factory's management blocked the sale.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • S58_is_the_goat
    It’s understood that Ukrainian developers covertly photographed the Chinese production line while attending pilot training there in late 2023.
    I thought only china does this? 🤣
    Reply
  • usertests
    S58_is_the_goat said:
    I thought only china does this? 🤣
    Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    Reply
  • dosmastrify
    Intellectual property theft oh my goodness, those poor Chinese! So unfair somebody did it back to them!!
    Reply
  • bill001g
    What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    bill001g said:
    What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one.
    And I think of the word 'drone' as a fully autonomous thing.
    Be it air, land, water.
    Which this is not.

    I say this as a Part 107 sUAS pilot, that despises the term 'drone'.
    (sUAS == small Unmanned Air System)
    https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap11_section_2.html
    Reply
  • Scott_Tx
    The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one.
    They didn't want to get in trouble for copying a copy of a copy.
    Reply
  • wwenze1
    bill001g said:
    What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one.
    Predator called.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    wwenze1 said:
    Predator called.
    There is already a UAV labeled Predator.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1_Predator
    Reply
  • Vicecrow
    Dear god a copy of a copy who dare. Maybe now china will follow the patent Guide and sue the Ukraine
    Reply
  • gamerk316
    Oh no, Chinese IP illegally stolen and put into production!

    Anyways...
    Reply